NRS 415 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)
NRS 415 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)
NRS 415 Topic 1 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 1 DQ 1
Assessment Description
The Topic 1 Resource, “The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education,” represents the core competencies of professional nursing education and provides a framework that nursing programs use to prepare professional nurses. The RN-BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using both direct and indirect care experiences for practicing nurses. In your practicum course, you will complete these hours with a preceptor and work to develop a change project.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 415 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Which of the 10 domains in the “The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education” are you interested in learning more about and why? Based on the readings in the Class and Topic 1 Resources, what are some characteristics of successful students and what strategies can you implement to be a successful student? Identify a role model or mentor who would be able to support your professional growth.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 10.2.
Topic 1 DQ 2
Assessment Description
How has nursing practice evolved over time? Explain the significance of evidence-based practice and critical thinking in modern nursing. Identify one key nursing leader and summarize one historical event that has shaped contemporary nursing practice, the advancement of nursing as a profession, and the development of nursing roles. Select a leader and a historical event different from those identified by your classmates.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.1, 9.5.
NRS 415 Topic 1 Assignment: Benchmark – Applying Leadership and Management Principles –
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the various approaches nursing leaders employ when addressing issues in practice.
Select an issue from the following list: workplace violence, workplace injury, unit restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, or use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses).
In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, discuss the following:
Describe the issue you selected. Provide data to support how this issue impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs.
Using research evidence for support, present one possible solution that could be implemented to address the issue. In your discussion, be sure to include financial considerations as they relate to implementation of the solution.
Describe a leadership style that would best address the issue.
Discuss how this leadership style compares to your personal leadership style.
Compare two different leadership theories that could be applied to resolution of the issue. Explain how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue.
Discuss the nurse’s role within an interdisciplinary team in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address this issue.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN-BSN
10.3: Develop capacity for leadership.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.1, 2.5, 2.9, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 7.2, 10.3.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Applying Leadership and Management Principles – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total200 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Selected Issue in Nursing Practice
Describe the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs.
0 points
A description of the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs is not present.
12 points
A description of the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs is incomplete or incorrect.
12.64 points
A description of the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs is present but lacks detail.
14.24 points
A description of the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs is detailed.
16 points
A description of the selected issue and how it impacts the quality of care in the setting in which it occurs is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
Solution to Implement to Address Issue in Nursing Practice
Solution presented includes researched evidence for support and financial considerations.
0 points
A description of a solution to implement to address the issue in nursing practice, including researched evidence and financial considerations, is not present.
18 points
A description of a solution to implement to address the issue in nursing practice, including researched evidence and financial considerations, is incomplete or incorrect.
18.96 points
A description of a solution to implement to address the issue in nursing practice, including researched evidence and financial considerations, is present but lacks detail.
21.36 points
A description of a solution to implement to address the issue in nursing practice, including researched evidence and financial considerations, is detailed.
24 points
A description of a solution to implement to address the issue in nursing practice, including researched evidence and financial considerations, is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
Leadership Style to Address Issue and Comparison to Personal Leadership Style (B)
Describe a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and compare to personal leadership style. (C10.3)
0 points
A description of a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and comparison to student’s personal leadership style is not present.
27 points
A description of a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and comparison to student’s personal leadership style is incomplete or incorrect.
28.44 points
A description of a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and comparison to student’s personal leadership style is present but lacks detail.
32.04 points
A description of a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and comparison to student’s personal leadership style is detailed.
36 points
A description of a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue and comparison to student’s personal leadership style is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
Leadership Theories to Address Issue
Compare two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective.
0 points
A discussion of two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue is not present.
27 points
A discussion of two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue is incomplete or incorrect.
28.44 points
A discussion of two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue is present but lacks detail.
32.04 points
A discussion of two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue is detailed and provides examples.
36 points
A discussion of two leadership theories that could be applied to resolve the issue and how each theory would be effective in addressing the issue is thorough and provides substantial supporting detail and examples.
Nurse’s Role Within Interdisciplinary Teams
Discuss the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism.
0 points
A discussion of the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address the issue is not present.
21 points
A discussion of the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address the issue is incomplete or incorrect.
22.12 points
A discussion of the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address the issue is present but lacks detail.
24.92 points
A discussion of the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address the issue is detailed.
28 points
A discussion of the nurse’s role within interdisciplinary teams in promoting patient quality and safety while fostering professionalism to address the issue is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
10.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
11.06 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
12.46 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
14 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
10.5 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
11.06 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
12.46 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
14 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
9 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
9.48 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
10.68 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
12 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
9 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
9.48 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
10.68 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
12 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
6 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
6.32 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
7.12 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
8 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 415 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 2 DQ 1
Assessment Description
The scope and standards of practice guide the nursing profession in competence and performance expectations. The scope of practice for nursing defines the activities that a person licensed as a nurse is permitted to perform while the standards of practice delineate performance expectations for all registered nurses. Review Chapter 3, “The Nursing Workforce,” of The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity, located in the Topic 2 Resources, and compare the scope of practice and differentiated practice competencies of licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Review “Scope of Nursing Practice” from Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice, located in the Topic 2 Resources. Standard 12 of the standards of practice describes the nurse’s role related to education. Explain the role of professional development (life-long learning) in the context of this standard.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 2 DQ 2
ssessment Description
Read the scenario and address the discussion question:
Scenario
Nurse Lope is starting a busy shift in which she was finishing report on Mr. Johnson. During report, Nurse Jim who was finishing his shift also gave Nurse Lope a medicine cup containing three of Mr. Johnson’s unopened medications that he reported were recently retrieved from the medication dispenser. Nurse Lope was told that these were supposed to have been given 30 minutes ago and asked if she could give them during bedside hand-off. As Nurse Lope planned to stay in Mr. Johnson’s room to complete his vital signs and assessment, she agreed with this plan.
When she opened Mr. Johnson’s electronic medical record to administer these medications, she noticed that these medications were scheduled to be given 3 hours ago. Additionally, one of the medications had a barcode that was not scanning to Mr. Johnson’s chart. Nurse Lope proceeded to administer these medications so that she would not be late on the next round of medications, which included some of the same ones. It was later discovered that the medication that was not scanning was for another patient and should not have been given to Mr. Johnson.
Discussion Question
Outline the concept of professional accountability as it pertains to nursing. Examine the actions of Nurse Jim and Nurse Lope. Discuss how you would approach this scenario if you were in Jim’s and Lope’s position. Based on your analysis of how nurses demonstrate accountability in clinical practice, the nursing process, and evidence-based practice, explain how you would handle this situation if you were the nurse manager overseeing Jim and Lope.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.2, 2.5, 2.6, 9.4.
NRS 415 Topic 2 Assignment: Professional Accountability Reflection
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.
For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.
In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:
Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.
Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?
Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?
Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?
Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Professional Accountability Reflection – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total110 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Post Engagement
Describe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.
0 points
A description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is not present.
20.63 points
A description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is incomplete or incorrect.
21.73 points
A description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is present but lacks detail.
24.48 points
A description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is detailed.
27.5 points
A description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is thorough.
Standard of Conduct
Discuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional.
0 points
A discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional, is not present.
24.75 points
A discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.
26.07 points
A discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.
29.37 points
A discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.
33 points
A discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail and examples.
Christian Values and Social Media
Discuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that could be improved.
0 points
A discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could be improved is not present.
12.38 points
A discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could be improved is incomplete or incorrect.
13.04 points
A discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could be improved is present but lacks detail.
14.69 points
A discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could be improved is detailed.
16.5 points
A discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could be improved is thorough.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
5.78 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
6.08 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
6.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
7.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
5.78 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
6.08 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
6.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
7.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
4.95 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
5.21 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
5.87 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
6.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4.95 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.21 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
5.87 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
6.6 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.3 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
3.48 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
3.92 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
4.4 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 415 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 3 DQ 1
Reflect on your personal and professional values and conscious or unconscious biases that influence your leadership style. What is one strength and one weakness of your leadership style? How does your leadership style impact your relationship dynamics and conflict management approach?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 9.6, 10.3.
Topic 3 DQ 2
One of the five elements of emotional intelligence is self-awareness. Explain what it means to be self-aware and describe why emotional intelligence is crucial for effective leadership. Discuss what behaviors someone with a high degree of self-awareness would demonstrate within the context of leading and managing groups. Provide an example.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.2, 9.3, 9.5.
Resources
Collapse All Resources Collapse All
Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving
Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving. Chapter 1 discusses leadership theories an
… Read More
View Resource
Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice
Read “Ethical Practice in Nursing” section of Chapter 1 in Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice.
… Read More
View Resource
Emotional Intelligence in Nursing Leadership
Read “Emotional Intelligence in Nursing Leadership,” by Butler, from Australian Nursing and Midwifery Journal (2021).
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=152572611&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
Interdisciplinary Relationship Dynamics
Read “Interdisciplinary Relationship Dynamics,” by Peek and Campbell, from American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (2
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=142126254&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
Influencing Health Care in the Legislative Arena
Read “Influencing Health Care in the Legislative Arena,” by Abood, from New Hampshire Nursing News (2007). This res
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cul&AN=106289356&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
The Power of Influence: Nurses’ Role in Advocacy and the Legislative Process
Read “The Power of Influence: Nurses’ Role in Advocacy and the Legislative Process,” by Varghese and Moss, from AAACN Viewpoi
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cul&AN=152869671&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
How a Bill Becomes a Law
View “How a Bill Becomes a Law,” by GCU Academics – Nursing (2016), located on the GCU website. This video, which demonstrat
… Read More
https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs440v/how-a-bill-becomes-a-law/
Optional – Core Values
For additional information, the following is recommended:
By completing the activity, “Core Values,” located on the GCU web
… Read More
https://lc.gcumedia.com/mgt410/core-leadership-values/v2.1/#/cv1-view
Optional – Trends in Health Care: A Nursing Perspective
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Chapter 5 of Trends in Health Care: A Nursing Perspective.
… Read More
View Resource
Optional – The Relationship Between the Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care and Emotionally Intelligent Leadership Style
For additional information, the following is recommended:
“The Relationship Between the Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care and
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005110-202012000-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Optional – Mindfulness: A Necessary Leadership Competency
For additional information, the following is recommended:
“Mindfulness: A Necessary Leadership Competency,” by Parchm
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?u
NRS 415 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Creating Change Through Advocacy
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation.
Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.
Identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state. Examples of problems relevant to nursing include, but are not limited to, title “nurse” protection, sharps injury prevention, nursing shortage, nurse well-being, valuation of nursing services, etc. Research the issue you selected and use the attached “Creating Change Through Advocacy” template to complete this assignment.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
9.4: Comply with relevant laws, policies, and regulations.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 4.3, 9.4.
Attachments
NRS-415-RS-T3-Creating Change Through Advocacy.d
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Creating Change Through Advocacy – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total150 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Problem
Describe a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues.
0 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is not present.
9.75 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is present but lacks detail.
12.75 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is detailed.
15 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
Research the Issue
Identify a minimum of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years.
0 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is not present.
14.63 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is incomplete or incorrect.
16.88 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present but lacks evidence of the identified issue or falls outside of the five-year limit.
19.13 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides evidence of the identified issue.
22.5 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides substantive evidence of the identified issue.
Idea for Addressing Solution (B)
Explain an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy. (C9.4)
0 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
14.63 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
16.88 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present but lacks support from research.
19.13 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is detailed and provides support from research.
22.5 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thorough and provides detailed support from research.
Stakeholder Support
Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why.
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is not present.
9.75 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is present.
12.75 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is detailed.
15 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is thorough.
Stakeholder Opposition
Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why.
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is not present.
9.75 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is present but lacks detail on how to debate these considerations.
12.75 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is detailed and includes some detail on how to debate these considerations.
15 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is thorough and includes relevant detail on how to debate these considerations.
Financial Incentives/Costs
Explain the financial impact of the issue and the solution.
0 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete.
9.75 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is present but lacks detail from research.
12.75 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is detailed and includes some supporting detail from research.
15 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is thorough and includes relevant supporting detail from research.
Legislature: Information Needed and Process for Proposal
Discuss how to advocate for the proposal using legislation.
0 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is not present.
9.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is present but lacks substantial detail from research.
12.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is detailed and includes some detail from research.
15 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is thorough and includes substantial detail from research.
Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy
Discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.
0 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is not present.
9.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is incomplete or incorrect.
11.25 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present but lacks detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
12.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is detailed and includes some detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
15 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is thorough and includes substantial detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.63 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.38 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.88 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.63 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
6.38 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 415 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE
NRS 415 Topic Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 4 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Explain what factors lead to conflict in professional practice. Describe how organizational values and culture can influence the way conflict is addressed. Discuss effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and preventing violence.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 5.3, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4.
Topic 4 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Read the scenario and address the discussion question:?
Scenario
You are a member of an interdisciplinary team participating in patient rounds at the start of your shift. You notice the physician charting that the patient is alert and oriented x3, but the patient was clearly confused, which the physician acknowledged during rounds.
Discussion Question
How would you approach this scenario? Apply one of the ethical principles discussed in Dynamics of Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice to this scenario. Discuss how organizational culture can help manage errors.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 5.2, 6.2, 6.4, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3.
NRS 415 Topic 4 Assignment: CLC – Health Care Organization Evaluation
Assessment Description
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
This assignment is to be completed in a group, which will be assigned by your instructor. The presentation will be submitted and graded as a group assignment.
The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate a strategic plan as a means to assess readiness for change within a health care organization or network.
Research a health care organization or network within the United States (e.g., United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, Kaiser Permanente, Cleveland Clinic, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you have chosen to meet the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.
Prepare a 12-15-slide PowerPoint that summarizes your assessment of the organization and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:
Identify the health care organization or network. Discuss the organization’s mission, vision, and values. Describe the types of services that this organization provides and the geographic areas it serves.
Describe the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes based on your findings.
Analyze your selected organization’s strategic plan to determine to what extent it addresses issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
Examine how interprofessional collaboration and shared governance influence organizational culture and values.
Identify a change management theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model would be the best.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.2, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3.
CLC – Health Care Organization Evaluation – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total160 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Health Care Organization or Network
Discuss the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves.
0 points
A discussion of the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves is not present.
16.8 points
A discussion of the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves is incomplete or incorrect.
17.7 points
A discussion of the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves is present but lacks detail.
19.94 points
A discussion of the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves is detailed.
22.4 points
A discussion of the organization’s mission, vision, values, types of services provided, and the geographic areas it serves is thorough.
Organizational Readiness
Describe the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes.
0 points
A description of the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes is not present.
16.8 points
A description of the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.
17.7 points
A description of the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes is present but lacks detail.
19.94 points
A description of the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes is detailed.
22.4 points
A description of the organization’s overall readiness to improve care outcomes is thorough.
Strategic Plan
Analyze the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
0 points
An analysis of the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction is not present.
16.8 points
An analysis of the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction is incomplete or incorrect.
17.7 points
An analysis of the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction is present but lacks detail.
19.94 points
An analysis of the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction is detailed.
22.4 points
An analysis of the organization’s strategic plan for addressing issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction is thorough.
Organizational Culture
Discuss potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan.
0 points
A discussion of potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan is not present.
16.8 points
A discussion of potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan is incomplete or incorrect.
17.7 points
A discussion of potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan is present but lacks detail.
19.94 points
A discussion of potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan is detailed.
22.4 points
A discussion of potential issues within organizational culture and how these issues may affect the strategic plan is thorough.
Change Management Theory
Explain a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan.
0 points
An explanation of a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan is not present.
16.8 points
An explanation of a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan is incomplete or incorrect.
17.7 points
An explanation of a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan is present but lacks detail.
19.94 points
An explanation of a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan is detailed.
22.4 points
An explanation of a change management theory that would best support the organization’s implementation of the strategic plan is thorough.
Layout
Layout
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
12 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
12.64 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
14.24 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
16 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
12 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
12.64 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
14.24 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
16 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.32 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
7.12 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
6 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
6.32 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
7.12 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
8 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 415 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 5 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Continuous quality improvement (CQI) is the responsibility of all nurses and is vital when addressing the challenges of the health care industry. Provide an example of how you would apply CQI in your current or past position. If you are new to health care, select a nurse practice issue and discuss how you would apply CQI to address the issue. Discuss a quality improvement method that could be used to support CQI in your example.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 5.1.
Topic 5 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Discuss how professional nursing organizations support the field of nursing and how they advocate for nursing practice. Explain the value professional nursing organizations have in advocacy and activism related to patient care. Choose a professional nursing organization that relates to your specialty area of interest. Discuss how this organization keeps its members informed of health care changes and opportunities the organization provides for continuing education and professional development.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 9.3.
NRS 415 Topic 5 Assignment: Personal Reflection
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on your collaborative practice within the CLC Health Organization Evaluation assignment.
In 250-500 words, answer the following:
Describe the communication tools and techniques used by your team. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the group when collaborating to complete this project?
What strategy, or approach, would improve your collaborative practice in future projects?
When working in a health care setting, how would interprofessional collaboration work to support quality and the improvement of patient outcomes?
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assigning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 6.2.
Personal Reflection – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total30 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
CLC Team Collaboration
Describe the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group.
0 points
A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is not included.
6.75 points
A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points
A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is included but lacks detail.
8.01 points
A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is detailed.
9 points
A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is thorough.
Interprofessional Collaboration
Describe how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes.
0 points
A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is not included.
6.75 points
A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points
A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is included but lacks detail.
8.01 points
A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is detailed.
9 points
A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is thorough.
Strategy to Improve Collaboration
Discuss a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice.
0 points
A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is not included.
6.75 points
A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points
A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is included but lacks detail.
8.01 points
A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is detailed.
9 points
A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.35 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1.42 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
1.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
1.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
0.9 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
0.95 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.07 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
1.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.