NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments

NR 447 Registered Nurse Collaborative Healthcare

NR 447 Week 1 Purpose

The purpose of this Collaboration Café is to reflect on your formal or informal leadership experience across a variety of settings.

Course Outcomes

This Collaboration Café enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision-making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

Due Date

Graded Collaboration Cafés in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded Collaboration Cafés, the Collaboration Café will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 Collaboration Café requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Collaboration Café

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments 

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Directions

Collaboration Café: Reflect on Knowledge

Step 1: Reflect on your experiences within and outside the healthcare setting and consider how you have exhibited leadership in a formal or informal capacity.

Step 2: Answer all questions below with explanations and details.?No scholarly sources are required.

Paragraph one: Examine your personal guiding principles and beliefs. Which ones do you think have influenced your approach to leadership?

Paragraph two: Reflect on your personal or professional leadership experiences. How do you feel your personal or professional background has shaped or influenced your ability to lead?

Paragraph three: Reflect on instances when your professional nursing values (i.e., quality care, family presence, compassion, etc.) or specific ethical principles (i.e., autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence) guided your actions as a formal or informal leader. How did adhering to these principles impact your experience and the experience of others? NR 447 Week 1

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the Collaboration Café.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times.

Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.

Grading

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the Collaboration Café title and then Show Rubric.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer all questions/criteria with explanation and detail.

1. Examine your guiding principles and beliefs. Which ones do you think have influenced your approach to leadership?

2. Reflect on your professional background in nursing or outside of healthcare. How do you feel your professional background has shaped or influenced your ability to lead?

3. Reflect on instances when your professional nursing values or ethical standards guided your actions as a formal or informal leader. How did adhering to these principles impact your experience and the experience of others?

28 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

23 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

14 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
28 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the Collaboration Café.

14 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts
Unsatisfactory NR 447 Week 1

No requirements met.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

8 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

7 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

6 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday, the end of the assigned week):

1. Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, and

2. Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, and 2. Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 50 NR 447 Week 1

NR 447 Week 2 Assignment: Leadership Style Analysis

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze current abilities related to leadership, management, and followership, and to discuss goals to improve leadership capacity.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Students?must?complete the Week 2 Leadership Style Analysis assignment and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday?at?11:59?p.m.?MT.?

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction, as noted in the rubric below.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 190 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Complete this assignment following the steps below.

Download the Leadership Style Analysis assignment templateLinks to an external site.. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.

Type your responses on the template. Do not submit handwritten notes. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

Use the SMART goal you formatted this week and the result of the Leadership Style Inventory at the end of the lesson to complete the Leadership Style Analysis assignment.

When complete, save and close the completed template. Click the Submit button at the top of this page to upload your completed assignment.

Using APA format, cite and reference ideas and information from scholarly sources from the Chamberlain library.?Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, professional writing.??

Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.??

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Section 1: Leadership, Management, and Followership

In your current experience, do you more frequently assume the leader, manager, or follower role? Explain your answer.

What do you consider to be your two strongest leadership characteristics? Explain your answer.

What do you consider to be your two most significant leadership opportunities for growth? Explain your answer.

How can your role (as a leader, manager, or follower) change based on the needs or responses of your team? Explain your answer.

Section 2: Leadership Style

What was your result from the Leadership Style Inventory assessment in the lesson? Use citations to discuss.

Do you feel this result accurately reflects your leadership style? Why or why not?

How do you (or how will you) use this leadership style in the clinical practice environment? Give an example.

Section 3: SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-Based) Goal

What was your leadership-related SMART goal from the lesson?

How does this goal help you grow as a professional nursing leader and contribute to your long-term career vision?

What barriers could present themselves in the achievement of this goal? How will you overcome them?

What milestones can you set to assess your progress in achieving this goal? What do the current sources say about milestones and goal setting?

Submit the completed Leadership Style Analysis assignment template to the Week 2 Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 1: Leadership, Management, and Followership

Answer the questions with explanation and detail.

1. In your current experience, do you more frequently assume the leader, manager, or follower role? Explain your answer.

2. What do you consider to be your two strongest leadership characteristics? Explain your answer.

3. What do you consider to be your two most significant leadership opportunities for growth? Explain your answer.

4. How can your role (as a leader, manager, or follower) change based on the needs or responses of your team? Explain your answer.
60 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

55 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

50 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Leadership Style

Answer the questions with explanation and detail.

1. What was your result from the Leadership Style Inventory assessment in the lesson? Use citations to discuss.

2. Do you feel this result accurately reflects your leadership style? Why or why not?

3. How do you (or how will you) use this leadership style in the clinical practice environment? Give an example.
60 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

55 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

50 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 3: SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-Based) Goal

Answer the questions with explanation and detail.

1. What was your leadership-related SMART goal from the lesson?

2. How does this goal help you grow as a professional nursing leader and contribute to your long-term career vision?

3. What barriers could present themselves in the achievement of this goal? How will you overcome them?

4. What milestones can you set to assess your progress in achieving this goal? What does the current literature say about milestones and goal-setting?
60 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

55 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

50 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference Formation

Use the current APA Style standards to format citations and references and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements

Communicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Use
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Correct template used

0 pts

Points Deducted

19 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Assignment submitted on time.

0 pts
Points Deducted

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) 1 day late = 9.5 deduction; 2 days late = 19 deduction; 3 days late = 28.5 deduction; 4 days late = 38 deduction; 5 days late = 47.5 deduction; 6 days late = 57 deduction; 7 days late = 66.5 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

Total Points: 190

Discussion: Conflict Resolution

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the impact of bias, social determinants of health (SDOH), constructive feedback, and organizational culture on conflict resolution within interprofessional teams.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Explain the use of evidence-based practice by leaders and managers. (POs 2, 8)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Graded discussions in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the discussion will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 discussion requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Preparing the Discussion

NR 447 Week 3 Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Discussion: Apply Knowledge

Step 1: Review the scenario below.

You are a preceptor training a nurse who is new to your floor. One client in your shift assignment has Sickle Cell Anemia and requires a complex regimen of oxygen, intravenous (IV) fluids, and pain medication to manage their illness. During interprofessional team rounds, the new nurse states, “I think this client is just seeking pain medication and they aren’t really in that much pain. We should stop giving them so much medication and consider discharge to make room for clients with real illnesses.”

The conversation stops and interprofessional team members are unsure what to say to address the new nurse’s statement. Everyone is upset by her statement, and they begin to argue. The attending physician tells everyone from the team to pause rounds and meet in the conference room in five minutes to resolve this conflict.

Your assigned perspective is based on the first letter of your last name in the chart below.

Last Name Perspective
A – F You are assigned to consider the different components of this scenario through the perspective of implicit and/or explicit bias.
G – L You are assigned to consider the different components of this scenario through the perspective of social determinants of health (SDOH).
M – R You are assigned to consider the different components of this scenario through the perspective of the importance of constructive feedback.
S – Z You are assigned to consider the different components of this scenario from the perspective of organizational culture. NR 447 Week 3

Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

Paragraph one: A supportive work environment is crucial to resolving conflict in any healthcare setting. What is the impact of your assigned perspective on conflict resolution within the interprofessional team?

Paragraph two: Different work environments bring their own unique challenges and opportunities. How would the impact on conflict resolution be different, from your assigned perspective, if the healthcare setting had a highly diverse staff?

Paragraph three: Engagement from all levels of staff is vital to understanding and addressing conflict. From your assigned perspective, how can engagement from staff contribute to understanding and addressing conflict resolution?

References: Provide complete references for all citations.

Step 3: Reply to a peer with a different assigned perspective.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.

Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

Integrate evidence that supports the discussion. NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments

Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.

Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the discussion.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the discussion at least two times.

Post in the discussion on two different days.

Grading

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion title and then Show Rubric.?

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

1. A supportive work environment is crucial to resolving conflict in any healthcare setting. What is the impact of your assigned perspective on conflict resolution within the interprofessional team?

2. Different work environments bring their own unique challenges and opportunities. How would the impact on conflict resolution be different, from your assigned perspective, if the healthcare setting had a highly diverse staff?

3. Engagement from all levels of staff is vital to understanding and addressing conflict. From your assigned perspective, how can engagement from staff contribute to understanding and addressing conflict resolution?
40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate Evidence

(5 required criteria)??

1. Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

2. Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

3. Cite evidence that supports the discussion.

4. Cite and provide a complete reference for all sources of evidence.

5. Select sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references or approved by course faculty.
24 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Very Good

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
24 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the discussion.
26 pts

Excellent

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments All requirements met.

22 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
26 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent

0-1 error(s).

9 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

8 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticpate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week, through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and 2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-10 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 100

Assignment: Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments  Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze current abilities related to emotional intelligence (EI) and perform a personal SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis to enhance professional leadership skills.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO 3: Explain the use of evidence-based practice by leaders and managers. (POs 2, 8)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Students?must?complete the Week 4 Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday?at?11:59?p.m.?MT.?

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 190 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Complete this assignment following the steps below.

Choose the format you want to use for your presentation: Infographic or PowerPoint Presentation.

Follow the specific directions below for your selected format.

Download the appropriate assignment template for the selected presentation format. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. Save the appropriate template to your computer with your last name as part of the file name. See the rubric.

Type your responses on the template. Do not submit handwritten notes. Use the results of the emotional intelligence (EI) quiz within the lesson to perform a personal SWOT analysis. The links to the EI quiz and SWOT analysis steps are included in the lesson.

Use this information to complete your chosen template.

When complete, save the completed template.

Click the Submit button at the top of this page to upload your completed assignment template.

Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.?Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. You may use references from the lesson.

Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, professional writing.

Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

See below for templates and instructions specific to the Infographic and PowerPoint formats.

Format: Infographic

Use Canva.com to create an infographic. Watch this videoLinks to an external site. to learn more about using Canva. Follow the instructions provided to begin using Canva Free.

Open the infographic format of the Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment infographic templateLinks to an external site..

Please use this job aidLinks to an external site. as needed to help with Canva.

Insert images and text as appropriate. Customize colors and fonts. Do not change any headings. Ensure the infographic is readable and well-organized.

Format: PowerPoint

Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create a PowerPoint presentation.

Download the Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment PowerPoint templateLinks to an external site..

Insert images and text as appropriate. Customize colors and fonts if you like. Do not change any headings or the number of slides. Create slides that are professional in appearance and tone and balanced spatially, including words and graphics.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

Section 1: Introduction

Title slide.

Explain the purpose of the presentation (i.e., The purpose of this presentation is to explain the results of the Emotional Intelligence assessment and my SWOT plan…).

What is emotional intelligence?

Why is your reflection on your EI score important in leadership development? Include references here.

Section 2: Strengths

What do you do well?

What do others see as your strengths?

What abilities or values set you apart?

Section 3: Weaknesses

What are others likely to see as weaknesses?

What are your negative habits?

What could you improve?

Section 4: Opportunities

What opportunities are open to you?

What trends could you take advantage of?

How can you turn your strengths into opportunities?

Section 5: Threats

What obstacles to professional growth do you currently face?

Could any of your weaknesses lead to threats?

Section 6: Final Reflection

Summarize results

Are they accurate?

How will this exercise help you in achieving your SMART goal formed in week 2?

Section 7: Adherence to Assignment Guidelines

Includes reference list. Feel free to use sources from the lesson.

Includes in-text citations.

Follows instructions for format and length.

Presentation is clear, organized, and professional.

Submit the completed Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment template to the Week 4 Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 1: Introduction

1. Title slide.

2. Explain the purpose of the presentation.

3. What is emotional intelligence?

4. Why is your reflection on your EI score important in leadership development?
25 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

23 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

21 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Strengths

1. What do you do well?

2. What do others see as your strengths?

3. What abilities or values set you apart?

25 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

21 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 3: Weaknesses

1. What are others likely to see as weaknesses?

2. What are your negative habits?

3. What could you improve?

25 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

21 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 4: Opportunities NR 447 Week 4

1. What opportunities are open to you?

2. What trends could you take advantage of?

3. How can you turn your strengths into opportunities?
25 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

21 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 5: Threats

1. What obstacles to professional growth do you currently face?

2. Could any of your weaknesses lead to threats?
25 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 6: Final Reflection

1. Summarize results

2. Are they accurate?

3. How will this exercise help you in achieving your SMART goal formed in week 2?
35 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

29 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

18 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 7: Adherence to Assignment Guidelines

1. Includes reference list. Feel free to use sources from the lesson reference list.

2. Includes in-text citations.

3. Follows instructions for format and length.

4. Presentation is clear, organized, and professional.
20 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

18 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

17 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference Formation

Use the current APA Style standards to format citations and references and is free of errors.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements

Communicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Used

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Correct template used.

0 pts

Points Deducted

19 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Submitted on time

0 pts

Points Deducted

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) 1 day late = 9.5 deduction; 2 days late = 19 deduction; 3 days late = 28.5 deduction; 4 days late = 38 deduction; 5 days late = 47.5 deduction; 6 days late = 57 deduction; 7 days late = 66.5 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

Total Points: 190

Discussion: Waste in Healthcare

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to examine the underlying causes, financial implications, and effective solutions related to waste in healthcare.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Graded discussions in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the discussion will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 discussion requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Preparing the Discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Discussion: Apply Knowledge

Step 1: Review the scenario below.

Your healthcare facility is examining methods of improving the organization’s financial health. You are on a committee evaluating different forms of waste in your organization. As a committee member, you have been assigned to consider a specific topic that contributes to waste in healthcare. Your assigned topic is based on the first letter of your last name in the chart below. You will respond to a peer with a different assigned topic.

Last Name Topic
A – F Medical errors
G – L Overuse of tests or procedures
M – R Wasting supplies
S – Z Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs)

Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

Paragraph one: Elaborate on your assigned topic, detailing its role in contributing to waste in healthcare settings. What are the financial implications of this topic on healthcare organizations?

Paragraph two: Explore 1-2 potential evidence-based strategies to address your assigned topic. How do these strategies integrate interprofessional communication and collaboration?

Paragraph three: Reflect on the influence of organizational culture on your topic and the strategies you’ve proposed to address it. As a nursing leader, how can you disseminate your suggested solutions?

References: Provide complete references for all citations.

NR 447 Week 5 Step 3: Reply to a peer with a different assigned topic.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.

Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.

Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.

Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the discussion.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the discussion at least two times.

Post in the discussion on two different days.

Grading

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments  Rubric

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion title and then Show Rubric.?
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

1. Elaborate on your assigned topic, detailing its role in contributing to waste in healthcare settings. What are the financial implications of this topic on healthcare organizations?

2. Explore 1-2 potential evidence-based strategies that address your assigned topic. How do these strategies integrate interprofessional communication and collaboration?

3. Reflect on the influence of organizational culture on your topic and the strategies you’ve proposed to address it. As a nursing leader, how can you disseminate your suggested solutions?
40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

17 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate Evidence

(5 required criteria)??

1. Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

2. Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

3. Cite evidence that supports the discussion.

4. Cite and provide a complete reference for all sources of evidence.

5. Select sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references or approved by course faculty.

24 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Very Good

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the discussion.
26 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
26 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent

0-1 error(s).

9 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

8 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticpate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week, through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and 2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-10 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 100

Assignment: Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to apply root cause analysis (RCA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) to a practice issue using leadership skills and evidence-based practice.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

CO 3: Explain the use of evidence-based practice by leaders and managers. (POs 2, 8)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Students must complete the Week 6 Fishbone and Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) Quality Improvement assignment and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday?at?11:59?p.m.?MT.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction, as noted in the rubric below.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 190 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Complete this assignment following the steps below.

Download the Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement assignment PowerPoint templateLinks to an external site.. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric. Type your responses on the template in place of the [Type Here] text. Do not submit handwritten notes. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

Select a quality improvement (QI) problem that requires quality improvement. This should be the same problem you described in the Wednesday Check-In. It may be a real problem you are currently encountering in practice or clinical rotations, a past or future concern, or a problem from the literature you are familiar with. Form a problem statement with that information. Some examples of problem statements include but are not limited to:

The fall rate on the unit is above the benchmark.

The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) on the unit is above the benchmark.

The central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate is above the benchmark.

Admitted clients boarding in the Emergency Department are experiencing delays in care.

Healthcare providers are experiencing workplace violence with high injury rates.

Gather 1-2 scholarly sources of literature that document this problem in healthcare and provide evidence supporting the need for quality improvement.

Complete the sections in the template outlining the problem, the rationale for the selection of the problem, and the literature documenting the need for a solution. Each section should include 2-3 sentences. Cite sources where specified.

Use the fishbone diagram in the template to complete a root cause analysis of the problem.

NR 447 Week 6 Briefly describe the problem

Under each category (People, Environment, Method/Process, and Equipment/Supplies), list at least two contributing factors to the problem. The contributing factors may fall under more than one category. See the example in the lesson.

Mark each contributing factor as a realistic or unrealistic target for improvement efforts using the visual designations on the template. For example, staffing, while a contributing factor to many problems, is not a realistic target for improvement efforts.

Complete the PDSA Quality Improvement Project outline using the spaces provided on the template (replacing the [Type Here] instructions with your text). Write this section acting as if you have completed the QI project.

Select one contributing factor from the fishbone diagram. This should be one of the realistic targets for improvement efforts identified on the fishbone diagram.

List 2-4 interprofessional stakeholders involved in the project (delete any unused [Type Here] text).

Write one SMART goal for the PDSA Quality Improvement Project.

Under the “Plan” phase, write a plan for the quality improvement project to meet the SMART goal. How will you meet your SMART goal? Describe your plan in 2-3 sentences.

Under the “Do” phase, imagine you have completed the project. Briefly describe how the Plan was hypothetically implemented. What were the results? Include hypothetical data. Describe your implementation in 2-3 sentences using past tense.

Under the “Study” phase, imagine that you have completed the project. Briefly evaluate the data. Did your results demonstrate successful implementation? Identify whether the goal was met or not met. Describe your evaluation using 2-3 sentences using past tense.

Under the “Act” phase, imagine that you have completed the project. Briefly describe how to maintain the improvement or revise and repeat the PDSA process based on whether or not the goal was met. Describe your process in 2-3 sentences using past tense. See the example in the lesson.

Click the Submit button at the top of this page to upload your completed assignment.

Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.?Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. Hanging indent is not required.

Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). NR 447 Week 6

Description of the Problem

State problem to examine in Root Cause Analysis (RCA).

State rationale for problem selection.

Include a brief description of literature supporting the need for quality improvement (QI).

Include in-text citations.

Fishbone Diagram

Identify the problem in the designated area.

Identify appropriate contributing factors for each category.

Include at least two contributing factors for all categories. Delete any unused text boxes.

Identify each contributing factor as realistic or unrealistic targets for QI efforts.

Correlation with Contributing Factor

Select one realistic contributing factor from the fishbone diagram.

List 2-4 interprofessional stakeholders involved in the project.

Write one SMART goal for the PDSA Quality Improvement Project.

PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act)

Under the “Plan” phase, write a plan (in 2-3 sentences) for the quality improvement project to meet the SMART goal.

Under the “Do” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how the Plan was hypothetically implemented and what data was collected.

Under the “Study” phase, briefly evaluate (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) the data. Identify whether the goal was met or not met.

Under the “Act” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how to maintain the improvement or revise and repeat the PDSA process based on whether or not the goal was met.

Submit the completed Week 6 Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement assignment template to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the Problem

1. State problem to examine in Root Cause Analysis (RCA).

2. State rationale for problem selection.

3. Include a brief description of literature supporting the need for quality improvement (QI).

4. Include in-text citations.
60 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

55 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

50 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFishbone Diagram

1. Identify the problem in the designated area.

2. Identify appropriate contributing factors for each category.

3. Include at least two contributing factors for all categories. Delete any unused text boxes.

4. Identify each contributing factor as realistic or unrealistic targets for QI efforts.

60 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

55 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

50 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrelation with Contributing Factor

1. Select one realistic contributing factor from the fishbone diagram.

2. List 2-4 interprofessional stakeholders involved in the project.

3. Write one SMART goal for the PDSA Quality Improvement Project.
20 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

17 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) NR 447 Week 6

1. Under the “Plan” phase, write a plan (in 2-3 sentences) for the quality improvement project to meet the SMART goal.

2. Under the “Do” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how the Plan was hypothetically implemented and what data was collected.

3. Under the “Study” phase, briefly evaluate (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) the data. Identify whether the goal was met or not met.

4. Under the “Act” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how to maintain the improvement or revise and repeat the PDSA process based on whether or not the goal was met.

40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

36 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference Formation

Use the current APA Style standards to format citations and references and is free of errors.?Hanging indent is not required.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Use
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Correct template used

0 pts

Points Deducted

19 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Assignment submitted on time.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) 1 day late = 9.5 deduction; 2 days late = 19 deduction; 3 days late = 28.5 deduction; 4 days late = 38 deduction; 5 days late = 47.5 deduction; 6 days late = 57 deduction; 7 days late = 66.5 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

Total Points: 190

PreviousNext

Discussion: Advocacy

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore methods for getting involved in advocating for healthcare topics and consider the means of effectively collaborating with communities, professionals, and policymakers to promote change.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Graded discussions in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the discussion will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 discussion requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Preparing the Discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Apply Knowledge

Step 1: Healthcare issues can range from client care to workplace conditions. Consider one healthcare issue that you find important. Reflect on how this topic aligns with the social determinants of health (SDOH). Refer to the lesson for examples.

Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

Paragraph one: Describe the selected healthcare issue. Explain why you chose the topic, why it is a significant concern, and how it is influenced by the social determinants of health (SDOH) according to the literature.

Paragraph two: Consider how you could collaborate with others to advocate for your chosen issue. Explain how you could engage with interprofessional colleagues, organizations, or online communities to enhance your advocacy efforts.

Paragraph three: Consider how your topic is impacted by decision-makers at various levels (local, state, or federal level, e.g., school board, mayor, health department, congressional leaders, etc.). Imagine you are writing a letter or email to a leader or policymaker. Identify who you would write to and compose a few attention-grabbing sentences advocating for action on your chosen issue, citing at least one reference supporting the need for change in your letter.

References: Provide complete references for all citations.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.

Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.

Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.

Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the discussion.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the discussion at least two times.

Post in the discussion on two different days.

Grading

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Rubric

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion title and then Show Rubric.?
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

1. Describe the healthcare issue you’ve selected. Explain why you chose the topic, why it is a significant concern, and how it is influenced by the social determinants of health (SDOH) according to the literature.

2. Consider how you could collaborate with others to advocate for your chosen issue. Explain how you could engage with interprofessional colleagues, organizations, or online communities to enhance your advocacy efforts.

3. Consider how your topic is impacted by decision-makers at various levels (local, state, or federal level, e.g., school board, mayor, health department, congressional leaders, etc.). Imagine you are writing a letter or email to a leader or policymaker. Identify who you would write to and compose a few attention-grabbing sentences advocating for action on your chosen issue, citing at least one reference supporting the need for change in your letter.

40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate Evidence

(5 required criteria)??

1. Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

2. Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

3. Cite evidence that supports the discussion.

4. Cite and provide a complete reference for all sources of evidence.

5. Select sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references or approved by course faculty.

24 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Very Good

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
24 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the discussion.
26 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
26 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent

0-1 error(s).

9 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

8 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticpate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week, through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and 2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-10 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 100

Collaboration Café: Graded Reflection

NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments Purpose

The purpose of this Collaboration Café is to reflect on course outcomes, program outcomes, and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials to expand self-awareness, identify knowledge gaps, and assess learning goals.

Course Outcomes

This Collaboration Café enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

CO 3: Explain the use of evidence-based practice by leaders and managers. (POs 2, 8)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

Due Date

Graded Collaboration Cafés in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded Collaboration Cafés, the Collaboration Café will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 Collaboration Café requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Collaboration Café

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Collaboration Café: Reflect on Knowledge

Step 1: Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Answer all questions/criteria below with explanations and detail.?No scholarly sources are required.

Paragraph one: How do you envision using the concepts learned in this course in your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse?

Paragraph two: Examine the following program outcomes. Select one and reflect on how your learning in the course assisted in helping to achieve that outcome.

PO?2: Demonstrates leadership and collaboration with consumers and other healthcare providers in providing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration, health maintenance and rehabilitative activities.

PO?7: Practices in established professional roles consistent with entry-level BSN graduates to provide cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings.

PO?8: Incorporates evidence-based practice in the provision of professional nursing care to individuals, families, aggregates and communities.

Paragraph three: Examine the following competencies from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. Select one and reflect on how the course assisted in achieving that competency.

6.4: Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values.

7.3: Optimize system effectiveness through application of innovation and evidence-based practice.

9.4: Comply with relevant laws, policies, and regulations.

10.3: Develop capacity for leadership.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post. NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the Collaboration Café.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times.

Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the Collaboration Café title and then Show Rubric.

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer all questions/criteria with explanation and detail.

1. How do you envision using the concepts learned in this course in your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse?

2. Examine the following program outcomes. Select one and reflect on how your learning in the course assisted in helping to achieve that outcome.

• PO?2: Demonstrates leadership and collaboration with consumers and other healthcare providers in providing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration, health maintenance and rehabilitative activities.

• PO?7: Practices in established professional roles consistent with entry-level BSN graduates to provide cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings.

• PO?8: Incorporates evidence-based practice in the provision of professional nursing care to individuals, families, aggregates and communities.

3. Examine the following competencies from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. Select one and reflect on how the course assisted in achieving that competency.

• 6.4: Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values.

• 7.3: Optimize system effectiveness through application of innovation and evidence-based practice.

• 9.4: Comply with relevant laws, policies, and regulations.

• 10.3: Develop capacity for leadership.
28 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

23 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

14 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the Collaboration Café.
14 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

8 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

7 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

6 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday, the end of the assigned week):

1. Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, and

2. Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, and 2. Post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the Collaboration Café at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the Collaboration Café on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 50 NR 447 Course Discussions & Assignments