NR 506 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 506 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 506 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 506 Week 1 Discussion: Barriers to Practice

Week 1Barriers to Practice

Discussion

Purpose

Discuss barriers to practice as an APN in one’s state from both a state and national perspective. Research methods to influence policy change from various forms of competition, state legislative and executive branches of government and interest groups.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Discuss the history of policy development and policy-making in nursing (CO1)

Examine different types of policy and their relationships to healthcare policy (CO1)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 506 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Explain current barriers to practice for advanced practice nurses (CO2)

Discuss health policy and methods of lifting barriers to practice (CO2)

Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 pm MT of Week 1

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 1 by 11:59 pm MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Saturday at 11:59 pm MT.

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Discussion

Using the readings from this week as well as reliable outside resources to:

Identify and describe practice barriers for all four APNs’ roles in your state and discuss these barriers on a state and national level. The four roles include the nurse midwife, nurse anesthetist, nurse practitioner, and clinical nurse specialist.

Identify forms of competition on the state and national level that interfere with APNs’ ability to practice independently.

Identify the specific lawmakers by name at the state level (i.e., key members of the state’s legislative branch and executive branch of government)

Discuss interest groups that exist at the state and national levels that influence APN policy.

Discuss methods used to influence change in policy in forms of competition, state legislative and executive branches of government, and interest groups.

A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Practice Barriers 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence describes APN barriers to practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Competition 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating the forms of competition to APN practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Key Law Makers 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Interest Groups 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Methods to Influence Change 15 15%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers.

Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
75 75%

Total CONTENT Points = 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points = 25 pts
100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL = 100 pts

NR 506 Week 3 Assignment: Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP Performance

Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP Performance

Faculty Assignment Orientation Presentation

Access the Webex RecordingLinks to an external site.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to have students research the measurement tools of NP performance. Through the use of quality patient outcomes, students will list and discuss three different patient interventions and how they would specifically measure the outcomes, and how these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. In addition, students will discuss how these interventions result in improved patient ratings.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles (CO1)

Critically analyze how healthcare systems and APRN practice are organized and influenced by ethical, legal, economic, and political factors (CO2)

Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of advanced practice nursing in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings (CO3)

Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies and advanced practice leadership (CO4)

Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice (CO5)

Due Date: Sunday of week 3 by 11:59 PM MST

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with a penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Preparing the Assignment

The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) was formed to ensure the quality of patient care and measurement of patient outcomes with set standards.

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is a performance measurement tool used by millions of health insurance plans. There are 6 domains of care:

Effectiveness of Care

Access/Availability of Care

Experience of Care

Utilization and Risk Adjusted Utilization

Health Plan Descriptive Information

Measures Collected Using Electronic Clinical Data Systems

You may access the 6 domains of care by clicking this link:

(NCQA, n.d. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/Links to an external site.)

As an APN, productivity will be an important measurement for the practice to determine reimbursement and salary. Fee-for-service practices will require a set number of patients per day to maintain productivity. A capitated practice will require the APN to have a large panel of patients but also will focus on controlling costs. This can be accomplished through effective primary care that is accessible, convenient for the patients, and has a method of measuring the quality of care.

Write a formal paper in APA format with a title page, introduction, the three required elements below, conclusion, and reference page.

You are now employed as an NP in primary care. Choose one performance measure from one of the six domains of care, i.e. Adult BMI Assessment, Prenatal, and Postpartum care, etc.

Develop three different patient interventions for that one performance measure and how you would specifically implement the intervention and measure the outcomes for that particular performance measure in clinical practice.

How would these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and healthcare cost savings?

How can these interventions result in improved NP patient ratings?

Category Points % Description

List and discuss three different patient interventions and how you would specifically measure the outcomes.

60 30%

From the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) website discuss three patient interventions for the one performance measure.

Develop a measurement tool to track patient outcomes.

How would these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice?

60 30%

Discuss how the interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice.

How can these interventions result in improved patient ratings?

60 30%

Discuss how these interventions can result in improved patient ratings (an NP’s patient scorecard).
180 90%

Total CONTENT Points = 180 pts

Clarity of Writing

10 5%

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

APA Format

10 5%

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.
20 10%

Total FORMAT Points = 20 pts

200 100%

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points

Rubric

NR506NP WK3 Quality Healthcare Paper_SEPT19

NR506NP WK3 Quality Healthcare Paper_SEPT19

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Interventions

From the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) website, discuss three patient interventions for one performance measure.
60 pts

Excellent

Provides detailed information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be measured. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.

54 pts

V. Good

Provides some information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be measured. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources.

48 pts

Satisfactory

Provides non- specific information on three patient interventions and how they could specifically be measured. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

Lacks detailed information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be measured. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not provide information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be measured. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Care Interventions

Discuss how these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice.
60 pts

Excellent

Provides detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.

54 pts

V. Good

Provides some information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources.

48 pts

Satisfactory

Provides non- specific information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources.

30 pts

Needs Improvement

Lacks detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not provide information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Ratings

Describe how these interventions result in improved patient ratings.

60 pts

Excellent

Provides detailed information regarding how these interventions may result in improved patient ratings. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.

54 pts

V. Good

Provides some information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient ratings.

48 pts

Satisfactory

Provides non-specific specific information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient ratings. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources/

30 pts

Needs Improvement

Lacks detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient ratings. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not provide information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient ratings. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing

10 pts

Excellent

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning

9 pts

V. Good

Good use of standard English showing original thought. No more than two spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

8 pts

Satisfactory

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than six spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing APA format, grammar, spelling, and punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

10 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

9 pts

V. Good

2-4 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

8 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions
0 pts

Total Points: 200

NR 506 Week 4 Assignment: Kaltura Health Policy Analysis

Kaltura Health Policy Analysis

Assignment

Purpose

This assignment will focus on developing a health policy analysis presentation that includes a problem statement, background, landscape, options, and recommendations from the week’s readings. The health policy analysis presentation is based on an identified healthcare issue in one’s local community.

Activity Learning Outcome

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles (CO1)

Critically analyze how healthcare systems and APRN practice are organized and influenced by ethical, legal, economic, and political factors (CO2)

Analyze social, historical, ethical and political contexts of healthcare policies and advanced practice leadership (CO4)

Advocate for institutional, local, national and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice (CO5)

Due Date: Sunday by 11:59 pm MT of week 4

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Requirements

Click to view:

Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Develop a PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes. You will then use the PowerPoint during your Kaltura recording. Structure a health policy analysis presentation that addresses the following topics particular to your health problem:

Problem Statement

Background

Landscape

Options

Recommendations

Next, record your Kaltura presentation showing your PowerPoint and yourself speaking. Upload your Kaltura presentation into the week 4 assignment. How to use Kaltura resources are in Home/Resources/Technology Resources.

Posting your recording:

Go to the week four assignment tab and hit Submit Assignment

Use the Text Entry Tab. You will have the option of selecting the Kaltura icon.

It will take you to your My Media Gallery and upload it from there.

Hello and welcome all to this presentation on the week bore assignment, Health, Policy Analysis, culture presentation, and enter Bible six and p. I am Dr. John, the SLR. I am Course Leader PR and our Bible six and p. Full-time faculty and professor. This orientation will help you understand how to complete the assignment, to understand where the health policy analyses are. And so let’s go through the requirements for the assignment, then we’ll talk about specific. So great. In the Week Four assignment area, you will see the overview. Be researching healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Included, we have included many examples. They are, well, imagine yourself as a family nurse practitioner, primary care practice. You’ll notice a trending healthcare issue in your local community. You think to yourself, somebody has to do something about it. And in fact, that is you as an NP leader mirror community. Choosing a health care issue common in your local area gets you involved in the health of your community, something you will be doing as a practicing nurse practitioner. This assignment is not a patient treatment plan by the health policy analysis about that particular healthcare issue. This is very important. Other, more about the requirements, you’ll be developing a PowerPoint presentation offline. And it’ll be structuring and health policy analysis presentation that addresses the following topics, particular to your health problem. Referring to title bomb techs chapter 14 is essential. And on page 279 of that text, it goes through each parts of the health policy analysis, including the problem statement, background, landscape, options, and recommendations. These are the sections of your PowerPoint that you will be needing to fill in. Once you’ve completed the PowerPoint will you will then use culture, a software to record the presentation. A little, be a video of you presenting. Your PowerPoint is you run through the slides when of course your microphone. Greater recording resources are located in home and resources and then technology resources in the course. So let’s start by some definitions. And again, health policy analysis. He’s not a patient plan of care. So again, definitions, definition of a policy analysis. It’s an analysis that provides informed advice to a client that relates to a public policy decision. A decision included that in the course of action or inaction is framed by the clients powers and values. Let’s talk about power for a moment. The power is, does your client actually had the power to do it in value is why is it meaningful to the client? So again, on page 279 of the title, mom texts this brief definitions of all the components of a policy analysis. But now let’s take a look at a more in depth. Beginning, of course, with a problem statement and it defines the problem being addressed in the analysis, typically written in question format and maybe one or two sentences. The title bom, bom tax has multiple examples. The problem statement can be broad or narrow, but for the purposes of this assignment, statement should be much more narrow. Broad problem statements. Take a look at the big picture. Your goal for this assignment assist, help start by solving a health care issue in your local community and you will be saving the world another day. So again, I’m more of a narrow focus. It isn’t tasting to include recommendations in the problem statement, but this should be avoided. So for instance, a problem statement says, drug abuse can be solved by doing these things. You’re operating recommendations and that should be avoided. So now let’s take a look at some problem statements from students that have had in the past. So you have a better a better understanding for nurse practitioners. Decreased, rising drug abuse in the local community and promote recovery. How can mental help access achieved them? Self-score community? What action should you can take to reduce occurences of opioid abuse? What actions will help decrease the incidence of bad lesson tobacco use including beeps. And how can NPS helped to reduce opioid overdose in Camden, New Jersey? So as you read these, you’re seeing, you’re seeing this is not a treatment, but this is prevention. This is primary care prevention. As a family nurse practitioner working in an outpatient family practice, this is exactly what you will be doing, is you’ll be preventing, is it’s, it’s a much law plus expensive and certainly a lot better for your patients to prevent the problems from occurring as opposed to having happened to treat them. Then next is background, and this section provides information not an analysis of the problem, is use layout future options section is factual information that shows a complete picture of the health care issue. It also shows why the issue is important and must be addressed immediately. This section is not partisan or argumentative, that only lays out the facts. Oftentimes with statistics from reliable sources. And I wrote on the next slide, I’ve included some examples. These are very statistical. Come, they come from reliable sources within text references. You can, counties located in Michigan provides the population they are in a particular year. 1993 to 90 to 2014, obesity nutrition rates increased from 11.7%. I’ll read one more is 2628.6% of the valves and can founding world BCE. So again, this is statistical information that used to help to understand the breadth and depth of a health care issue in a local community. Now let’s talk about landscape. Landscape is often tied into the background, in, into the background. But as I’ve stated the background section, the factual information model landscape shows contexts. Contacts is shown by identifying key stakeholders and key factors that must be considered for your health care problem. Stakeholders. As you read, research your healthcare problem, you’ll start to understand who the key stakeholders are. And at some point we’ll have an exhaustive list. There is no required number of stakeholders. You will then outline their correlation to the problem. Let’s take a look at the title mom texts page to A13. And if we look at 283 at the top left, here are some examples of some key stakeholders. Perhaps a politician or are your state’s legislature or and governors. Pharmaceutical industry, health insurance industry, AARP and other elder rights groups, advocacy groups with sable, pharmacists lobby or on pharmaceutical companies and internet based pharmaceutical companies. Key stakeholders and may have a positive or negative impact on the health care issue. Let’s take a look at age 284, box 14, dash one. And you can see possible factors to include in a lanky key that faction is include political factors, social factors, economic factors, legal factors, and practical factors. Well, that’s a good area to start to understand. Once you’ve identified your problem statement, you can start taking a look at these factors and help you develop your landscape through your presentation. Once you’ve completed that, it’s time to look at the options. Now based upon the facts from the background in contexts, from the landscape, it is time to develop options. Page to 85 of the title bomb plaque shows places May 1 look for possible options. The bottom left might be for media, scholarly articles, interest group recommendations. Then take experts in the field, congressional testimony, legislation, whether it’s pastor pending and propose an agency reports. Again, the options talks about the power of the client and the value of the choir. A little bit more about that before we go on for the purpose of this assignment, Scarlatti, outside sources are especially peer-reviewed. Journal articles are required. The options that you will discuss are typically three to five, gives the client some choice of what to do about the health care problem. In this case, a client may most likely will include many of the stakeholders that you’ve discussed. Depending upon that healthcare 100 thousand and pay 286 and title bomb techs provides examples of auction criteria. We look, they’re able 14 dash two. You’ll see some sense sample option criterion. Again, it’s again going to be very particular to your healthcare issue. Now onto recommendations. Finally, this time to choose recommendations based upon the data you presented thus far. The title mom texts states to choose one. However, since you will be discussing a specific health care problem, for the purpose of the purposes of this assignment, multiple recommendations may be chosen and discuss. Again, depending upon the healthcare issue, providing pro and con lists may be appropriate, or perhaps a list of recommendations that may hae a priority bless pursued this and then this after evaluating the effects of the first intervention. That concludes this assignment Orientation, please be sure to reach out to your faculty with any questions or issues that may have enjoyed assignment. It is a great primer for new graduates to get involved in the local community. Thank you. And I hope you enjoyed the this assignment.

Category Points % Description

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Structure a health policy analysis presentation that addresses the following topics particular to your health problem.

Problem Statement

Background

Landscape

Options

Recommendations

150 75%

Research healthcare issues that are present in one’s local community.

Develop a ppt. offline that addresses the topics according to the criterion listed.
150 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 150 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Kaltura recording

50 25%

Uses Kaltura to record the presentation.
50 25%

Total FORMAT Points = 50 pts
200 100%

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = [150] + [50] points

Rubric

NR506NP_WK 4 Health Policy Analysis_SEPT19

NR506NP_WK 4 Health Policy Analysis_SEPT19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHealth Problem Presentation

Structure a health policy analysis presentation that addresses the following topics particular to your health problem.

• Problem Statement

• Background

• Landscape

• Options

• Recommendations

150 pts

Excellent

The recorded presentation includes the following required components: • Problem Statement • Background • Landscape • Options • Recommendations • More than one evidence-based strategy is discussed regarding health policy analysis. Accurately and specifically addresses each component.

135 pts

V. Good

The recorded presentation is missing one required component and some topics are addressed in a general manner without specific examples.

125 pts

Satisfactory

The recorded presentation is missing two required components and has limited perspective, insights and/or applicability to topic.

75 pts

Needs Improvement

The recorded presentation is missing three or more required components and has limited perspectives, insights and/or applicability to the topic.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No presentation is posted
150 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKaltura Recording
50 pts

Excellent

Required Components 1.The recorded presentation has clear audio/video. 2.Student professionally dressed. 3.The content flows in a logical, smooth manner. 4.Verbal pauses are limited or absent. 5.Transitions are used between topics. 6.Slides are clear and easy to read. 7.Student makes good eye contact and speaks in a clear cadence and speed. 8.Speaker notes are not included on the slide presentation but are used as a guide as students present.

45 pts

V. Good

The recorded presentation is lacking two components.

41 pts

Satisfactory

The recorded presentation is lacking three to four components.

25 pts

Needs Improvement

The presentation presents findings are unclear to follow and are not relevant to topics and concepts and are difficult to follow. Missing greater that five components.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No presentation is posted

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions
0 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext

NR 506 Week 5 Discussion: Ethical and Legal Implications

Ethical and Legal Implications

Discussion

Purpose

Discuss potential complications in a clinical scenario at an outpatient family practice. Students will explore potential effects on patient outcomes and implications for members of the health care team as a result of conflict among the healthcare team. Students will develop strategies that result in the prevention of untoward outcomes that result in a positive practice culture.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Recognize potential areas of conflict in NP clinical practice (CO1)

Determine methods of data collection to assess the conflict (CO3)

Examine corporate compliance and its effect on clinical practice (CO2)

Understand risk management in clinical practice (CO4)

Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 PM MST of Week 5

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 5, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Discussion

You are a family nurse practitioner working in an outpatient primary care office of a large hospital system. The practice has been operating for over 15 years, and many of the administrative and clinical staff were hired when the practice opened. You have been in the practice for less than 3 months. In that short amount of time, you have witnessed several of the clinical staff engaging in heated arguments with each other, sometimes in patient areas. You overhear an argument occurring today between two staff. You pick up a patient’s chart and notice a very low blood pressure that the medical assistant failed to notify you about. When you confront the MA, she states that she was going to report the vital signs to you when she became engaged in the heated argument you overheard and forgot to notify you.

Unfortunately, this pattern of behavior is not unusual in this practice. Working with staff who cannot cooperate effectively can negatively influence your ability to spend time with patients, can impede the flow of patients through the office, and could impact patient safety.

Case Study Responses:

Analyze the case study for potential issues for members of the healthcare team from office conflict. Contrast the potential effects for each member of the healthcare team based on the required readings from the week. Discuss the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members:

Medical assistant

Nurse Practitioner

Medical Director

Practice

What strategies would you implement to prevent further episodes of potentially dangerous patient outcomes?

What leadership qualities would you apply to effect positive change in the practice? Focus on the culture of the practice.

A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT

Potential ethical & legal implications for healthcare team members

30 30%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Strategies to prevent further dangerous patient outcomes

30 30%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially dangerous patient outcomes. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Leadership qualities to effect positive change

15 15%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
75 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points= 25 pts

100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL= 100 pts

NR506NP WK 5 Org Change Discussion_MAR20

NR506NP WK 5 Org Change Discussion_MAR20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Case Study

Analyze the case study for potential issues for members of the healthcare team from office conflict. Contrast the potential effects for each member of the healthcare team based upon the required readings from the week. Discuss the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members:

• Medical assistant

• Nurse Practitioner

• Medical Director

• Practice
30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Potential Issues

Following the analysis of the potential issues for members of the healthcare team, develop strategies to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior.
30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions does not use scholarly inquiry does not state scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective Leadership Qualities

From the required readings for the week, discuss leadership qualities that would be effective to not only result in positive patient outcomes in the scenario but also would prevent further episodes of office conflict. Focus on the culture of the practice.

15 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

14 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

4 Required Elements:

• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.
20 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion

18 pts

V, Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

17 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, or APA noted.

4 pts

V, Good

2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

3 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation

0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days and/or faculty posts. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

Total Points: 100

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 506 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

NR 506 Week 6 Discussion: Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility

Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to identify the scope of practice in one’s state, including level of independence of practice, prescribing authority, any limitations of practice, process for obtaining licensure in your state, certification, and education requirements for licensure. Next, students will discuss how the level of independence of practice in their state, i.e., reduced, restricted or full practice, affects patients’ access to care in their local community.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Understand NP practice as defined by law (CO2)

Determine legislation as defined by legislation, statutes and regulations (CO2)

Identify barriers to ensuring patient’s rights (CO3)

Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 pm MST of Week 6

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 6, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Discussion

Discuss your state NP community in terms of scope of practice. Include your state’s scope of practice for NPs, including:

Level of independence of practice **In California, NPs are required to practice under Standardized Procedure Guidelines. If CA is your intended practice state, please provide details on how Standardized Procedures Guidelines are developed in California and an example of a California SPG.

Prescribing authority

Any limitations of practice

Process for obtaining licensure in your state

Certification and education requirements for licensure.

If you live in a restricted or reduced practice state, how has patient care been impacted in your local community by these barriers? For instance, is the ED used for primary care? Are the EDs overcrowded with long wait times? Are there urgent care clinics readily available? Is there adequate access to primary care? If you live in a full practice, how has an independent practice of the APN resulted in improved patient access to healthcare?

How does access to NPs impact any healthcare disparities?

A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT

Scope of practice and NP requirements

30 30%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Practice barriers and access to healthcare

30 30%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Healthcare disparities

15 15%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

75 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points = 25 pts

100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL= 100 pts

NR506NP WK6 Scope of Practice Discussion_MAR20

NR506NP WK6 Scope of Practice Discussion_MAR20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScope of Practice

Discuss your state NP community in terms of scope of practice. Include the your state’s scope of practice for NPs including:

• Level of independence of practice

• Prescribing authority

• Any limitations of practice

• Process for obtaining licensure in your state

• Certification and education requirements for licensure.
30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFull vs. Restricted Practice

If you live in a restricted or reduced practice state, discuss how patient care has been impacted in your local community from these barriers.

If you live in a full practice state, discuss how independent practice of the APN resulted in improved patient access to healthcare.

30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccess & Healthcare Disparities

Discuss how access to NPs impact healthcare disparities.
15 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

14 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

Must demonstrate the following elements:

• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

(4 required elements)

20 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion

18 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

17 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

4 pts

V. Good

2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

3 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation

0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

Total Points: 100

NR 506 Week 7 Discussion: APNs as Healthcare Policy Leaders
APNs as Healthcare Policy Leaders

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the healthcare policy of the APN profession and how Transformational Leadership can help to influence policy changes. This week’s assignment focuses on the APN as a Health Policy Leader, one of the nine NONPF NP competencies. Students will analyze how health policy may affect NP practice and how Transformational Leadership can help to influence policy changes.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Critically analyze how healthcare systems and APRN practice are organized and influenced by ethical, legal, economic, and political factors (CO2)

Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of advanced practice nursing in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings (CO3)

Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice (CO4)

Due Date: Wednesday of week 7 by 11:59 PM MST

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Friday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 7, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Friday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Discussion

Criteria for Content

Explanation of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession

Explanation of why advocacy is considered an essential component of the advance practice nurse’s role

Discuss the four pillars of Transformational leadership and the effect they may have on influencing policy change

A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT

Explanation of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession

25 25%

Research healthcare policy for APNs on a state and national level and the impact on the APN profession

Explanation of why advocacy is considered an essential component of the advance practice nurse’s role

25 25%

Describe advocacy in healthcare terminology.

Discuss how advocacy is an essential role of the APN and its impact on patient care.

Discuss the four pillars of Transformational leadership and the effect it may have on influencing policy change

25 25%

Define Transformational leadership.

Discuss how Transformational Leadership may affect influencing policy change

75 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points = 25 pts
100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL= 100 pts

NR506NP WK7 Health Policy Discussion_MAR20

NR506NP WK7 Health Policy Discussion_MAR20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Impact on APN

Explanation of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse professio

25 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

22 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

19 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdvocacy

Explanation of why advocacy is considered an essential component of the advance practice nurse’s role

25 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of why advocacy is an essential component of advanced practice nurse role. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

22 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of why advocacy is an essential component of advanced practice nurse role. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

19 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of why advocacy is an essential component of advanced practice nurse role. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of why advocacy is an essential component of advanced practice nurse role. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePillars of Transformational Leadership

Discuss the four pillars of Transformational leadership and the effect it may have on influencing policy change
25 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of Transformational Leadership and the effects it may have on influencing policy change. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

22 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of Transformational Leadership and the effects it may have on influencing policy change. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

19 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of Transformational Leadership and the effects it may have on influencing policy change. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions does not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of Transformational Leadership and the effects it may have on influencing policy change. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

Must demonstrate the following elements:

• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

(4 required elements)

20 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion

18 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

16 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 four errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

4 pts

V. Good

2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

3 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Tuesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days and/or faculty posts. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts

Total Points: 100

NR 506 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes

Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes

Discussion

Purpose

The final week will focus on Global Policy Reform and its impact on patient care. Students read the Berwick article and respond to the required discussions. In addition, students reflect on what they have learned in NR506NP and how it is applicable to their upcoming clinical courses.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Understand the role of advanced practice nursing in the International Context (CO2)

Research global aspects of healthcare and the effect on the US healthcare system (CO5)

Discuss the implications of global health on your clinical practice (CO5)

Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 pm MT of week 8

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Monday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 8 by 11:59 PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Wednesday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Berwick, D., Snair, M., & Nishtar, S. (2018). Crossing the global health care quality chasm: A key component of universal health coverage. Journal of American Medical Association, 320(13), 1317-1318.

Read the Berwick article and reflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Reflections should include the following:

How to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis.  In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience. 

Describe how one will apply content from NR506NP to the upcoming clinical courses.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT

Making informed decisions

40 40%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry, sharing insights as to how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Application to Clinical Practice

35 35%

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry stating how one may apply content learned in this course to future clinical practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
75 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts

DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points= 25 pts
100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL= 100 pts

NR506NP WK8 Reflection_Mar20

NR506NP WK8 Reflection_Mar20
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMaking informed decisions
40 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry sharing insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

36 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry, sharing insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

32 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry sharing insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry on sharing insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry sharing insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication to Clinical Practice
35 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry stating how one may apply content learned in this course to future clinical practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

33 pts

V. Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry stating how one may apply content learned in this course to future clinical practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

29 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state how content learned in this course is applicable to future clinical practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

18 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how content learned in this course is applicable to future clinical practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry as to how content learned in this course is applicable to future clinical practice. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

(4 Required Elements)

20 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion

18 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

17 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

4 pts

V. Good

2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

3 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Tuesday of week 1 by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Wednesday at 11:59pm MT.

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Wednesday at 11:59pm MT.
0 pts

Total Points: 100