NR 505 Week 5 Assignment

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NR 505 Week 5 Assignment
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Your Research Literature, Design, Sampling and Implementation assignment is due this week no later than Sunday 11:59PM MT. You can find the guidelines and rubric (an explanation of how you will be graded) listed below as well in the Documents section of Course Resources. This is a required Turnitin Assignment for this course.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment Purpose:

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue development of a MSN EBP scholarly project that started with the identification of a nursing concern and PICOT/PICo question from Week 2. The focus of this assignment is to discuss the research-based literature support for the selected concern, identify an appropriate research design, explain the sampling method, and discuss implementation through the use of a change model.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment Course Outcome:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO 1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1)

CO 2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare. (PO 2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Five

Total Points Possible: 250 points

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment Requirements

Description of the Assignment: This continues the development of a MSN EBP scholarly project by requiring the student to identify the additional elements of the process. The required elements are noted to be:

  • Research Literature Support (NOTE: Fifteen research-based references related to PICOT/PICo question are required)
  • Research Approach and Design
  • Sampling
  • Intervention

Criteria for Content

  1. Research Literature Support:In this section, comprehensive research literature support for the identified nursing concern and PCIOT/PICo question is to be provided. A minimum of fifteen (15)research-based references are required. The use of a systematic research review article as a reference is NOT All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. The PICOT/PICOT question is restated before presenting the research literature support. For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed:
  • -Purpose of the research study
  • -Research approach that was used
  • -Data collection methods used
  • -Results of the research study
  • -One strength of the research study
  • -One limitation of the research study.
  • Research Approach and Design:In this section, the student will identify the research approach that he/she plans on using for the EBP project as being either quantitative or qualitative. In addition, if the selected approach is quantitative, the student needs to identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive. If the selected approach is qualitative, the student needs to identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, or historical. A description of the selected design is to be provided as well as rationale for its selection. In addition one advantage and one disadvantage to the selected design is to be identified and discussed. Required content includes:
  • -Identification of the research approach that the student plans on using as either quantitative or qualitative
  • -Identification of selected quantitative research design by indicating if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or   descriptive
  • -Identification of the selected qualitative design by indicating if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory,  or historical
  • -Description of the selected design
  • -Rationale for the selected design
  • -Identification of one advantage of the selected design
  • -Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected research approach/design
  • Sampling: In this section, the student will identify the sampling method to be used in order to obtain the necessary participants for the proposed EBP project. Discussion of participants’ rights as research subjects is also included. Required content includes:
  • -Describe the target population
  • -Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability
  • -Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including:
    • Sample size
    • Inclusion criteria
    • Exclusion criteria
  • -Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected sampling method
  • Proposed Implementation with a change model:In this section, the student will apply the PDSA Change Model as the method to implement the proposed EBP practice solution/change. The required content includes:
  • -Describe the PDSA Change Model
  • -Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change
  • -Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change
  • -Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project
  • -Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting
  • -Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The additional sections to the proposal are not exceed 20(twenty) Be sure to add all new references used in these sections to the reference list. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, headings, and reference page(s) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6thedition of the manual.
  3. Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOTbe used as
    NR 505 Week 5 Assignment

    NR 505 Week 5 Assignment

    scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com, .edu, and library websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. Please contact your faculty member for guidance concerning the acceptability of a website as a scholarly source. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved the use of the older reference.

  4. This assignment is the required submission to Turn It In™ (TII) for NR 505. To prepare for the final submission, students are encouraged to use the TII draft box located in the course modules. A similarity score of 24% or less is required for the final submission. Any other level of similarity index requires the student to revise the assignment before the due date and time. To allow sufficient time for revision, early submission of the assignment to TurnItIn™ is highly encouraged. The final submission will be graded by faculty. If the final TurnItIn™ report indicates that plagiarism has occurred, the Academic Integrity policy will be followed. Similarity scores of 25% or higher result in the implementation of the Academic Integrity Policy located in the Chamberlain College of Nursing Student Handbook.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment Rubric

Some Rubric (1)

Some Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Literature Support
75.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Restate the PICOT/PICo question • A minimum of fifteen (15) research-based references are required. • The use of a systematic research review article is not allowed. • All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. • For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed: o Purpose of the research study o Research approach that was used o Data collection methods used o Results of the research study o One strength of the research study o One limitation of the research study.

66.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Restate the PICOT/PICo question • A minimum of fifteen (15) research-based references are required. • The use of a systematic research review article is not allowed. • All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. • For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed: o Purpose of the research study o Research approach that was used o Data collection methods used o Results of the research study o One strength of the research study o One limitation of the research study.

60.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Restate the PICOT/PICo question • A minimum of fifteen (15) research-based references are required. • The use of a systematic research review article is not allowed. • All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. • For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed: o Purpose of the research study o Research approach that was used o Data collection methods used o Results of the research study o One strength of the research study o One limitation of the research study.

29.0 pts

Presentation of information in ONE or TWO of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Restate the PICOT/PICo question • A minimum of fifteen (15) research-based references are required. • The use of a systematic research review article is not allowed. • All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. • For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed: o Purpose of the research study o Research approach that was used o Data collection methods used o Results of the research study o One strength of the research study o One limitation of the research study.

0.0 pts

Presentation of information unsatisfactory in THREE or more of the following elements: • Restate the PICOT/PICo question • A minimum of fifteen (15) research-based references are required. • The use of a systematic research review article is not allowed. • All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. • For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed: o Purpose of the research study o Research approach that was used o Data collection methods used o Results of the research study o One strength of the research study o One limitation of the research study.

75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Approach and Design
40.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Identification if the research approach as quantitative or qualitative • Identification of selected quantitative research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive) • Identification of the selected qualitative design (phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical) • Description of the selected design • Identify a rationale for the selected design • Identification of one advantage of the selected design • Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about research approach/design

35.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Identification if the research approach as quantitative or qualitative • Identification of selected quantitative research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive) • Identification of the selected qualitative design (phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical) • Description of the selected design • Identify a rationale for the selected design • Identification of one advantage of the selected design • Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about research approach/design

32.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Identification if the research approach as quantitative or qualitative • Identification of selected quantitative research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive) • Identification of the selected qualitative design (phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical) • Description of the selected design • Identify a rationale for the selected design • Identification of one advantage of the selected design • Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about research approach/design

15.0 pts

Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Identification if the research approach as quantitative or qualitative • Identification of selected quantitative research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive) • Identification of the selected qualitative design (phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical) • Description of the selected design • Identify a rationale for the selected design • Identification of one advantage of the selected design • Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about research approach/design

0.0 pts

Presentation of information unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: • Identification if the research approach as quantitative or qualitative • Identification of selected quantitative research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive) • Identification of the selected qualitative design (phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical) • Description of the selected design • Identify a rationale for the selected design • Identification of one advantage of the selected design • Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about research approach/design

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample
40.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe the target population • Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability • Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including: o Sample size o Inclusion criteria o Exclusion criteria • Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure • Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure • Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about sampling method

35.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe the target population • Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability • Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including: o Sample size o Inclusion criteria o Exclusion criteria • Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure • Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure • Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about sampling method

32.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe the target population • Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability • Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including: o Sample size o Inclusion criteria o Exclusion criteria • Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure • Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure • Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about sampling method

15.0 pts

Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe the target population • Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability • Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including: o Sample size o Inclusion criteria o Exclusion criteria • Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure • Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure • Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about sampling method

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: • Describe the target population • Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability • Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including: o Sample size o Inclusion criteria o Exclusion criteria • Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure • Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure • Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent • Use scholarly reference(s) to support information about sampling method

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Implementation with a Change Model
35.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe the PDSA Change Model • Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change • Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change • Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project • Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting • Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

31.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe the PDSA Change Model • Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change • Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change • Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project • Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting • Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

28.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe the PDSA Change Model • Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change • Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change • Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project • Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting • Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

13.0 pts

Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe the PDSA Change Model • Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change • Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change • Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project • Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Describe the PDSA Change Model • Explain why this change model is best suited for implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change • Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implementing the proposed practice solution/change • Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project • Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting • Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specification
10.0 pts

This section included all of the following: • The added sections do not exceed 20 (twenty) pages • Scholarly nursing references related to this content are presented • A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

9.0 pts

This section included three of the following: • The added sections do not exceed 20 (twenty) pages • Scholarly nursing references related to this content are presented • A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

8.0 pts

This section included only two of the following: • The added sections do not exceed 20 (twenty) pages • Scholarly nursing references related to this content are presented • A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

4.0 pts

This section included only one of the following: • The added sections do not exceed 20 (twenty) pages • Scholarly nursing references related to this content are presented • A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

0.0 pts

This section included none of the following: • The added sections do not exceed 20 (twenty) pages • Scholarly nursing references related to this content are presented • A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Criteria
25.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error are present

22.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors are present

20.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA are present

10.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • body of paper (including margins headings, font etc), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA are present

0.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • body of paper (including margins headings, font etc), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors are present

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
10.0 pts

There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge, and APA formatting.

9.0 pts

There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge, and APA formatting.

8.0 pts

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge, and APA formatting.

4.0 pts

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge and APA formatting.

0.0 pts

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge and APA formatting.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
15.0 pts

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

13.0 pts

3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

12.0 pts

5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

6.0 pts

7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

15.0 pts
Total Points: 250.0
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

What Will You Get?

We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.

Premium Quality

Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.

Experienced Writers

Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.

On-Time Delivery

Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.

24/7 Customer Support

Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.

Complete Confidentiality

Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.

Authentic Sources

We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.

Moneyback Guarantee

Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.

Order Tracking

You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.

image

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

image

Trusted Partner of 9650+ Students for Writing

From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.

Preferred Writer

Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.

Grammar Check Report

Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.

One Page Summary

You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.

Plagiarism Report

You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.

Free Features $66FREE

  • Most Qualified Writer $10FREE
  • Plagiarism Scan Report $10FREE
  • Unlimited Revisions $08FREE
  • Paper Formatting $05FREE
  • Cover Page $05FREE
  • Referencing & Bibliography $10FREE
  • Dedicated User Area $08FREE
  • 24/7 Order Tracking $05FREE
  • Periodic Email Alerts $05FREE
image

Our Services

Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.

  • On-time Delivery
  • 24/7 Order Tracking
  • Access to Authentic Sources
Academic Writing

We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.

Professional Editing

We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.

Thorough Proofreading

We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.

image

Delegate Your Challenging Writing Tasks to Experienced Professionals

Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!

Check Out Our Sample Work

Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality

It May Not Be Much, but It’s Honest Work!

Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.

0+

Happy Clients

0+

Words Written This Week

0+

Ongoing Orders

0%

Customer Satisfaction Rate
image

Process as Fine as Brewed Coffee

We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.

See How We Helped 9000+ Students Achieve Success

image

We Analyze Your Problem and Offer Customized Writing

We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.

  • Clear elicitation of your requirements.
  • Customized writing as per your needs.

We Mirror Your Guidelines to Deliver Quality Services

We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.

  • Proactive analysis of your writing.
  • Active communication to understand requirements.
image
image

We Handle Your Writing Tasks to Ensure Excellent Grades

We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.

  • Thorough research and analysis for every order.
  • Deliverance of reliable writing service to improve your grades.
Place an Order Start Chat Now
image