NR 707A Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 707A Week 1 Discussion: The Role of the DNP-Prepared Nurse as Project Manager

Purpose

This discussion aims to explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse as the project manager. A particular emphasis will be on project scope management and communication with stakeholders. During a project, problems are frequently related to the project scope and inadequate communication with stakeholders. Planning and implementing strategies to avoid scope creep and to provide ample stakeholder communication will support the project’s success.

Instructions

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 707A Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

All students respond to Part 1 and Part 2 every week. Use the numbered questions as headers in your response. Students who are implementing respond to Part 1 and Part 2—Implementing. Students who are conducting a case study respond to Part 1 and Part 2—Case Study.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 707A Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:

Scope creep can cause project failure, especially when the complexity of the healthcare environment changes and the increased needs of the patients, stakeholders, or organizations are pressing. Propose your strategies to ensure the project scope remains intact for the implementation duration.

Stakeholder communication is essential for a successful DNP practice change project. Explain your strategies for effective communication with stakeholders, including frequency and the method of communication. (For this discussion question, you may refer to our required article this week, Rajhans [2018], or other scholarly articles.)

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

Post the weekly details of your implementation plan so we can follow your implementation throughout this class. Include the dates for your project milestones (e.g., education, data collection cycles, enrollment, intervention implementation beginning, formative evaluation frequency, length of intervention implementation, transition to sustaining the practice change with stakeholders, and data analysis.)

Provide a detailed update on your implementation progress. Include an example(s) of successes, challenges, and barriers, and note any concerns.

You may use the example below for guidance as needed.
Week #: (date) Education and pre-implementation data collection, and stakeholder communication

Week #: (date) Intervention implementation and formative evaluation frequency, and stakeholder communication (Frequency and type of communication may vary depending on stakeholder group.)

Week #: (date) Data collection and stakeholder communication

Week #: (date) Data analysis and stakeholder communication

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format and include the week # for your implementation.

Create a detailed description of your case study project implementation. (Please note that the intervention must be implemented for a full 8 weeks in your case study plan).

Compose a detailed response to the following:

How has the pandemic affected organizational operations?

How did COVID-19 affect the development of your project?

Examine in detail how you will address these issues that could potentially occur:

Not all participants (staff and/or patients) attended as planned, and some staff were out sick. How will you follow up with them?

There are float nurses and traveler nurses on the unit. How will this impact your project plan?

Internet speed, access, and bandwidth are causing problems with the virtual meetings you have set up. What is your backup plan?

Note: Robust responses are required to fulfill the Case Study requirements. Use the numbered points provided as headings.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Explore possible career trajectories for the DNP-prepared nurse and the contributions to healthcare to be achieved through those career options. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 707A week 2 Discussion: The Role of the DNP-Prepared Nurse Ensuring Intervention Fidelity

Purpose

This discussion aims to explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse ensuring intervention fidelity for DNP practice change project success. The intervention implementation is the focus, and the DNP student is checking the process to ensure the intervention is implemented exactly as planned to provide maximum impact on the project outcome. Variations in intervention compliance can negatively affect the outcomes and project.

Instructions

All students respond to Part 1 and Part 2 every week. Use the numbered questions as headers in your response. Students who are implementing respond to Part 1 and Part 2— Implementing. Students who are conducting a case study respond to Part 1â€¯and Part 2—Case Study.

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:

Create a brief definition for intervention fidelity that you will provide for stakeholders.

Explain intervention fidelity in the context of your practice change project and your evidence-based intervention specifically.

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State what week number you are currently in for your intervention implementation.

Elaborate in detail about your formative evaluation plan to check the intervention fidelity.

Include details such as the method and frequency for formative evaluation and the person responsible.

Describe the type of feedback you will provide to support keeping the intervention fidelity high.

Add the frequency of stakeholder communication (e.g., staff, organizational leadership, other department managers, or units) about intervention fidelity.

Include an example(s) of your practice change project implementation successes, challenges, barriers, or any concerns.

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format and include the week # for your implementation.

Design best practices for implementing evidence-based practice guidelines. Provide citations and matching references sufficient to support your discussion.

Devise strategies for overcoming barriers in implementing evidence-based practice. Provide citations and references to support strategies.

Detail your formative evaluation plan to check intervention fidelity. Elaborate on the person responsible, the frequency, the documentation, and person responsible to report the results to stakeholders. Add the frequency of stakeholder communication about intervention fidelity.

In Week 2, your formative evaluation plan reveals that a few staff did not implement the evidence-based intervention as intended. What is your next step?

In your Case Study, some staff state, “I am too busy” or “I do not see a need for change since the ‘way we have always done it’ works fine.” Create your detailed response with how you will address this.

You identify that a group of stakeholders were not included in the practice change project planning meetings and are now resisting change. Devise a plan for how you will work with these stakeholders to turn their resistance into support and describe this plan in detail.

Thinking about a live implementation, appraise your estimated resources and your practice change project budget. Explain in detail your appraisal of the estimated resources and include additional resources that may be necessary for a successful implementation.

Note: Robust responses are required to fulfill the Case Study requirements. Use the numbered points provided as headings.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8

NR 707A Week 3 Discussion: The Role DNP-Prepared Nurse Leading Scholarship

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse leading scholarship through various activities. The purpose of nursing scholarship is to disseminate knowledge and spur knowledge translation in nursing science. Nursing scholarship supports professional identity formation and the practice doctorate’s continuous knowledge development. DNP practice change project dissemination has substantial potential to impact nursing science and healthcare outcomes.

Instructions

All students respond to Part 1 and Part 2 every week. Use the numbered questions as headers in your response. Students who are implementing respond to Part 2—Implementing. Students who are conducting a case study respond to Part 2—Case Study.

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:

Explain the scholarship activities you might engage in for your current position.

Explore how you anticipate integrating scholarship into your current or future career.

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

Analyze the resistance you experienced so far in your practice change project. Elaborate on the nature of the resistance and if the resistance focused on the project or the intervention.

Disclose your plan to address the resistance.

Examine your current intervention status and explain if the intervention and the practice change project are on track or if follow-up work is needed to meet the practice change project plan.

Create a detailed discussion about stakeholder communication to include the stakeholder groups and the type and frequency of communication, and assess the adequacy of that communication at this point in your practice change project.

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

You are receiving pushback and resistance from the frontline staff. You can share briefly what you hear on the front lines from nurses as they are doing their best to cope with the pandemic. Design a plan to lead nurses in coping with these changes and challenges they are experiencing. Explain in detail the creative solutions that can address the barriers and/or optimize the facilitators.

You are continuing to conduct your formative evaluation for intervention fidelity and provide feedback. Build your case study practice change project and explain in detail what you are learning about project implementation. This detailed discussion might include learning about the complexity of a practice change project at your specific practice site environment. Describe the complexity of that environment in detail. Examine your detailed intervention implementation plan. Assess if your plan was detailed enough to support high intervention fidelity. State some additional information that you could have added to your intervention plan to support high intervention fidelity during implementation.

Devise an intervention “reminder” or “practice prompt” you can provide for staff to support intervention fidelity. Explain in detail the reminders or practice prompt and how this addition will support high intervention fidelity.

Examine and explain your data collection plan before intervention implementation. Describe if you were able to collect the data needed and how that was collected. State who collected the data, what data was collected, and how that data relates to your outcome for the practice change project. If the data was not able to be collected, describe the barriers, and what you need to do to ensure that you will have the data to evaluate the success of the practice change project implementation. Examine the data collection process and assess if there is an easier way to document and/or collect the data. In your discussion this week, include the details of the data collection process examination and assessment.

Note: Robust responses are required to fulfill the Case Study requirements. Use the numbered points provided as headings.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Explore possible career trajectories for the DNP-prepared nurse and the contributions to healthcare to be achieved through those career options. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)
Demonstrate knowledge and skills in support for and dissemination of scholarship. (PCs 1, 3, 5; POs 2, 3)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is for students to create a professional poster to disseminate their DNP evidence-based practice change project through a poster presentation at a national conference. This progressive poster assignment begins in NR707 and is completed in NR709.

Instructions

Create your poster using the Professional Poster Template located in the Project & Practicum Forms section of the DNP Resources page. Scroll down to select the right poster for this assignment titled: NR 707_DNP Professional Poster Template 6.24.22.

Insert your content into the text boxes for each section; make sure to remove the instructions on the template. The content should be well-developed, concisely conveyed, and supported by the evidence. Leave space between each section without words, so that there is a space break between sections.

Set up your poster using the following format and guidelines.

Layout & Organization

Visual Presentation

Your poster sections are required to have the exact sections and headers as the NR707 Poster template and in the same order. Use the following template headings

Practice Problem

Practice Question

Methodology

Results

Implications

Conclusions

References

The Results and Conclusion sections should be blank. (Case Study students also leave the Methodology section blank.)

The poster should convey the practice change project concisely and accurately to enhance reader comprehension.

Read the poster from another person’s point of view to ensure that the information you entered describes your practice change project concisely and flows logically.

Include the following in your poster:

Practice Problem

Offer strong evidence-based statements for the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels. If available, include data from the practicum site to support this is a priority problem for the organization.

Include the project aim (main purpose or objective) at the end of this section.

Include in-text citations.

Use bullet points for practice problem data points. Bullet points are not required for project aim.

Use concise and accurate statements.

Practice Question

The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

Remove the name or identifiers of the practicum site from the practice question and other sections of the poster.

Methodology (Part 1 and Part 2 in the Rubric) (Students conducting the case study should leave this blank.)

In this section, students who are implementing at the practicum site are required to state the information in short concise phrases with bullet points. Use the exact subheaders listed on the NR 707 poster template.

State the translational science model or theory/change model.

Provide a short description of the setting.

Provide a short description of the population with the estimated number of participants.

Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Briefly describe the intervention (cite primary source)

Briefly describe the formative evaluation plan.

Briefly describe the summative evaluation plan.

State the main outcome in the PICOT practice question.

Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

State the name of the data collection instrument (cite source) OR data source (e.g., data extraction from chart or EHR, or data from the quality department, etc.).

State the data analysis plan (descriptive statistics or statistical test if consulting with a statistician).

State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.

Results: (LEAVE BLANK)

Conclusion: (LEAVE BLANK)

Implications for Nursing and Healthcare

Briefly state your anticipated implications for changing patient, nursing practice, and organizational outcomes. The anticipated outcomes should be based on the research supporting your intervention. Implications should be explained for each system level below:

Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)

Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

Use a bullet point for each implication.

Do not include the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullet points (cover the concepts)

References: Use of Scientific Evidence

Every reference is required to be associated with an in-text citation.

The poster includes at least three (3) references; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization related to the DNP project in citations and references. Avoid secondary or summary sources.

References must be published in the past 5 years.

References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable)

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Rubric

Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric
Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLayout and Organization

Requirements:

1. The poster has the exact sections and headers in the exact columns as the template provided and in the same order as below:

-Practice Problem

-Practice Question

-Methodology

-Implications

-Results

-Conclusions

-References

2. The Results and Conclusion sections are blank. (Case Study students: Also leave the methodology section blank.)

3. The poster conveys the project concisely and accurately.
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent layout and organization.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient layout and organization.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial layout and organization.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped or poor layout and organization.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation

Requirements:

1. The poster is free of spelling, grammar, spacing, and punctuation errors.

2. The poster title is 60-72 font size; text is centered and capitalized. The title is limited to 12 words or less; all words are fully spelled out (no acronyms or abbreviations.)

3. Name and credentials are 32-36 font size; text is centered.

4. The headings are 32-40 font size.

5. The text in each section is 24-32; and should be consistent across the entire poster (except the Reference section can be smaller).

6. Font type should be Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman and should be consistent across the entire poster.

7. Font size in Reference section can be smaller than the other sections but needs to be legible.

8. There is an empty space between each section.

9. Colors adhere to the template provided.

10. No clip art or pictures are in the poster.

11. Text is not hanging off the poster template.

12. All instructions on the poster template have been removed.
20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial visual poster presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor partial visual poster presentation.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem and Project Aim (Purpose)

Requirements:

1. Provide the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels.

2. Include in-text citation(s).

3. Use bullet points for each entry (except the project aim).

4. Use concise and accurate statements.

5. The project aim is a succinct and complete statement of what the intervention will change- your desired outcome.

30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth and also concise practice problem section. The project aim statement is concise and robust.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion of the practice problem and/or the project aim.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Question

Requirements:

1. The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

2. The name or identifiers of the practicum site are removed from the practice question and other sections of the poster.
20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and includes the practice question from the IRB approval letter.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient practice question from the IRB approval letter.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial practice question.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped practice question.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 1 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.

2. State the translational science model or theory/change model.

3. State a short description of the setting.

4. Provide a short description of the population with an estimate of the number of participants.

5. Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

6. Briefly describe the intervention (with primary citation).
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 2 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.

2. Briefly state the formative evaluation plan.

3. Briefly state the summative evaluation plan.

4. Briefly state the main outcome from the PICOT practice question.

5. Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

6. State the name of the data collection instrument (with primary citation) OR data source.

7. Briefly describe the data analysis plan.

8. State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications

Requirements:

1. Implications should be explained in a brief statement for each system level below.

a. Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

b. Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)

c. Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

2. Use a bullet point for each implication.

3. Avoid including the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullets (cover the concepts)

20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise implications discussion.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient implications discussion.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial implications discussion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped implications discussion.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

Requirements:

1. Every reference has an in-text citation.

2. At least 3 references are included; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization.

3. Summary and secondary sources are avoided.

4. References must be published within the past 5 years.

5. References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).
20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent use of scientific evidence and reference section.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides sufficient use of scientific evidence and reference section.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level ofâ€¯Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial use of scientific evidence and reference section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides undeveloped use of scientific evidence and reference section.

20 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 707A Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

NUR 707A week 4 Discussion: The Role of the DNP-Prepared Nurse Leader

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse leader and the various activities within that role.

Instructions

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:

What is the impact of the DNP-prepared nurse leader on today’s healthcare systems?

How do you anticipate integrating this leadership role in your current or future career?

In your opinion, what is needed for successful professional identity formation for DNP-prepared nurse graduates to achieve healthcare systems leadership positions?

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:
State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

Evaluate your implementation progress and any successes, barriers, or challenges you are experiencing with your practice change project implementation.

Examine your leadership style in your DNP practice change project implementation specifically. What is your leadership style in your practice change project? Explain your assessment of your leadership style and determine if it is congruent with the stakeholder team. Defend your reasons why it is or is not congruent. If not congruent, how might your leadership style need to change?

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format and include the week # for your implementation.

Examine best practices for implementing evidence-based practice guidelines with references sufficient to support best practice.

Propose strategies for overcoming barriers in implementing evidence-based practice with references sufficient to support strategies. Include detailed example(s) of how you will implement each strategy.

Create a detailed discussion about your ongoing implementation progress. Build your discussion about what the implementation looks like at this point in your practice change project. List the details of your meetings with staff and stakeholders. (Include the weekly meeting frequency, who is attending, how many meetings did you host this week, and the topics of discussion.)

Explain the results of your formative evaluations. How are you addressing challenges and providing feedback if the fidelity is lower than expected? If the fidelity is high, describe how you are encouraging participants.

Describe in detail what you are learning about practice change project implementation that may be different than your original expectations.

Examine your leadership style. What is your leadership style? Assess if your leadership style works in this case study practice change project? Explain your assessment of your leadership style and determine if it is congruent with the stakeholder team. Defend your reasons why it is or is not congruent. If not congruent, how might your leadership style need to change?

Given the current challenges, assess the benefits and risks of your leadership style and how this can affect the practice change project implementation.

Note: Robust responses are required to fulfill the Case Study requirements. Use the numbered points provided as headings.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Explore possible career trajectories for the DNP-prepared nurse and the contributions to healthcare to be achieved through those career options. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 707A Week 5 Discussion: The Role of the DNP-Prepared Nurse Educator

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse educator and activities in various career paths.

Instructions

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:
How do you anticipate integrating nurse educator activities into your current or future career?

Briefly examine the activities that interest you the most for the academic nurse educator, the healthcare organization clinical nurse educator, or the DNP-prepared nurse leader as a mentor. Explain why these activities appeal to you.

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

Was there a need for a mid-course correction or a supportive strategy such as reminder index cards or huddles to support intervention fidelity? If so, please explain the strategy in detail.

How frequently are you engaging in communication with the stakeholders and the participants of your practice change project?

To successfully complete your practice change project, briefly examine your practice change project budget and defend your conclusions if you need more resources, untapped resources, or if your budget is adequate.

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format and include the week # for your implementation.

You are continuing to conduct your formative evaluation for intervention fidelity and provide feedback. What are you learning about practice change project implementation?

How is the pandemic affecting the implementation of the practice change project?

Create alternate approaches that could be implemented to facilitate the success of your practice change project implementation and evaluation phases.

Identify a minor course correction that may be needed to support intervention fidelity. Explain how this minor correction might cause a minor modification or adjustment in your practice change project plan. (Keep in mind that after IRB approval only minor project plan adjustments are made)

Describe the type of communications and with whom is needed for practice change project success. Speculate how stakeholder communication might change as the practice change project moves forward. Explicate how you are engaging the stakeholders and the participants of your project at this point in the implementation.

Describe additional support you might need from nursing, organizational leadership, course faculty, and/or your preceptor to successfully implement the evidence-based intervention. Elaborate on the details of what that support looks like to you.

Note: Robust responses are required to fulfill the Case Study requirements. Use the numbered points provided as headings.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Explore possible career trajectories for the DNP-prepared nurse and the contributions to healthcare to be achieved through those career options. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 707A Week 7 Discussion: Dissemination Through Conference Poster Presentation

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to examine the process of dissemination of the Doctor of Nursing Practice Scholarly work through a conference poster presentation.

Instructions

Part 1: All Students

Reflect upon your readings and professional experience and address the following in 150 words or less:

Search for and identify a national nursing conference that you would like to attend and present your poster. The following link provides many options:

Link (website): Upcoming Nursing Events and ConferencesLinks to an external site.

Confirm that your DNP practice change project topic is compatible with the conference theme and conference presenter requirements.

State the name and date of the conference in the discussion.

Find the “Call for Abstracts” on the conference website.

Part 2: Students Implementing at the Practicum Site

For this week’s implementation update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format.

State the week # for your intervention implementation.

Evaluate your implementation progress and the successes or challenges you are experiencing.

Identify the total number of participants.

Reflecting on your implementation so far, is there anything you might change if you were offering advice to someone else implementing this same project?

Part 2: Students Completing the Case Study

For this week’s case study update, address the following:

State your practice question in PICOT format and include the week # for your implementation.

Examine best practices for implementing evidence-based practice guidelines with references sufficient to support best practice.

Propose strategies for overcoming barriers in implementing evidence-based practice with references sufficient to support strategies. Analyze your formative evaluations. How are you addressing challenges and providing feedback?

You find that the stakeholders need additional education at this point. How would you provide this education?

What have you learned about your project and the implementation process during this 8-week course? Describe what you are learning. Are you learning what you expected, or is your experience different than anticipated?