NR 447 Week 7 Purpose

Discussion: Advocacy

NR 447 Week 7 Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore methods for getting involved in advocating for healthcare topics and consider the means of effectively collaborating with communities, professionals, and policymakers to promote change.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)

CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

CO 4: Describe interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies. (POs 2, 3)

CO 5: Summarize legal, ethical, and professional competencies utilized by nursing leadership. (PO 6)

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NR 447 Week 7 HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

Due Date

Graded discussions in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the discussion will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 discussion requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Preparing the Discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

NR 447 Week 7 Discussion: Apply Knowledge

Step 1: Healthcare issues can range from client care to workplace conditions. Consider one healthcare issue that you find important. Reflect on how this topic aligns with the social determinants of health (SDOH). Refer to the lesson for examples.

Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

Paragraph one: Describe the selected healthcare issue. Explain why you chose the topic, why it is a significant concern, and how it is influenced by the social determinants of health (SDOH) according to the literature.

Paragraph two: Consider how you could collaborate with others to advocate for your chosen issue. Explain how you could engage with interprofessional colleagues, organizations, or online communities to enhance your advocacy efforts.

Paragraph three: Consider how your topic is impacted by decision-makers at various levels (local, state, or federal level, e.g., school board, mayor, health department, congressional leaders, etc.). Imagine you are writing a letter or email to a leader or policymaker. Identify who you would write to and compose a few attention-grabbing sentences advocating for action on your chosen issue, citing at least one reference supporting the need for change in your letter.

References: Provide complete references for all citations. NR 447 Week 7

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.

Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.

Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.

Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the discussion.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the discussion at least two times.

Post in the discussion on two different days.

Grading

NR 447 Week 7 Rubric

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion title and then Show Rubric.?
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply Knowledge

(3 Required Criteria)

Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

1. Describe the healthcare issue you’ve selected. Explain why you chose the topic, why it is a significant concern, and how it is influenced by the social determinants of health (SDOH) according to the literature.

2. Consider how you could collaborate with others to advocate for your chosen issue. Explain how you could engage with interprofessional colleagues, organizations, or online communities to enhance your advocacy efforts.

3. Consider how your topic is impacted by decision-makers at various levels (local, state, or federal level, e.g., school board, mayor, health department, congressional leaders, etc.). Imagine you are writing a letter or email to a leader or policymaker. Identify who you would write to and compose a few attention-grabbing sentences advocating for action on your chosen issue, citing at least one reference supporting the need for change in your letter.

40 pts

Excellent

NR 447 Week 7 All requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate Evidence

(5 required criteria)??

1. Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

2. Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

3. Cite evidence that supports the discussion.

4. Cite and provide a complete reference for all sources of evidence.

5. Select sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references or approved by course faculty.

24 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Very Good

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
24 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngage in Meaningful Dialogue

(3 required criteria)

1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

3. Add depth to the discussion.
26 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

22 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.
26 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate Professionally

1. Communicate clearly and concisely.

2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent

0-1 error(s).

9 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

8 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

5 pts

Needs Improvement NR 447 Week 7

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticpate

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week, through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and 2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

Points Deducted (-10 points)

During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts

Total Points: 100 NR 447 Week 7