NRS 415 Personal Reflection

Assignment: Personal Reflection

NRS 415 Personal Reflection Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on your collaborative practice within the CLC Health Organization Evaluation assignment.

In 250-500 words, answer the following:

Describe the communication tools and techniques used by your team. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the group when collaborating to complete this project?

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NRS 415 Personal Reflection HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

What strategy, or approach, would improve your collaborative practice in future projects? NRS 415 Personal Reflection

When working in a health care setting, how would interprofessional collaboration work to support quality and the improvement of patient outcomes?

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assigning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 6.2.

NRS 415 Personal Reflection Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total30 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

CLC Team Collaboration

Describe the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group.
0 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is not included.
6.75 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is included but lacks detail. NRS 415 Personal Reflection
8.01 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is detailed.
9 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is thorough.

Interprofessional Collaboration

Describe how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes.
0 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is not included.
6.75 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is included but lacks detail.

8.01 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is detailed.
9 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is thorough. NRS 415 Personal Reflection

Strategy to Improve Collaboration

Discuss a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice.

0 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is not included.

6.75 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is incomplete or incorrect.
7.11 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is included but lacks detail.
8.01 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is detailed.
9 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.35 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1.42 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
1.6 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

1.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. NRS 415 Personal Reflection

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
0.9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

0.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.07 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

1.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

NRS 415 Personal Reflection Sample

A collaborative learning community (CLC) provides students with opportunities to enhance their understanding of research topics, including the evaluation of healthcare organizations based on a developed strategic plan as a means of readiness for change (Alberti et al., 2021). As such, the CLC assignment on the evaluation of Providence Health involved using different techniques. The group used different tools and techniques that included the GCU system CLC group communication wall, email, and WhatApp. The communication tools and techniques enabled the group to effectively coordinate and collaborate to complete the evaluation assignment. The core strengths of the group when collaborating included effective communication and coordination, inclusion, and involvement of all members. For instance, each member of the group worked on a different area of the assignment and shared their findings to enrich the CLC presentation. NRS 415 Personal Reflection However, the core weakness of the group in collaborating to complete the project was time management. Some members required more time to complete their part of the assignment. 

The strategy or approach that can improve the collaborative practice in future projects is effective time management. Time management will enable the members to complete future projects and share their findings before presenting them to larger audiences (Dang et al., 2021). Effective time management will improve coordination and solve any future challenges that may arise during the collaboration.

Inter-professional collaboration is essential in supporting quality and improvement of patient outcomes in health care settings. NRS 415 Personal Reflection Inter-professional collaboration leads to improved coordination and development of a common care plan that allows providers to enhance quality care leading to better patient outcomes. Inter-professional collaboration supports quality and improvement of patient outcomes by suggesting and implementing evidence-based practice approaches (Rawlinson et al., 2021). Again, it supports quality through research activities that lead to better interventions and continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives.

NRS 415 Personal Reflection References

Alberti, S., Motta, P., Ferri, P., & Bonetti, L. (2021). The effectiveness of team-based learning in

            nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104721.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104721.

Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins

evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau.

Rawlinson, C., Carron, T., Cohidon, C., Arditi, C., Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., & Gilles, I. (2021).

An overview of reviews on inter-professional collaboration in primary care: barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5589 NRS 415 Personal Reflection