NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

NR 599 Week 2 Discussion: Organizational Change and Ethical-Legal Influences in Advanced Practice Nursing Case Study

Hi Class,

Week 2

Welcome to week two!

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

In week one you had the opportunity to identify barriers to practice in your state as well as specific information on the law makers, interest groups and how you might influence change to barriers to practice. This is a great way to begin to understand the political climate in your state and the impact on independent practice.

In week two, we move away from healthcare policy for a bit and take a look at organizational change and ethical-legal influences in advanced practice nursing. The case study discussion offers a clinical scenario where unethical and potentially illegal behaviors are identified from one member of the healthcare team. Through the readings and your interactions with peers and faculty, you explore the following:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members as a result of unethical and illegal behaviors

· Medical assistant

· Nurse Practitioner

· Medical Director

· Practice

Strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior.

Leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice, especially the culture of the practice.

Your initial response is due by Wednesday of week two by 11:59 PM MST. In addition, two other posts to peers and / or faculty are required and must be posted by Sunday of week two by 11:59PM MST. Please refer to the syllabus for complete details on posting requirements and late assignment policies.

Please make sure for the discussion posts, you use a resource to support each part of the rubric criteria for full points.

Organizational Change and Ethical-Legal Influences in Advanced Practice Nursing Case Study

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to discuss organizational changes and ethical-legal influences in a clinical scenario at an out-patient family practice. Students will explore potential effects on patient outcomes and ethical and legal implications for members of the heath care team as a result of illegal behaviors. Students will develop strategies that result in prevention of untoward outcomes that result in a positive practice culture.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Demonstrate effective leadership styles in the management of organizational change (CO3)

Interpret various forms of ethical theories and application into practice (CO4)

Discuss practice guidelines and malpractice prevention (CO2)

Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 pm MST of Week 2

Initial responses to the discussion topic must be posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Two additional posts to peers and/or faculty are due by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 2, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Discussion

You are a family nurse practitioner employed in a busy primary care office. The providers in the group include one physician and three nurse practitioners. The back office staff includes eight medical assistants who assist with patient care as well as filing, answering calls from patients, processing laboratory results and taking prescription renewal requests from patients and pharmacies. Stephanie, a medical assistant, has worked in the practice for 10 years and is very proficient at her job. She knows almost every patient in the practice, and has an excellent rapport with all of the providers.

Mrs. Smith was seen today in the office for an annual physical. Her last appointment was a year ago for the same reason. During this visit, Mrs. Smith brought an empty bottle of amoxicillin with her and asked if she could have a refill. You noted the patient’s name on the label, and the date on the bottle was 1 week ago. You also noted your name printed on the label as the prescriber. The patient admitted that she called last week concerned about her cough and spoke to Stephanie. You do not recall having discussed this patient with Stephanie nor do the other providers in the practice.

Case Study Questions:

What are the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members?

Medical assistant

Nurse Practitioner

Medical Director

Practice

What strategies would you implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior?

What leadership qualities would you apply to effect a positive change in the practice?â€¯ Be thinking about the culture of the practice.

A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Category Points % Description
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Potential ethical & legal implications for healthcare team members 30 30% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Strategies to prevent further conflict 30 30% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Leadership qualities to effect positive change 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
75 75%

Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue 20 20%

4 Required Elements:

Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25%

Total FORMAT Points = 25 pts
100 100%

DISCUSSION TOTAL = 100 pts

NR506NP WK 2 Org Change Discussion_MAR20

NR506NP WK 2 Org Change Discussion_MAR20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Case Study

Analyze the case study for potential issues for members of the healthcare team from office conflict. Contrast the potential effects for each member of the healthcare team based upon the required readings from the week. Discuss the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members:

• Medical assistant

• Nurse Practitioner

• Medical Director

• Practice
30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the practice members. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Potential Issues

Following the analysis of the potential issues for members of the healthcare team, develop strategies to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior.
30 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

27 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions does not use scholarly inquiry does not state scholarly inquiry of strategies to implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective Leadership Qualities

From the required readings for the week, discuss leadership qualities that would be effective to not only result in positive patient outcomes in the scenario but also would prevent further episodes of office conflict. Focus on the culture of the practice.
15 pts

Excellent

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

14 pts

V, Good

Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of leadership qualities to apply to effect a positive change in the practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion did not include criteria.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

4 Required Elements:

• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;

• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.
20 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion

18 pts

V, Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

17 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, or APA noted.

4 pts

V, Good

2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

3 pts

Satisfactory

5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

8-9 errors grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation

0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days and/or faculty posts. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts

Total Points: 100

NR 599 Week 3 Discussion: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

Discussion

Purpose

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction. (CO 4)

Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. (CO 5)

Due Date

Students must post a minimum of 3 times in each graded discussion. The 3 posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days. Posting 3 times on 3 different days meets the minimum requirement for full credit; each post must be substantive. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 3. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 150

Preparing the Discussion

Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:

As discussed in the lesson and assigned reading for this week, EHRs provide both benefits and drawbacks. Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table and include at least 3 items for each list. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you selected to include it on the respective list.

Refer to the Stage 3 objectives for Meaningful Use located in this week’s lesson under the heading Meaningful Use and the HITECH Act. Select two objectives to research further. In your own words, provide a brief discussion as to how the objective may impact your role as an APN in clinical practice.

Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:

Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.

Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.

Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.

Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.

For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.

Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

DISCUSSION CONTENT

Category
Points

%
Description

Application of Course Knowledge
50

33%
The quality for this category is determined by the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lessons and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations.

Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources
40
27%

This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.

Interactive Dialogue
40
27%
The quality for this category is determined by substantive written responses to a peer and faculty member’s questions in the threaded discussion. Substantive posts add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion. Students must respond to least one peer in the threaded discussion. If no question asked directly from faculty, student must respond to questions posed to the entire class. Post must include at least one scholarly source.
Total CONTENT Points= 130

DISCUSSION FORMAT

Category
Points
%

Description

Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format

20
13%
Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion
Total FORMAT Points = 20

DISCUSSION TOTAL = 150 Points

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR 599 Week 4 Assignment: MidWeek Comprehension Questions

DETAILS

Purpose

Information literacy is critically important for all nurses, especially APNs. APNs must be able to determine what information is needed, find the information, critique the information, provide care based on this information, and evaluate the outcomes of the process. Sound challenging? Continue to reflect upon strategies to facilitate this process. Provide a brief response (100 words or less)

Class,

Welcome to Week 4. It is hard to believe we are already halfway through this course. Our focus this week is on information literacy and patient engagement. Information literacy refers to the use of digital technology to locate, navigate, manage, integrate, evaluate, create, and effectively communicate in a rapidly changing healthcare environment. Technology extends our capabilities to care for patients and provides access to information and knowledge beyond our individual abilities to know. Of course, access to information is not limited to healthcare providers. As consumers of healthcare, patients must also demonstrate information literacy. As such, APNs have due diligence to extend their knowledge of information literacy to guide and assist the public.

Week 4 is guided by the following Course Outcome(s)

CO 2: Demonstrate synthesis of nursing and non-nursing science with information and computer technologies through collaborative advanced nursing practice (PO 3)

CO 4: Exemplify professional values and scholarship to support professional and personal development (PO 5)

Your graded assignment this week is the Midterm exam. Questions on the exam come directly from the lessons and assigned reading. Please be familiar with the dus browser as well as the Academic Integrity policy on performing an adequate environment scan BEFORE starting the exam.

As always, reach out to me with any questions, issues, or concerns.

NR 599 Week 5 Discussion: Clinical Decision Support Systems

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Discussion

Purpose

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)

Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)

Due Date

Students must post a minimum of 3 times in each graded discussion. The 3 posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days. Posting 3 times on 3 different days meets the minimum requirement for full credit; each post must be substantive. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible: 150

Preparing the Assignment

Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:

This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.

The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for you to be innovative, so have fun!

Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:

Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.

Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.

For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.

DISCUSSION CONTENT

NR 599 Week 6 Discussion: Midweek Comprehension Questions

Discussion

Purpose

As mentioned in this lesson, numerous telecommunications-ready tools are already available to assist nurses in delivering care and improving patients’ health outcomes. New and innovative tools are rapidly making it to the marketplace, making current tools dated and sometimes obsolete. Continue to reflect upon the point-of-care tools you may be familiar with using in your role as a Registered Nurse and how your responsibilities will change with your future role as an APN. How will you stay current? Provide a brief response (100 words or less)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

NR 599 Week 6 Assignment: Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

Assignment

Purpose

The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) demonstrate nursing informatics skills to critique commonly used mobile applications, (b) synthesize nursing and non-nursing knowledge using a guided appraisal process, and (c) develop NI skills with computer technologies to support professional and personal development with implementation of medical applications in clinical practice.

Mobile Health, also known as mHealth, is defined as the use of wireless communication to support efficiency in public health and clinical practice. To facilitate mHealth, mobile applications (apps) have been developed, which can be executed either on a mobile platform or on a web-based platform which is executed on a server. Mobile medical apps are often accessories to a FDA-regulated medical device. Incumbent upon each healthcare provider is a clear understanding of the implications of this guidance on clinical practice as well as demonstrate discretion with regard to medical app implementation.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Demonstrate synthesis of nursing and non-nursing science with information and computer technologies through collaborative advanced nursing practice (PO 5)

CO 4: Exemplify professional values and scholarship to support professional and personal development (PO 1)

Due Date

This assignment is due no later than the Sunday of Week 6 by 11:59 PM MT. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Preparation and Paper Outline:

1. PART 1: The medical application selection for this assignment is contingent upon the month of your birthday. Use the table below to identify the Medical App for this assignment.

Your Birth Month Medical App for Assignment
January, February MDCalc
March, April, May Medscape
June, July, August The Chief Complaint
September, October Pocket Pharmacist(PocketRx)
November, December SingleCare
Use the Google Play Store for Android devices or the Apple iTunes App Store for Apple devices to search for the medical application as determined by the table above.

In order to complete the following guided appraisal, download the app to a mobile device (smartphone or tablet). The apps are free and do not require purchase to complete this assignment.

Provide proof of download by attaching a screenshot of the device screen in JPEG or PDF format to the assignment upload tab (in addition to submitting this assignment). Following the general instructions below for smartphone devices (specific device instructions may vary):

Android 4.0 and Newer: (Galaxy SIII, Galaxy S 4, Galaxy Note, HTC One,â€¯Nexus phones, Droid phones)

Any Android phone running Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) or later can easily take a screenshot. Hold theâ€¯Powerâ€¯andâ€¯Volume Downâ€¯buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in yourâ€¯Galleryâ€¯app, usually inside theâ€¯Screenshotsâ€¯folder

iPhone

The method for taking a screenshot in iOS has been the same since version 2.0. Hold the Power (Sleep/Wake) and Home buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Photos app under Camera Roll.

2. PART 2: Answer the Medical App Critical Appraisal questions thoughtfully and comprehensively. Use the criteria headings on this outline as the headings on your properly APA- formatted paper.

NAME: What is the name of the app?

AUTHOR: Who created, developed, or maintains the app? Explain.

ENDORSEMENT: Is the app licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, other government agency, or endorsed by an academic institution or medical professional organization? Explain.

OPERATION: Which platform (mobile or web-based) is suitable for the app and why?

AESTHETICS: Is the information displayed in a way that is easy to navigate? Is it easy to use? Can you use it without instructions? Explain.

PURPOSE: What is the intended purpose or use of the app?

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: What influence does the app have on clinical decision making? Explain.

SAFETY: Is there potential for patient harm? Explain.

PRIVACY/SECURITY: Does the app have privacy statement or setting? Is there a clear privacy policy stating information will be encrypted and not shared with third parties? Does the app share information on social networks? Are users notified in the event of a breach of privacy and health information? Explain.

USER: For whom is the app intended (providers, patients, or others)? Explain.

DISTRIBUTION: Is it designed for local use or wider distribution? Explain.

CREDIBILITY: How credible are the sources of information? How do you know? Explain.

RELEVANCE: How current is the information in the app? When was the last update? Is the content consistent with evidence-based literature or best practices/standards of care? Explain.

3. PART 3: Provide one example of an appropriate patient or clinical scenario for this app. The example should include the following details:

Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric)

Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility)

History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition

Provide a detailed description of the app in your example. When will the app be implemented (at the Point-of-care or elsewhere)? Who will use the app? What potential impact will it have on the scenario? Incorporate the critical appraisal information from Part 2. Provide one evidence-based scholarly article as a reference to support clinical decision-making.

4. This assignment will be graded on the quality of the information, inclusion of one evidence-based scholarly resource, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details in Part 1).

5. The length of the paper is to be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.

6. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”

7. APA format is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation. See resources under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers” for further clarification.

* Scholarly Sources:â€¯Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These includeâ€¯peer-reviewedâ€¯publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org)â€¯can be countedâ€¯as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.â€¯ You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the availableâ€¯databasesâ€¯for a peer-reviewed journal article.â€¯â€¯The following sourcesâ€¯should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.â€¯ These websitesâ€¯are not consideredâ€¯scholarlyâ€¯as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.â€¯ Forâ€¯example,â€¯the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality.â€¯ It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site.â€¯ Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be publishedâ€¯with the last 5 years.â€¯ Instructor permissionâ€¯must be obtainedâ€¯BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Rubric

NR599_Week 6 Medical Application Critical Appraisal

NR599_Week 6 Medical Application Critical Appraisal
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 1 PART 1: Medical Application Selection, Download, and Proof of Download

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Student identified the medical application according to the table provided in the guidelines for the assignment

Downloaded the app to an appropriate mobile device

Provided clear proof of download

Screenshot of the device screen in JPEG or PDF format

(4 Required Elements)

30 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for Criterion

27 pts

V.Good

Missing 1 element for Criterion

25 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for Criterion

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for this Criterion Or Student selected the incorrect medical application according to the table provided in the guidelines for the assignment;

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion Or No assignment

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 2 PART 2 Critical Appraisal, Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Answered 13 out of 13 questions in PART 2 of the critical appraisal

Student demonstrated use of scholarly inquiry

Responses to guided appraisal questions were comprehensive, detailed, and specific

Demonstrated understanding of the intended use of the medical application

Conducted critical appraisal using a systematic approach

Incorporated at least one EBP scholarly source

(6 Required Elements)

80 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for Criterion

73 pts

V.Good

Did NOT address 1 question in PART 2 of the critical appraisal; Or Missing 1 element for the Criterion

66 pts

Satisfactory

Did NOT address 2 questions in PART 2 of the critical appraisal Or Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

40 pts

Needs Improvement

Did NOT address 3 or more questions in PART 2 of the critical appraisal Or Missing 3 elements for the Criterion Or No Scholarly Sources

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No assignment

80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 3 PART 3: Application of Knowledge and Clinical Implementation

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Constructed a clinical scenario which included all of the following: Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric),Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility), History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition

Provided a detailed description of the app used in the scenario

Incorporated the critical appraisal information in the scenario

Demonstrated synthesis of knowledge and critical reasoning skills relevant to the clinical role of an advanced practice nurse

(4 Required Elements)
60 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion

55 pts

V.Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

50 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

30 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Missing 4 elements for the Criterion Or No assignment
60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat Criterion 1 Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, APA Format, and Word Requirements

NOTE: Failure to comply with the word requirements for this assignment will result in the grade of zero (0) for this Criterion.
30 pts

Excellent

Grammar, spelling, syntax and/or APA format are accurate, or with zero to one error.

27 pts

V.Good

Two to three errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and/or APA format.

25 pts

Average

Four to five errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and/or APA format.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Six or seven errors grammar, spelling, syntax and/or APA format.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Eight or more errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or APA format Or Failure to comply with the word requirements for this assignment Or No assignment

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

0 pts

No Mark

0 pts

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. minus ______ points

0 pts

Total Points: 200

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NR 599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments