NRNP 6568 Course Assignments (Week 3 & 9)

NRNP 6568 Course Assignments (Week 3 & 9)

NRNP 6568 Course Assignments (Week 3 & 9)

NRNP 6568 Week 3 Assignment 1: STUDY PLAN

Based on your practice exam question results, identify strengths and areas of opportunity and create a tailored study plan to use throughout this course to help you prepare for the national certification exam. This will serve as an action plan to help you track your goals, tasks, and progress.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6568 Course Assignments (Week 3 & 9) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

Leik, M. T. C. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Ch. 5, Head Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Review

Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Appendix 4-A “Ear, Nose, Mouth, and Throat Examination” (pp. 191–192)

Note: The textbook listed below is from NRNP 6531. Review the chapters assigned in this textbook as needed to refresh your knowledge.

Buttaro, T. M., Polgar-Bailey, P., Sandberg-Cook, J., & Trybulski, J. (2021). Primary care: Interprofessional collaborative practice (6th ed.). Elsevier.

Note: Review the following chapters, as needed.

Ch. 52, Evaluation of the Eyes

Ch. 53, Cataracts

Ch. 54, Blepharitis, Hordeolum, and Chalazion

Ch. 55, Conjunctivitis

Ch. 56, Corneal Surface Defects and Ocular Surface Foreign Bodies

Ch. 57, Dry Eye Syndrome

Ch. 58, Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Dacryocystitis

Ch. 59, Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis

Ch. 60, Pingueculae and Pterygia

Ch. 61, Traumatic Ocular Disorders

Ch. 62, Auricular Disorders

Ch. 63, Cerumen Impaction

Ch. 64, Cholesteatoma

Ch. 65, Impaired Hearing

Ch. 66, Inner Ear Disturbances

Ch. 67, Otitis Externa

Ch. 68, Otitis Media

Ch. 69, Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Ch. 70, Chronic Nasal Congestion and Discharge

Ch. 71, Epistaxis

Ch. 72, Nasal Trauma

Ch. 73, Rhinitis

Ch. 74, Sinusitis

Ch. 75, Smell and Taste Disturbances

Ch. 76, Tumors and Polyps of the Nose

Ch. 77, Dental Abscess

Ch. 78, Diseases of the Salivary Gland

Ch. 79, Epiglottitis

Ch. 80, Oral Infections

Ch. 81, Peritonsillar Abscess

Ch. 82, Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis

Document: Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)Download Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)

Required Media

HEENT Review

In this video, Dr. Jodi Duncan reviews important considerations when assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with HEENT conditions. (18 min)

Develop Good Habits. (2023, May 15). 15 SMART Goals Examples for StudentsLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVBOjp2uxZE

Optional Resources

Adult HEENT

Dr. Stefanie Gatica discusses how to listen to the patient and what to look for as you assess your patient. (25m)

To Prepare:

Reflect on your practice exam results. Identify content-area strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Also reflect on your overall test-taking. Was the length of time allotted comfortable or did you run out of time? Did a particular question format prove difficult?

The Assignment:

Summarize your practice exam results, including your strengths and opportunities for improvement. Note: Your grade for this Assignment will not be derived from your test results but from your self-reflection and study plan.

Create a study plan, including 3–4 specific goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal.

Each goal must be developed using SMART goal format (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Based). See weekly resources to help with developing these goals.

Include a timetable on a calendar template for accomplishing the goals and tasks and add a description of how you will measure your progress.

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.

BY DAY 7

Submit your study plan with calendar.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete the practice exam from your certification exam review text. Based on your results and considering the National Certification Exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

20 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

A summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement is incomplete or missing.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a study plan, including specific goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Goals must be in SMART goal format. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides 3–4 clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides 3–4 appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured is provided.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides 3–4 vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.

24 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured is incomplete or missing.
35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, and print or online resources you could use to study.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

NRNP 6568 Week 3 Assignment 2: ASSESSING, DIAGNOSING, AND TREATING PATIENTS WITH HEENT CONDITIONS

Most everyone has at some point experienced minor HEENT conditions, such as a head cold or seasonal allergies, and symptoms, such as a runny nose, watery eyes, or a sore throat. While they are relatively minor and short-lived, they nevertheless impair many of the simple pleasures so many enjoy.

HEENT symptoms can represent a wide variety of issues, some of which suggest problems that extend well beyond their temporary impact on life’s simple pleasures. HEENT conditions can result in dangerous respiratory impairment or be symptoms of life-threatening conditions or disease.

For this Assignment, your instructor will assign a case study, which will give you the opportunity to practice assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with HEENT conditions.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

Leik, M. T. C. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Ch. 5, Head Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Review

Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Appendix 4-A “Ear, Nose, Mouth, and Throat Examination” (pp. 191–192)

Note: The textbook listed below is from NRNP 6531. Review the chapters assigned in this textbook as needed to refresh your knowledge.

Buttaro, T. M., Polgar-Bailey, P., Sandberg-Cook, J., & Trybulski, J. (2021). Primary care: Interprofessional collaborative practice (6th ed.). Elsevier.

Note: Review the following chapters, as needed.

Ch. 52, Evaluation of the Eyes

Ch. 53, Cataracts

Ch. 54, Blepharitis, Hordeolum, and Chalazion

Ch. 55, Conjunctivitis

Ch. 56, Corneal Surface Defects and Ocular Surface Foreign Bodies

Ch. 57, Dry Eye Syndrome

Ch. 58, Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Dacryocystitis

Ch. 59, Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis

Ch. 60, Pingueculae and Pterygia

Ch. 61, Traumatic Ocular Disorders

Ch. 62, Auricular Disorders

Ch. 63, Cerumen Impaction

Ch. 64, Cholesteatoma

Ch. 65, Impaired Hearing

Ch. 66, Inner Ear Disturbances

Ch. 67, Otitis Externa

Ch. 68, Otitis Media

Ch. 69, Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Ch. 70, Chronic Nasal Congestion and Discharge

Ch. 71, Epistaxis

Ch. 72, Nasal Trauma

Ch. 73, Rhinitis

Ch. 74, Sinusitis

Ch. 75, Smell and Taste Disturbances

Ch. 76, Tumors and Polyps of the Nose

Ch. 77, Dental Abscess

Ch. 78, Diseases of the Salivary Gland

Ch. 79, Epiglottitis

Ch. 80, Oral Infections

Ch. 81, Peritonsillar Abscess

Ch. 82, Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis

Document: Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)Download Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)

Required Media

HEENT Review

In this video, Dr. Jodi Duncan reviews important considerations when assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with HEENT conditions. (18 min)

Develop Good Habits. (2023, May 15). 15 SMART Goals Examples for StudentsLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVBOjp2uxZE

Optional Resources

Adult HEENT

Dr. Stefanie Gatica discusses how to listen to the patient and what to look for as you assess your patient. (25m)

To Prepare:

Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients with conditions of the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat.

Review the case study provided by your Instructor. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate in order to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

Identify three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with HEENT conditions.

The Assignment

Use the Focused SOAP Note Template to address the following:

Subjective: What details are provided regarding the patient’s personal and medical history?

Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Include pertinent positive and negative physical exam findings. Describe whether the patient presented with any morbidities or psychosocial issues.

Assessment: Explain your differential diagnoses, providing a minimum of three. List them from highest priority to lowest priority and include their CPT and ICD-10 codes for the diagnosis. What would your primary diagnosis be and why?

Plan: Explain your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis. What would your plan be for treatment and management? Include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

Reflection notes: Describe your “aha!” moments from analyzing this case.

BY DAY 7

Submit your focused SOAP note.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review

Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate documentation in the Focused SOAP Note Template about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned. In the Subjective section, provide: • Chief complaint • History of present illness (HPI) • Current medications • Allergies • Patient medical history (PMHx) • Review of systems
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, current medications, allergies, medical history, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, current medications, allergies, medical history, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, current medications, allergies, medical history, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but it is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies.

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, current medications, allergies, medical history, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or, subjective documentation is missing.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn the Objective section, provide: • Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history • Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies.

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn the Assessment section, provide: • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. Explain what rules each differential in or out and justify your primary diagnosis selection. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response lists in order of priority at least three distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the conditions selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response lists in order of priority at least three different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the conditions selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response lists three possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response lists two or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn the Plan section, provide: • A detailed treatment plan for the patient that addresses each diagnosis, as applicable. Includes documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other healthcare providers, therapeutic interventions, education, disposition of the patient, and any planned follow up visits. • A discussion related to health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors, PMH, and other risk factors. • Reflections on the case describing insights or lessons learned.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response thoroughly and accurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient that addresses each diagnosis and includes diagnostic studies neeed, referrals, therapeutic interventions, patient education and disposition, and planned follow-up visits. A thorough and accurate discussion of health promotion and disease prevention related to the case is provided. Reflections on the case demonstrate strong critical thinking and synthesis of ideas.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient that addresses each diagnosis and includes diagnostic studies neeed, referrals, therapeutic interventions, patient education and disposition, and planned follow-up visits. An accurate discussion of health promotion and disease prevention related to the case is provided. Reflections on the case demonstrate critical thinking.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient. The discussion on health promotion and disease prevention related to the case is somewhat vague or contains innaccuracies. Reflections on the case demonstrate adequate understanding of course topics.

20 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response does not address all diagnoses or is missing elements of the treatment plan. The discussion on health promotion and disease prevention related to the case is vague, innaccurate, or missing. Reflections on the case are vague or missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old) and support the treatment plan in following current standards of care.
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the treatment plan for the patient in the assigned case study. Each resource represents the latest in standards of care and provides strong justification for treatment decisions.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the treatment plan for the patient in the assigned case study. Each resource represents current standards of care and supports treatment decisions.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Three evidence-based resources are provided to support treatment decisions, but may not represent the latest in standards of care or may only provide vague or weak justification for the treatment plan.

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Two or fewer resources are provided to support treatment decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based or do not support the treatment plan.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6568 Course Assignments (Week 3 & 9) HERE

NRNP 6568 Week 9 Assignment 1: Nurse Practitioner Professional Career Planner

As you approach the end of your Master of Science in Nursing program and prepare for a career as a nurse practitioner, you will want to create a cover letter, resume, and portfolio that best represent your knowledge, skills, and abilities as a professional in the field of nursing. For this Assignment, you will create a Career Planner that you can use as you pursue your next professional role.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

earning Resources

Required Readings

Leik, M. T. C. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Ch. 28, Cultural and Spiritual Health Beliefs

Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Chapter 10, “The Employed Nurse Practitioner”

Document: Career Planner Guide (Word document)

Download Career Planner Guide (Word document)

To Prepare:

Review the Career Planner Guide.

Seek out resources on cover letters, resumes, and other professional resources, as needed. The Walden University Career Planning and Development site has information on many topics of relevance.

Develop a cover letter, resume, philosophy statement, and other professional resources that meet the requirements outlined in the Career Planner Guide.

By Day 7

Submit Cover Letter, Resume, Personal Philosophy Statement and Long/Short term goals.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week9_Assignment1_Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week9_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Your cover letter should be: • Presented and formatted in professional business manner • Addressed properly • Clear and concise (no more than one page) and include an introduction, body, and conclusion • Written in a professional tone

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes a well-written and compelling introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes an appropriate introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone.

16 to >14.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Presentation and formatting are somewhat uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is addressed adequately but may be missing one or more components. Response contains an introduction, body, and conclusion but may be somewhat vague or unclear. May not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not uniformly professional.

14 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Presentation and formatting are uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is not addressed appropriately. Response may be missing an introduction, body, and/or conclusion. Does not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not appropriate or response is missing.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Your Resume should be clear, concise and well organized and it should also include your: • Name, location (city/town and state), business phone number, and email address (centered at top of resume) • Objective: 2–3 sentences describing your goal/objective for employment • Certifications & licenses • Education • Professional experience • Honors/Awards • References

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear and well-written objective for employment. Response clearly, accurately, and concisely describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear objective for employment. Response clearly and accurately describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Response may contain minor errors in presentation and formatting. Response is addressed but may be missing a component. Response contains an objective for employment. Response describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards, as applicable, but may be somewhat unclear or disorganized. Response provides two references.

28 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Response contains errors in presentation and formatting. Response is not addressed. Response does not contain an objective for employment. Response is missing two or more of the following components: certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides one or no references.
40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Your Portfolio should be clear, concise and well organized and it should also include your: • Personal philosophy statement • Personal goals (short term and long term) • Self-assessment • Achievements • Letters of recommendation • References (list names, affiliation and contact information) • Certifications and licenses • Prior degrees • Transcripts (Note: An unofficial transcript will meet this requirement.) • Certificates of attendance for continuing education • Publications • Research • Oral presentations and/or poster presentations

75 to >67.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response contains a well-articulated philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear and well-written personal goals and self-assessment. Response contains a clear, concise, and accurate description of achievements, publications, research, and presentations. Response contains all of the following components: two letters of recommendation, three professional references, certifications and licenses, prior degrees, transcripts, and certificates of attendance for continuing education (as applicable).

67 to >59.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response contains a clear philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear personal goals and self-assessment. Response contains an accurate description of achievements, publications, research, and presentations. Response contains all of the following components: two letters of recommendation, three professional references, certifications and licenses, prior degrees, transcripts, and certificates of attendance for continuing education (as applicable).

59 to >52.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or is somewhat inappropriate for business. Response contains a somewhat general philosophy statement. Personal goals and self-assessment are somewhat vague or unclear. Description of achievements, publications, research, and presentations are somewhat vague or unclear.

52 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or are inappropriate for business. Several or all components are vague, inaccurate, or missing.

75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 150

NRNP 6568 Week 9 Assignment 2: Negotiating the Nurse Practitioner Employment Contract

If you could work at the practice of your dreams, what would that look like? How would you negotiate that dream job contract?

Graduating from nurse practitioner school is an exciting time of accomplishment. However, it’s also time to turn dreams into reality and begin your search for the perfect job. Being passionate about the specialty you would like to go into, and the impact you would like to have on your community and profession are all important aspects of landing a job. After all, attitude can be everything to a future employer, but there are some things to consider before your job search and interview: The type of practice that would work best for you (and your family), and the position contract you will negotiate.

For this assignment, you will develop a PowerPoint Presentation (8-10 slides) answering the questions listed in Parts 1 and 2 of the assignment. The presentation is to be recorded in your own words, as if you were presenting it to your instructor.

You are to follow the 10/20/30 rule for presentations: no more than 10 slides, presentation not longer than 20 minutes, and text is not lower than 30-point font.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Leik, M. T. C. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Ch. 28, Cultural and Spiritual Health Beliefs

Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Chapter 10, “The Employed Nurse Practitioner”

Document: Career Planner Guide (Word document)

Download Career Planner Guide (Word document)

To Prepare:

Review the weekly resources.

Seek out professional resources on contract negotiations.

Review the FNP scope of practice for your state.

Seek out local NP organizations to assess which organizations would best fit your needs.

By Day 7

Submit the recorded PowerPoint presentation. (This assignment does not need to be submitted through Turnitin) but you must have a reference slide to support your thoughts and ideas.

For Part 1 of this assignment:

Discuss the type of practice and setting you would like to work out of (specialty, family, geriatrics, hospital, nursing home, hospice, urgent care, etc.). What makes for an ideal work environment? What type of support system and staff do you need? What services do you see yourself providing? What services are you NOT willing to or are not comfortable providing?

How will you meet your CME requirements while practicing at this setting? How will you keep track of your CME hours?

What nursing organization(s) interest you in joining, and how will joining an organization benefit you at your position?

Once you have met the requirements for autonomy in your state while working at your current position, and for those of you who practice in a lifetime of collaboration state, assume you will one day have autonomy. How will you maintain your collaborative relationships with other nurse practitioners you have worked with, the practitioners you have referred to, as well as your collaborative physician?

Part 2 of the assignment:

You’ve just been offered a position at the perfect job you discussed in Part 1 of the assignment.

Besides focusing on patients, reaching a fair and equitable contract that includes not only your salary and benefits but expectations of your patient load, the amount of time you will be spending at the clinic or a health care setting, and the services you will be providing, will affect how you feel about your job over time. It’s time now to consider the position’s job offer.

Part 2:

What questions should you ask your potential future employer about the offer?

What salary and bonus structure are acceptable to you?

How can you figure out your net worth for the practice?

If you are expected to take call, what percentage of your salary is reasonable toward this activity?

List the benefits you should negotiate into your contract.

Discuss the practice expectations with your employer. How can you be sure that you are being asked to practice within the scope of your practice?

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Develop an 8-10 slide narrated PowerPoint presentation discussing questions listed in Part 1 and Part 2 of the assignment. Part 1: Briefly discuss type of practice setting, ideal work environment, support system, services provided, CME requirements, nursing organizations, state requirements, and collaborative agreements.
50 to >45.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. All questions listed in Part 1 are addressed. Response uses a professional tone.

45 to >40.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. A maximum of one – two questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Response uses a professional tone.

40 to >35.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Presentation is formatted in a somewhat clear and professional business manner. A maximum of three – four questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional.

35 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Presentation is not formatted correctly and has errors in professional business manner. More than four questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Briefly discuss employment offer, salary and bonus structure, contract negotiation, benefits, and practice expectations.

50 to >45.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. All questions listed in Part 2 are addressed. Response uses a professional tone.

45 to >40.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. A maximum of one – two questions listed in Part 2 are missing. Response uses a professional tone.

40 to >35.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Presentation is formatted in a somewhat clear and professional business manner. A maximum of three – four questions listed in Part 2 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional.

35 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Presentation is not formatted correctly and has errors in professional business manner. More than four questions listed in Part 2 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Design: Slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, consistent and appropriate to the topic. Text is clear and easy for the audience to see. 8 – 10 slides are presented Text is no lower than 30 points in size.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

PPT slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, consistent and appropriate to the topic. Text is clear and easy for the audience to see. 8- 10 slides are presented Text is no lower than 30 points in size.

22 to >20.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

PPT slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, consistent and appropriate to the topic. Text is clear and easy for the audience to see. Less than 8 or more than 10 slides are presented. Text is no lower than 30 points in size.

20 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

PPT slides display some elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are not consistent and appropriate to the topic on all slides. Text is unclear and not easy for the audience to see. Less than 8 or more than 10 slides are presented. Text varies in size from slide to slide.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

PPT slides and formatting detracts from the content and/or are inappropriate for business. Several or all components are vague, inaccurate, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Narrated Presentation: Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from slides. It is evident that the presentation was rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly enough to be heard by the audience. Presenter showed enthusiasm for the subject matter and encouraged audience interest.
20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from slides. It is evident that the presentation was rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly enough to be heard by the audience. Presenter showed enthusiasm for the subject matter and encouraged audience interest.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from slides. The presentation does not appear to have been rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly enough to be heard by the audience. Presenter does not show enthusiasm for the subject matter and does not encourage audience interest.

16 to >14.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Presenter was somewhat familiar with the material and read off the slides. The presentation does not appear to have been rehearsed. Presenter spoke unclear and was too fast to be heard by the audience. Presenter does not show enthusiasm for the subject matter and does not encourage audience interest.

14 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The was no narrated presentation accompanied with the slides.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for PPT presentations. Reference list slide included.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts

Total Points: 150