NR 707 Week 6 Assignment: Create a 3–5-minute video of yourself giving an oral presentation and description of the poster as you would in a public presentation, using the following guidelines:

NR 707 Week 6 Assignment: Create a 3–5-minute video of yourself giving an oral presentation and description of the poster as you would in a public presentation, using the following guidelines:

NR 707 Week 6 Assignment: Create a 3–5-minute video of yourself giving an oral presentation and description of the poster as you would in a public presentation, using the following guidelines:

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is to create a professional poster to disseminate your DNP evidence-based practice change project through a poster presentation at a national conference. For the Week 6 assignment, you will complete the revisions requested by your course faculty from the Week 3 Professional Poster Video Presentation Assignment and also record your audio and video. The video presentation should include a small video of you speaking in the corner of the poster while the audience can view the poster and hear you speaking. This progressive poster assignment begins in NR707 and is completed in NR709.

Instructions

Revise the Professional Poster Presentation from Week 3 using your faculty’s feedback. All requested revisions are required to receive full points for this assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside an AI report. Feel free to chat Us

( I’ll be sending the feedback from the Week 3 poster from the professor some time during week 5.) so please keep in mind of possible corrections.

Ensure that the required content in the rubric is included in your Week 6 Professional Poster Video Presentation assignment.

You can choose to create the video of your poster in PowerPoint presentation mode or Kaltura software. Review the following tutorials for assistance:

How To Add Audio and Video to a Poster in PowerPointLinks to an external site. (5:19)

KalturaLinks to an external site. (Student Resource Center)

Create a 3–5-minute video of yourself giving an oral presentation and description of the poster as you would in a public presentation, using the following guidelines:

Speech Presentation Quality

Visual Presentation

Speech is fluid with clear enunciation and appropriate volume (not too loud or too soft).

Communicate enthusiasm with varying intonation.

Avoid using slang.

Avoid reading the slide.

The total video time is between 3-5 minutes.

Include the following speaking points in your presentation:

Implementation Plan

While not included in the poster content, your speaking information should include a discussion about your weekly planned implementation activities for the entire implementation. Identify and describe the main activities or the milestones in the implementation plan and in what weeks those activities will occur. You can group the weeks if the activities are the same in those weeks.

Example: In weeks 2 through 8, the activities include intervention implementation, formative evaluation with feedback to stakeholders and

Clearly state which week the intervention implementation began.

State the length of time that the intervention will be implemented when the last outcome data is collected. The intervention is required to be implemented for at least 8 weeks before the last data is collected.

Clearly state the data collection plan.

Example: “The pre-intervention data were collected in week 1 using a Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) with 16 nurses working in the clinic. In week 9 of the intervention implementation, the post-intervention data will be collected using the Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) with the same 16 nurses.”

Evaluation

Provide a clear examination of the summative evaluation plan. (Note: This section discussion should only be about the summative evaluation. Do not address the formative evaluation in this section.) Include the following:

Describe what data is collected.

Explain how data will be collected.

Identify who is collecting the data.

State when the data will be collected for the summative evaluation. Detail the timeframe for the data collection pre- and post-intervention

If a data collection tool is used, identify the name of the tool, authors, and permission, and determine the validity of the tool.

Implications for Nursing and Healthcare

Summarize the implications for nursing and healthcare.

Week 6 Lesson

Dissemination of Scholarly Work

Dissemination of Scholarly Work

Dissemination of scholarly work is a key responsibility of the DNP practice scholar. The benefits are shared between the audience and the DNP practice scholar disseminating knowledge through posters, articles, and podium presentations. Dissemination supports the evidence on the topic and sometimes confirms previous results. Sharing scholarly knowledge supports other nurses in finding solutions to their clinical practice problems. Dissemination at the DNP practice scholar level will support other nurses in changing clinical outcomes across the nation and globally! Let’s all contribute to increasing the quality of healthcare globally!

There are many benefits to the dissemination of scholarly work through journal article publication. Nurses are at the bedside and in leadership and make notable contributions to health care and society. Sharing scholarship with other nurses across the nation and globally adds to our body of nursing science and improves professional practice. Journals are distributed widely and open-access journals provide broad readership while offering a concise format to distribute information efficiently. Sharing scholarship contributes to translation science, improving healthcare outcomes and, ultimately, humanity (Oermann, 2018).

Selecting a Publication

Bemker et al. (2021) and our Chamberlain Online Library (2021) recommend the following steps in selecting a journal for manuscript publication:

Determine your audience.

Look for a journal with that same audience.

Read the journal author guidelines to learn the formatting and submission requirements and to determine if that journal is publishing evidence-based practice change projects. If not, find another journal that matches your audience.

Are the article topics in the journal similar to your scholarly topic? If not, find another journal publishing similar topics that match your preferred audience.

Is the impact factor important? Choose the journal with the higher impact factor.

Ask the library for help with sourcing appropriate journals.

Use the guide from the Association of College and Research Libraries, which gives some additional information on evaluating journal quality and may help you in choosing a journal in which to publish. This toolkit is equipped with sources for scholarly publishing, research, copyright, data management, and more.

Link (website): Association of College and Research Libraries Scholarly Communication Toolkit: Evaluating Journals Links to an external site.

Write a query letter to the editor if the journal permits.

Click on each image in the following interactive for some tips on evaluating publications:

Determining Journal Quality Interactive

General Journal Information

There are a few considerations when determining the quality and validity of an open access publisher or a journal.

Read the author’s information about their journal in the “About Us” section of the website.

Locate the publication frequency. While many journals publish monthly, some publish quarterly and some twice each year.

Take note of the ownership of the organization and if the organization offers subscription and open-access articles. The business revenue sources should be discussed and should include subscription or fee for publication as well as advertisement revenue and other revenue sources.

Locate the editor names, affiliations, and contact information, which should be available on the website and easily accessed. The contact information for the editorial office should also be easy to find on the website. Take note of how long this organization has existed.

Take note of the name of the journal. If the name is very close to another journal name or can be easily confused, look for the history of the journal and how many years this journal has been in publication because this may be a sign that the organization is trying to look like the other popular journal.

Author Guidelines and the Peer-Review Process

The journal should clearly inform readers whether articles for publication are required to be peer-reviewed. The peer-review process includes subject matter experts reviewing the proposed article after it was submitted to the journal but before the article is approved to be published. Usually, the author must comply with requests for changes and edits before the article can be published. Some journals and repositories do not use a peer-review process. The journal should clearly state if the peer-review process is used and discuss the policies related to article review in detail. All this information should be easily available on the website. Usually the peer-review process and associated policies are in the author guidelines and may also be in other places on the website.

The journal website should also convey the fees for publication. Some journals have two fee options for publication. Open access articles are more expensive because the article is not in the subscription service, but rather the article will be available on the internet for everyone. Subscription journal articles are usually less expensive because the readers pay a subscription fee for the right to read those articles in that journal.

Governing Board, Policies, and Ethics

The journal website should also discuss the governing body and the members. The governing body members should be subject matter experts in that journal subject matter. The journal should disclose the names, affiliations, and expertise of the governing body members.

Locate the ethical standards and author guidelines.

The journal should clearly state how it handles conflicts of interest for authors, peer-reviewers, and for editors. The article copyright information should be clearly discussed in the author’s guidelines.

The journal should discuss how it handles research misconduct. Some examples of misconduct are fraudulent research, data manipulation, and plagiarism. All journals should state which guidelines they follow for dealing with research misconduct or ethical violations. Many journals use the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. If it is an open access journal, does the journal belong to the Open Access Scholarly Publisher’s Association (OASPA).

The journal should also state on their website the process for archiving and accessing articles should the journal go out of business or stop publishing. A popular way to do that is to send information to the organization called Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe (CLOCKSS) (ACRL, 2021).

Website Organization

Appraise the overall view of the website.

Is the website organized?

Is the information easily accessed or is it difficult to find the information?

Attribution

Note. Adapted from Scholarly Communication Toolkit: Evaluating Journals, by Association of College & Research Libraries, 2021 (https://acrl.libguides.com/scholcomm/toolkit/evaluating). Copyright 2021 American Library Association.

Use the following chart for additional targeted criteria about the journal you might select:

Criteria Yes/No

How important is this to your decision?

1=not

2=some

3=very

General Publication Info

Is it highly prestigious for your discipline?

Is it highly prestigious for your subfield?

Copyright and Usage

Does the journal allow you to present these data before the article goes to print?

Do you have ownership of the info before and after publication?

Can you present at conferences without restriction?

Can you use the article in course packets or online readings without paying licensing fees?

Author Fees and Guidelines

Are the author fees reasonable?

What would be a reasonable fee?

Is it a fast turnaround from submission to publication?

What is a reasonable amount of time?

What is the longest you have experienced?

Access

Does the library subscribe to it?

If not, why not?

Journal Selection Criteria

Click the following link to download and print this table:

Link (Word doc): Journal Selection CriteriaLinks to an external site.

Additional Resources

Medline IndexLinks to an external site.: Offers a listing of the many popular subscription service Journals

Open Access Journal listingLinks to an external site.: Offers a listing of the many popular open-access Journals

Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric

Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation Plan

Requirements:

1. Provide a weekly plan for the entire implementation. The main activities during the weeks of implementation are clearly discussed.

2. State which week the intervention implementation began.

3. State the length of time that the intervention will be implemented and when the last outcome data will be collected.

4. State when the pre and post-intervention data collection will occur during the implementation.

60 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth implementation plan.

54 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient implementation plan.

48 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial implementation plan.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the implementation plan.
60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation

Requirements:

Provides a clear discussion about the summative evaluation plan.

1. Describe what data is collected.

2. Discuss how data will be collected.

3. State who is collecting the data.

4. State when the data will be collected for the summative evaluation. Discuss the timeframe for the data collection pre and post-intervention.

5. If a data collection tool is used, discuss the name of the tool, authors, permission, and validity of the tool.

60 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth evaluation plan.

54 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient evaluation plan.

48 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial evaluation plan.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the evaluation plan.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications for Nursing and Healthcare

Requirement:

1. Summarize the implications for nursing and healthcare.

25 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary of implications.

22 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and/or provides a sufficient summary of implications.

20 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and/or provides a partial summary of implications.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the summary of implications.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Presentation Quality

Requirements:

1. Speech is fluid with clear enunciation and appropriate volume (not too loud or too soft).

2. Communicate enthusiasm with varying intonation.

3. Avoid using slang.

4. The total video time is between 3- 5 minutes.

5. No reading from the slides.

40 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent verbal presentation.

36 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient verbal presentation.

32 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial verbal presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped verbal presentation.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisions Completed from the Week 3 Poster

Requirements:

1. All revisions requested from the course faculty from the Week 3 assignment are completed.

25 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all revisions and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

22 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all revisions and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

10 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all revisions and/or provides a partial visual poster presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor visual poster presentation.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation

Requirements:

1. The video displays the poster clearly and legibly.

2. The video includes a small view or picture of you talking.
40 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all other requirements and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

36 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all other requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

32 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all other requirements and/or provides a partial visual poster presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor visual poster presentation.
40 pts

Total Points: 250