NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population

NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population

NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AMONG THE FEMALE POPULATION

An individual’s health is influenced by many factors. Nurse Practitioners must be versed in all factors and adept in assessing the impact of economic conditions, education, environment, and social conditions on health.

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) have a major impact on people’s health, well-being, and quality of life.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Examples of SDOH include:

Safe housing, transportation, and neighborhoods

Racism, discrimination, and violence

Education, job opportunities, and income

Access to nutritious foods and physical activity opportunities

Polluted air and water

Language and literacy skills

For this Discussion, you will explore Social Determinants of Health and five areas that are impacted. For your community where you reside, assess these five areas. You will also explore available instruments to complete a full assessment of an individual’s SDOH.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

Who is most affected?

What major challenges have you found?

What changes could you propose?

What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use when assessing your community?

Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the community age groups.

BY DAY 3

Post a brief summary of the findings of the Social Determinants of Health in your community for each of the five areas described above. When providing your summary, take into consideration the preparation questions above and incorporate those into the summary.

References should be used to support your findings.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

BY DAY 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts on two different days and provide additional insight to your colleagues related to issues and topics they may want to also consider. Use the Learning Resources and/or the best available evidence from current literature to support your explanation.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

NRNP_6552_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:

Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 to >39.16 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)… Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources… No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

39.16 to >34.76 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)… Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 credible references.

34.76 to >30.36 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)… One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed… Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

30.36 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)… Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria… Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Contains only 1 or no credible references.

44 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:

Writing

6 to >5.34 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Written clearly and concisely… Contains no grammatical or spelling errors… Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5.34 to >4.74 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Written concisely… May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors… Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4.74 to >4.14 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Written somewhat concisely… May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Contains some APA formatting errors.

4.14 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Not written clearly or concisely… Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:

Timely and full participation
10 to >8.9 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts main discussion by due date.

8.9 to >7.9 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Posts main discussion by due date… Meets requirements for full participation.

7.9 to >6.9 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Posts main discussion by due date.

6.9 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post main discussion by due date.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 to >8.01 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8.01 to >7.11 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7.11 to >6.21 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6.21 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:

Writing
6 to >5.34 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed… Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5.34 to >4.74 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed… Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4.74 to >4.14 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

4.14 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:

Timely and full participation
5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date.
5 pts

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population HERE

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.01 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8.01 to >7.11 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7.11 to >6.21 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6.21 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:

Writing

6 to >5.34 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed… Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5.34 to >4.74 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed… Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4.74 to >4.14 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

4.14 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.
6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:

Timely and full participation
5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date.
5 pts

Total Points: 100