NRS 394 Week 7 Discussion: Presentation of Course Project: Part 3 (Graded)
NRS 394 Week 7 Discussion: Presentation of Course Project: Part 3 (Graded)
**Please Note: This Discussion is linked to your Week 6: Course Project Part 3 Assignment**
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to present the information from Course Project Part 3. This discussion provides an opportunity for you to understand your classmates’ viewpoints that may differ from your own and will enhance learning.
[elementor-template id="144964"]Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 3: Describe culturally competent nursing care across the lifespan. (PO 4)
Due Date
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
Posts in the discussion on two different days
Total Points Possible: 100 points
Project Overview
There are three parts to the project.
There will be graded Project Check-ins that correlate to each part.
The topic selected in Part 1 will be the same one used in parts 2 and 3.
Review the table below for overview and due dates with each topic.
Carefully review the instructions, templates, and rubrics for each of the three parts as you begin this Course Project.
Contact your instructor with questions.
Overview Points Due Date
Part 1 completed Week 3
Part 2 completed Week 4
Part 3 completed Week 6
Discussion of Topics 100
Two posts (answer post and reply post) on two different days by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Preparing the Discussion
Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate outside scholarly sources when required
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.
Best Practices include:
Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.
Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.
Select different classmates for your reply each week.
Discussion
This discussion prompts you to identify and discuss cultural competence in professional nursing. You must present your Week 6: Course Project Part 3 Poster to your classmates. Please submit the poster as an attachment so your classmates can review this information. Please address the following in the discussion box:
Cultural population selected and why
Health issue selected and why
Highlight three or more key points from your poster
Scholarly outside sources are included and credited on your poster.
Grading
To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.
RNBSN_100_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
RNBSN_100_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer Post
•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and
•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
32 pts
100% Excellent
Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
28 pts
88% Good
Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
26 pts
80% Fair
Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
12 pts
38% Poor
Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
0 pts
0% Missing
Does not answer the discussion question(s).
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources
•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,
•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,
•All sources are credited within the body of the post,
•Evidence supports the discussion, and
•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
24 pts
100% Excellent
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
21 pts
88% Good
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
19 pts
80% Fair
Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
9 pts
38% Poor
Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.
0 pts
0% Missing
Does not integrate any evidence.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply Post
•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and
•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
28 pts
100% Excellent
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
25 pts
88% Good
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.
22 pts
80% Fair
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.
11 pts
38% Poor
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.
0 pts
0% Missing
No reply post to classmates or instructor.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicates Professionally
All posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil, and caring, and
•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
16 pts
100% Excellent
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
14 pts
88% Good
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
13 pts
80% Fair
All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
6 pts
38% Poor
All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
0 pts
0% Missing
All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
No Points Deducted
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
Points Deducted (-10 Points)
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
Total Points: 100
[elementor-template id="144964"]