NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

NR 505 Week 1 Discussion: Area of Interest in NP

Purpose

Over the course of the next eight weeks, we will be examining concepts related to nursing research and the translation of evidence to practice. To help you better understand the process, you will be identifying a practice issue for nurse practitioners. You will develop a PICOT question associated with the issue, find evidence to support a change in practice, and present your recommendations for change to your peers. This week, we will work on helping you refine your area of interest so that you will be able to develop a concise question for next week’s assignment. You are encouraged to use the area of interest you chose for the project in NR500NP and/or NR501NP; however, you may choose a different area if you wish.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Select an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. In 1-2 paragraphs, describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least two outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. Please pick something you can do as a NP in your practice that is patient focused. Your intervention needs to relate to a measurable patient health outcome. Please avoid anything that would require a policy or law change, such as full-practice authority. Burnout and satisfaction surveys also are not appropriate topics as they are not patient centered.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Review this 4-minute video to gain a better understanding of the requirements of a PICOT question. The PICOT question is not a research question, but a quality improvement issue that requires a practice change.

Due Date

A 5% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0 for any portion of the discussion not posted by that time).

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday.

A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.

Total Points Possible: 50

Preparing the Assignment

Discussion Criteria

Application of Course Knowledge: The student’s initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post must be posted by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT. Two resources must be used in your initial post. One from the weekly reading or lesson and one outside source.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.

A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.

Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.

A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.

Integration of Evidence: The student post provides support from a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation with a matching reference AND assigned readings OR online lessons, per discussion topic per week. Two resources total and to count must be an in-text citation in your initial post.

What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).

Contains references for sources cited

Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)

Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article

What is not considered a scholarly resource?

Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)

Information from Wikipedia or any wiki

Textbooks

Website homepages

The weekly lesson

Articles in healthcare and nursing-oriented trade magazines, such as Nursing Made Incredibly Easy and RNMagazine (Source: What is a scholarly article.docx; Created 06/09 CK/CL Revised: 02/17/11, 09/02/11 nlh/clm)

Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly source?

Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.

Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources (e.g., the readings for the week)?

Not as a sole source within the post. The textbook and/or assigned (required) articles for the week can be used, but another outside source must be cited for full credit. Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources for the purpose of discussions.

Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for discussions?

Yes, if they are documents or data cited from credible websites. Credible websites usually end in .gov or .edu; however, some .org sites that belong to professional associations (e.g., American Heart Association, National League for Nursing, American Diabetes Association) are also considered credible websites. Websites ending with .com are not to be used as scholarly resources

Professionalism in Communication: The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.

Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

Discussion Rubric

Category Points Description
Application of Course Knowledge 15 Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty 10 Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, adding depth to the conversation
Integration of Evidence 15 Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:

1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years
Total content points = 40 points
Grammar and Communication 5 Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner
Reference Citation 5 References have complete information as required by APA

In-text citations included for all references AND references included for all in-text citation
Total format points = 10 points
Discussion total points = 50 points

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric

NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge

Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.
15 pts

Excellent

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

14 pts

Very Good

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding

12 pts

Satisfactory

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not address the initial question(s).
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty

The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
10 pts

Excellent

Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

9 pts

Very Good

Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

8 pts

Satisfactory

Responds to a student peer and course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No response post to another student or course faculty.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence

Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:

1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years.
15 pts

Excellent

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.*

14 pts

Very Good

Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

12 pts

Satisfactory

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.*

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not integrate any evidence.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication
5 pts

Excellent

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

4 pts

Very Good

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

3 pts

Satisfactory

Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation

5 pts

Excellent

References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

4 pts

Very Good

References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

3 pts

Satisfactory

References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
0 pts

0 Points Deducted

0 pts

2.5 Points Deducted
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses
0 pts

0 Points Deducted

A 5% penalty will be imposed for not entering at least THREE posts on the minimum of TWO separate days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

2.5 Points Deducted
0 pts

NR 505 Week 2 Assignment: PICOT Question Worksheet

Assignment

Purpose

Evidence-based practice is initiated by nurses and other healthcare professionals who identify questions about specific health-related interventions and the outcomes of those interventions on individuals and populations. The creation of a PICOT question helps guide evidence-based initiatives. The purpose of this worksheet is to provide an opportunity to explore the development of a PICOT question as a foundation for evidence-based practice.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1, 4)

CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2)

CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

The assignment should be submitted to the Week 2 PICOT Question Worksheet dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MST at the end of Week 2. This assignment will follow the late assignment policy specified in the course syllabus.

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of a situation that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 100 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Review the elements included in PICOT questions to guide evidence-based nursing practice.

Respond to the questions below using the PICOT Question Worksheet TemplateLinks to an external site. Download PICOT Question Worksheet Template.

Using a minimum of 3 scholarly nursing sources, current within 5 years:

Identify and describe one practice-related issue or concern. You may choose to build on the practice issue you identified in NR500NP/NR501NP.

Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes.

Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all of the following:

P-Population and problem– What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect?

I–Intervention– What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?

C–Comparison– What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.

O–Outcome– Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome.

T–Time frame– What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion?

Construct your PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format (narrative) and define each letter separately, such as:

P =

I =

C =

O =

T =

PICOT question written in full =

Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.

At the graduate level, we like to see you synthesizing your ideas into your own words. No direct quotes may be used in this worksheet.

Use APA formatting guidelines for references and citations.

Submit your worksheet using the PICOT Worksheet Template as a Word document to the Week 2 Dropbox

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Café

Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique

Collaboration Café

With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice.

Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Description of the purpose

Explanation of research design

Discussion of sample

Description of data collection methods

Summary of findings

Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)

Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)

Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.

Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.

During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.

The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.

For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT.

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Summary

Assignment

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to find and appraise resources related to the PICOT question from Week 2. The focus of this assignment is to evaluate pertinent literature that supports the practice change intervention.

Note: You are to locate original studies with research conducted and published by the primary investigator. You may also use quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods studies, meta-analyses or Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)

CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 5

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Requirements

Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
State the PICOT question

For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type.

Preparing the Assignment:

Use the designated Research Summary Table WorksheetLinks to an external site. Links to an external site.to supply the required information.

All scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles must be current within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided, and the instructor has approved the use of an older reference.

Use APA 7th edition formatting for references.

Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria

Points
%
Description

PICOT question

20
10%

PICOT question provided in sentence format

Articles 1-10

15/article

150 total
7.5% / article

75% total
For each article:

Scholarly article: US based peer reviewed journal focused for clinicians

Publication date is current within 5 years

Correctly categorizes article type

Completes all seven areas of article analysis

Explains relevance to PICOT question and implications for advanced nursing practice

APA

20
10%

Use of worksheet template

Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:

Font style and size

Citing and referencing sources

Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

Graduate-level writing style

Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure

Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing

Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes

Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:

Font style and size

Citing and referencing sources

Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

Use of template

Total

200
100 %

Rubric

NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
20 pts

Exceptional

PICOT question provided in sentence format and all five attributes are listed. (Six critical elements.)

18 pts

Exceeds

PICOT question provided in sentence format, but one attribute is not defined. (Five critical elements.)

16 pts

Meets

PICOT question provided in sentence format, but two attributes are not defined. (Four critical elements.)

8 pts

Needs Improvement

PICOT question is not in sentence format and/or three or more attributes are not defined.

0 pts

Developing

PICOT question not supplied.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 1

15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 2
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 3
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 4
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 5
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 6
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 7

15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 8
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 9

15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 10
15 pts

Exceptional

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)

13 pts

Exceeds

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.

12 pts

Meets

Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.

6 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements

0 pts

Developing

Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

20 pts

Exceptional

• Correct APA format with 0-1 error for the following: • Font style and size • Citing and referencing sources • Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

18 pts

Exceeds

• APA format with 2-4 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

16 pts

Meets

• APA format with 5-7 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

8 pts

Needs Improvement

• APA format with 8-9 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

0 pts

Developing

• APA format with > 10 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing

10 pts

Exceptional

0-1 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.

9 pts

Exceeds

2-4 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.

8 pts

Meets

5-7 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.

0 pts

Developing

10 or more errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources OR template is not used.

10 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

DiscussionPurpose

Respond to the following prompts:

How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?

In looking at the studies you reviewed for your PICOT question, do you feel that today’s researchers adequately protect the rights of human subjects? If not, what additional measures do you recommend?

Due Date

A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.

Total Points Possible: 50

Preparing the Assignment

Application of Course Knowledge: The student’s initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post due by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT. You must include two resources in your initial post: one from your lesson or weekly reading and one from an outside scholarly source.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.

Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.

A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.

What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).

Contains references for sources cited

Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)

Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article

What is not considered a scholarly resource?

Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)

Information from Wikipedia or any wiki

Textbooks

Website homepages

The weekly lesson

Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly source?

Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.

Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources (e.g., the readings for the week)?

Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for discussions?

Wednesday Participation Requirement: The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

Discussion Rubric

Category Points Description
Application of Course Knowledge 15 Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty 10 Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, adding depth to the conversation
Integration of Evidence 15 Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:

In-text citations included for all references AND references included for all in-text citation
Total format points = 10 points
Discussion total points = 50 points

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR 505 Week 7 Assignment: Recommendation for an Evidence-Based Practice Change PowerPoint Presentation

Assignment

Purpose

Translating knowledge into practice establishes evidence-based practice (EBP) within the nursing profession. Nurse practitioners participate in the dissemination of research evidence to support the creation of practice interventions. The purpose of this assignment is to prepare students to disseminate evidence to support practice. Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)

CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)

CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

Sun., 11:59pm MT Sunday

Submit your PowerPoint file to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 7.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Requirements

In Week 7, students will create a PowerPoint slide show with notes pages discussing their PICOT question, literature review, and recommendations for change. In Week 8, students will create a Kaltura recording of the presentation for the Peer Discussion thread.

Criteria for Content

Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

Creating a Professional PowerPoint PresentationLinks to an external site.Download Creating a Professional PowerPoint Presentation

In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.
Title Slide

Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.

Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2. Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas.

PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2. Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following:

P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect?

I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?

C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.

O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome.

T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion?

Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.

Recommendations (3 slides):

Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.

Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), Ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic.

References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required.

Preparing the Presentation

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Power Point to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.

Length: The PowerPoint presentation should be between 9-13 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).

Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes.

Submission: Submit the PowerPoint file to the Week 7 Dropbox.

Best Practices in Preparing the Presentation

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation:

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Review the Creating a Professional Presentation located in Course Resources.

Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.

Abide by Chamberlain University academic integrity policy.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

Description

Introduction

(1 slide)
10
5%
Introduction includes concepts to be addressed. Identify sections of the PowerPoint presentation. Speaker notes include details of what will be covered in the presentation.

Nursing Practice Issue/Problem
20
10%

Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing. Explanation of the impact of this issue or concern on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern.

*The nursing practice issue/problem description may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

PICOT question
20
10%
Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as:

P =

I =

C =

O =

T =

PICOT question =
Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements.

*The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

Literature Review

25%
Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.

Recommendations Slide 1: Identify EBP change
20
10%
Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

Recommendations Slide 2: Identify key stakeholders
20

10%

Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.

Recommendations Slide 3: Analyze fit, feasibility, and appropriateness
20

10%
Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail.

*Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

Conclusion

(1 slide)
10
5%
Summarize key information presented in PowerPoint presentation. Provide speaker notes

170
85%

Total CONTENT Points= 170 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category
Points
%
Description

APA Format
10

5%
Ideas and information that come from scholarly sources must be cited and referenced correctly. In-text and parenthetical citations must be used and may be provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required.

Presentation of Slides

10
5%
PowerPoint presentation includes title slide, 9-13 content slides, and reference slide(s). Presentation of slides is professional in appearance and tone. Balance among space, words and graphics, and color is effective.

Writing Mechanics
10
5%
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current APA manual.
30
15%
Total FORMAT Points = 30 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 200 points

Rubric

NR505NP Week 7 EBP Presentation Rubric
NR505NP Week 7 EBP Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
10 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is concise and includes the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction

9 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is adequate and includes the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction

8 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information includes ONE of the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information is unclear or disorganized and includes one of or both the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No introduction slide

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Practice Issue/Problem

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements. *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
50 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

46 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

42 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

25 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week . • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Identify EBP Change

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Key Stakeholders

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Fit, Feasibility, Appropriateness

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

9 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is adequate and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

8 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in the following element is missing: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation Provides speaker notes

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Conclusion is not provided

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

10 pts

Excellent

APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present

9 pts

Very Good

8 pts

Satisfactory

5 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of Slides
10 pts

Excellent

PowerPoint presentation addresses all of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

9 pts

Very Good

PowerPoint presentation does not address one of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

8 pts

Satisfactory

PowerPoint presentation does not address two of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

5 pts

Needs Improvement

PowerPoint does not address three or more of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

PowerPoint is unprofessional and does not include any elements

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
10 pts

Excellent

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

9 pts

Very Good

3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

8 pts

Satisfactory

5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

5 pts

Needs Improvement

7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
0 pts

0 Points Deducted

0 pts

20 Points Deducted

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext

NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Peer Review

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative peer review is to provide students with the opportunity to engage in the critique of peers’ week 7 evidence-based projects. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Meaningful dialogue among students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO 4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO 5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

Week 8: Kaltura Presentation must be uploaded to Week 8 discussion by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT week 8. Two responses to peer presentations are due by Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 8.

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Assignment

Initial post: Create a Kaltura video presentation based on the PowerPoint slideshow you submitted in week 7. The slides you created should be displayed on your screen in the recorded presentation; Use of the Kaltura camera feature is optional. A clear audio presentation of the content should be included. While the presentation is due Wednesday, please consider posting the presentation to the discussion area early in the week to facilitate a robust discussion.

Kaltura Resources: Use the Kaltura resources found under the Resources tab in the course. If you have difficulty using Kaltura Capture Space, reach out to IT first (please obtain a ticket number). If you are still unable to record using Kaltura, reach out to your instructor for alternate recording options.

Participating in the Discussion: View and provide feedback on a minimum of 2 peer presentations. You may address some of the following questions in your responses:

Is the PICOT question original, relevant, and interesting?

Is the presentation clear and easy to follow?

Did the presentation provide sufficient evidence to support the presenter’s recommendations?

Are references accurate, adequate, and balanced?

Does the presentation add to nursing knowledge?

What applications do you see for the content of this presentation to your practice as an NP?

Your peer posts should add to the dialogue or ask questions about the presentation.

Responses to two different peer presentations are due by Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 8.

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

DISCUSSION CONTENT

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NR 505 Advanced Research Methods Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments