NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments

NRS 428 Topic 1 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Community/Public Health Nursing

Objectives:

1. Examine the role of the community/public health nurse.
2. Evaluate the role of community stakeholders as client and community partners.
3. Discuss the aspects of health promotion in nursing care of populations.
4. Explain the importance of community resources to planning an intervention.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Assessments
Class Introductions
Assessment Description
Take a moment to explore your new classroom and introduce yourself to your fellow classmates. What are you excited about learning? What do you think will be most challenging?
Topic 1 DQ 1 (1 page, 3 references)
Assessment Description
Explain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with community stakeholders for population health promotion. Explain why it is important to appraise community resources (nonprofit, spiritual/religious, etc.) as part of a community assessment and why these resources are important in population health promotion.
Topic 1 DQ 2 (1 page, 3 references)
Assessment Description
Discuss how geopolitical and phenomenological place influence the context of a population or community assessment and intervention. Describe how the nursing process is utilized to assist in identifying health issues (local or global in nature) and in creating an appropriate intervention, including screenings and referrals, for the community or population.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Resources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
California Department of Public Health
Explore the California Department of Public Health website. In addition, explore the relevant public health site for your own count
… Read More
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/
________________________________________
Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care
Read Chapter 1 in Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care.
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/community-and-public-health_the-future-of-health-care_1e.php
________________________________________
Maricopa County Public Health
Explore the Maricopa County Public Health website. In addition, explore the relevant public health site for your own county or state.
http://www.maricopa.gov/3849/Public-Health
________________________________________
American Public Health Association
Explore the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.
https://www.apha.org/
________________________________________
Jackson County Healthy Communities Coalition
Explore the Jackson County Health Department (JCHCC) website. In addition, explore the relevant public health site for your own county or
… Read More
http://www.jchdonline.org/index.php/planning-and-statistics/healthy-communities-coalition
________________________________________
Optional: Meanings of Knowledge and Identity in Public Health Nursing in a Time of Transition: Interpretations of Public Health Nurses’ Narratives
For additional information, the following is recommended:
“Meanings of Knowledge and Identity in Public Health Nursing in a Tim
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=111811987&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
________________________________________
All the Gear in the CDC’s Disease Detectives Use in the Field
View the “All the Gear in the CDC’s Disease Detectives Use in the Field” video, by WIRED (2018), located on the YouTube website.
… Read More
https://www.youtube.co

NRS 428 Week 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

NRS 428 Week 2 DQ 1

What are social determinants of health? Explain how social determinants of health contribute to the development of disease. Describe the fundamental idea that the communicable disease chain model is designed to represent. Give an example of the steps a nurse can take to break the link within the communicable disease chain.

Resources within your text covering international/global health, and the websites in the topic materials, will assist you in answering this discussion question.

NRS 428 Week 2 DQ 2

Select a global health issue affecting the international health community. Briefly describe the global health issue and its impact on the larger public health care systems (i.e., continents, regions, countries, states, and health departments). Discuss how health care delivery systems work collaboratively to address global health concerns and some of the stakeholders that work on these issues.

Resources within your text covering international/global health, and the websites in the topic materials, will assist you in answering this discussion question.

NRS 428 Topic 2 Assignment: Epidemiology And Communicable Diseases

Objectives:

1. Apply the principles of epidemiology to community health nursing.
2. Explain the value of demographic data in community health.
3. Apply the epidemiology triangle to a communicable disease occurring at a global level.
4. Evaluate the communicable disease chain model.
5. Discuss the impact of global health issues on public health systems.
6. Explain how social determinants of health contribute to the development of disease.
Assessments
Topic 2 DQ 1 (300 words, 3 references)
Assessment Description
What are social determinants of health? Explain how social determinants of health contribute to the development of disease. Describe the fundamental idea that the communicable disease chain model is designed to represent. Give an example of the steps a nurse can take to break the link within the communicable disease chain.
Resources within your text covering international/global health, and the websites in the topic materials, will assist you in answering this discussion question.
Topic 2 DQ 2 (300 words, 3 references)
Assessment Description
Select a global health issue affecting the international health community. Briefly describe the global health issue and its impact on the larger public health care systems (i.e., continents, regions, countries, states, and health departments). Discuss how health care delivery systems work collaboratively to address global health concerns and some of the stakeholders that work on these issues.
Resources within your text covering international/global health, and the websites in the topic materials, will assist you in answering this discussion question.
Epidemiology Paper (8 PAGES, 10 REFERENCES)
Assessment Description
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this assignment.
Communicable Disease Selection
1. Chickenpox
2. Tuberculosis
3. Influenza
4. Mononucleosis
5. Hepatitis B
6. HIV
7. Ebola
8. Measles
9. Polio
10. Influenza
Epidemiology Paper Requirements
1. Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
2. Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
3. Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
4. Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.
5. Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.
6. Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.
A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
Social Determinants of Health
Read “Social Determinants of Health,” from the Healthy People 2030 website.
https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/social-determinants-health
________________________________________
Communicable Disease Chain
Refer to the “Communicable Disease Chain” as needed to complete your assignment.
NRS-428VN-RS2-CommunicableDiseaseChain.doc
________________________________________
World Health Organization
Explore the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
http://www.who.int/en/
________________________________________
2017 National Notifiable Conditions (Historical)
Explore the 2017 National Notifiable Conditions (Historical) page of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/notifiable/2017/
________________________________________
Chain of Infection
Use the media piece “Chain of Infection” to assist you in completing your Topic 2 assignment.
http://lc.gcumedia.com/nsg403c/chain-of-infection/chain-of-infection-v1.1.html
________________________________________
Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care
Read Chapter 2 in Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care.
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/community-and-public-health_the-future-of-health-care_1e.php
________________________________________
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Explore the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) website.
https://www.hhs.gov/
________________________________________
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Explore the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
https://www.cdc.gov/
________________________________________
Families USA
Explore the Families USA website.

Home

Attachments
Epidemiology Paper – Rubric
Collapse All Epidemiology Paper – RubricCollapse All
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.
4. Good
11.5 points
Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.
4. Good
11.5 points
Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors
25 points
Criteria Description
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors
5. Excellent
25 points
The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.
4. Good
23 points
The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.
3. Satisfactory
22 points
The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
20 points
The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data
25 points
Criteria Description
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data
5. Excellent
25 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.
4. Good
23 points
Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.
3. Satisfactory
22 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
20 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease
12.5 points
Criteria Description
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease
5. Excellent
12.5 points
An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.
4. Good
11.5 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Agency and description of contribution are omitted.
Global Implication
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Global Implication
5. Excellent
12.5 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
4. Good
11.5 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
4. Good
5.75 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Good
5.75 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Evidence
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
4. Good
5.75 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
Mechanics of Writing
2.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Excellent
2.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Good
2.3 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Satisfactory
2.2 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
3.75 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Excellent
3.75 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Good
3.45 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Satisfactory
3.3 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

NRS 428 Topic 3 Assignment: Teaching Experience Reflection

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the community teaching experience, describing your observations on the community’s response to the teaching.

In 750-1,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include the following:
Summary of the community teaching plan

Epidemiological rationale for topic

Evaluation of teaching experience

Community response to teaching

Areas of strength and areas for improvement

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.

Teaching Experience Reflection – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Summary of Community Teaching Plan

Summary of community teaching plan.

0 points

Summary of community teaching plan is not present.

11.25 points

Summary of community teaching plan is present, but lacks detail.

11.85 points

Summary of community teaching plan is present.

13.35 points

Summary of community teaching plan is detailed.

15 points

Summary of community teaching plan is thorough.

Epidemiological Rationale for Topic

Epidemiological rational for topic.

0 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is not present.

11.25 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is present, but lacks detail.

11.85 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is present.

13.35 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is detailed.

15 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is thorough.

Evaluation of Teaching Experience

Evaluation of the teaching experience.

0 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is not present.

15 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is present, but lacks detail.

15.8 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is present.

17.8 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is detailed.

20 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is thorough.

Community Response to Teaching Provided

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching.

0 points

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching is not present.

15 points

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching is present, but lacks detail.

15.8 points

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching is present.

17.8 points

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching is detailed.

20 points

A summary of the community’s response to the teaching is thorough.

Areas of Strength and Improvement

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement.

0 points

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement is not present.

15 points

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement is present, but lacks detail.

15.8 points

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement is present.

17.8 points

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement is detailed.

20 points

Discussion of areas of strength and areas of improvement is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

3.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

3.95 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

4.45 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

3.75 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

3.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

4.45 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE

NRS 428 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 3 DQ 1

Compare vulnerable populations. Describe an example of one of these groups in the United States or from another country. Explain why the population is designated as “vulnerable.” Include the number of individuals belonging to this group and the specific challenges or issues involved. Discuss why these populations are unable to advocate for themselves, the ethical issues that must be considered when working with these groups, and how nursing advocacy would be beneficial.

Topic 3 DQ 2

How does the community health nurse recognize bias, stereotypes, and implicit bias within the community? How should the nurse address these concepts to ensure health promotion activities are culturally competent? Propose strategies that you can employ to reduce cultural dissonance and bias to deliver culturally competent care. Include an evidence-based article that address the cultural issue. Cite and reference the article in APA format.

NRS 428 Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 4 DQ 1

Research the delivery, finance, management, and sustainability methods of the U.S. health care system. Evaluate the effectiveness of one or more of these areas on quality patient care and health outcomes. Propose a potential health care reform solution to improve effectiveness in the area you evaluated and predict the expected effect. Describe the effect of health care reform on the U.S. health care system and its respective stakeholders. Support your post with a peer-reviewed journal article.

Topic 4 DQ 2

The Affordable Care Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama in March 2010. Many of the provisions of the law directly affect health care providers. Review the following topic Resources:
“About the Affordable Care Act”

“Health Care Transformation: The Affordable Care Act and More”

What are the most important elements of the Affordable Care Act in relation to community and public health? What is the role of the nurse in implementing this law?

NRS 428 Topic 4 Assignment: Community Assessment and Representative Interview Analysis

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a community assessment in a form of an interview and physical appraisal of the community.

Part I: Assessment

Based on the demographic and community selected in the Topic 3 assignment, perform a physical assessment of the community site using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide,” located in the topic Resources. This document does not need to be filled out, but rather serves as a guide for what to look for in the physical assessment of the community site.

Part II: Interview

Conduct an interview with the appropriate representative selected in Topic 3 regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community. Interviews can take place in person, by phone, or via Zoom.

Develop 5-10 interview questions to gather information about the representative’s role and the health issues faced within the selected community, the role of public health in addressing environmental issues, and the health issues faced within the selected community.

Part III: PowerPoint Presentation

Based on your interview/community assessment, create a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and references slide) describing the chosen community interest.

Include the following in your presentation:

Summary of how the interview went, including responses to the questions.

Description of the community and community boundaries including the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level; ethnic and phenomenological features of the community, as well as types of social interactions; common goals and interests; and barriers and challenges, including any identified social determinants of health.

Summary of community assessment, including funding sources and partnerships.

Based on your findings from the interview/community assessment, discuss any issues that are lacking or can be improved upon for health promotion, modifying your teaching plan as needed to address these findings.

A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA format ting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.

Community Assessment and Representative Interview Analysis – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total125 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Summary of interview.

0 points

Summary of interview is not present.

7.5 points

Summary of interview is present, but lacks detail.

7.9 points

Summary of interview is present.

8.9 points

Summary of interview is detailed.

10 points

Summary of interview is thorough.

Description of the Community

Description of the community and community boundaries.
0 points

Description of the community and community boundaries is not present.
7.5 points

Description of the community and community boundaries is present, but lacks detail.

7.9 points

Description of the community and community boundaries is present.
8.9 points

Description of the community and community boundaries is detailed.
10 points

Description of the community and community boundaries is thorough.

Community Assessment

Summary of community assessment.

0 points

Summary of community assessment is not present.

7.5 points

Summary of community assessment is present, but lacks detail.

7.9 points

Summary of community assessment is present.

8.9 points

Summary of community assessment is detailed.
10 points

Summary of community assessment is thorough.

Issues Identified

Discussion of any issues.
0 points

Discussion of any issues is not present.
7.5 points

Discussion of any issues is present, but lacks detail.

7.9 points

Discussion of any issues is present.

8.9 points

Discussion of any issues is detailed.
10 points

Discussion of any issues is thorough.

Conclusion

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions.
0 points

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions is not present.
7.5 points

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions is present, but lacks detail.

7.9 points

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions is present.
8.9 points

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions is detailed.

10 points

A conclusion summarizing key findings and impressions is thorough.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content
0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

28.13 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.

29.63 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

33.38 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

37.5 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout
0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

9.38 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
9.88 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

11.13 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

12.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

9.38 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

9.88 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

11.13 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

12.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4.69 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

4.94 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

5.56 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
6.25 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4.69 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.94 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.56 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

NRS 428 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 5 DQ 1

What spiritual considerations surrounding a disaster can arise for individuals, communities, and health care providers? Explain your answer in the context of a natural or human caused disaster. How can a community health nurse apply the Christian worldview to the care of the individual, community, self, and colleagues during disaster management?

Topic 5 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Watch the “Diary of Medical Mission Trip” videos dealing with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Reflect on this natural disaster by answering the following questions:

Propose one example of a nursing intervention related to the disaster from each of the following levels: primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention. Provide innovative examples that have not been discussed by previous students.

Under which phase of the disaster do the three proposed interventions fall? Explain why you chose that phase.

What people or agencies would you work with in facilitating the proposed interventions and why?

NRS 428 Topic 5 Assignment: Benchmark – Community Teaching Presentation

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to present the selected topic to the identified community based on the community teaching plan.

Prepare a presentation using the “Community Teaching Plan” and feedback received from your selected representative. You will work with your selected representative to confirm the time and date to present your selected topic to the community.

Options for Delivery

Select one of the following options for delivery and prepare the applicable presentation:

PowerPoint Presentation (no more than 30 minutes)

Pamphlet Presentation (one to two pages)

Poster Presentation

Community Teaching Experience Approval Form

Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative using the “Community Teaching Experience Approval Form.” Submit this form as directed in the Community Teaching Experience Approval assignment drop box. The “Community Teaching Experience Approval” form is a clinical document that is necessary to meet clinical requirements for this course. Therefore, the acknowledgement form should be submitted with the provider’s hand-written signature. A typed, electronic signature will not be accepted.

Please note: For this assignment you will submit the presentation deliverable.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

4.1: Provide individualized education to diverse patient populations in a variety of health care settings.

Benchmark – Community Teaching Presentation – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Teaching

Teaching is based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is incorporated.
0 points

Teaching is not based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is not incorporated.
18 points

Teaching is based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is incorporated, but lacks detail.
18.96 points

Teaching is based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is incorporated.
21.36 points

Teaching is based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is incorporated in a detailed manner.

24 points

Teaching is based on the teaching plan, and feedback received is incorporated in a thorough manner.

Teaching Plan Presentation (B)

Teaching plan is presented using one of the options given. (C4.1)
0 points

Teaching plan is not presented using one of the options given.

18 points

Teaching plan is presented using one of the options given, loosely adhering to the guidelines outlined.

18.96 points

Teaching plan is presented using one of the options given.

21.36 points

Teaching plan is presented using one of the options given, adhering to the guidelines outlined.

24 points

Teaching plan is presented using one of the options given, closely adhering to the guidelines outlined.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content
0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

36 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

37.92 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

42.72 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

48 points

Layout

0 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
4.74 points

5.34 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

6 points

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

0 points

4.5 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

4.74 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

5.34 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

6 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

4.74 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

5.34 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

4.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.34 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NRS 428 Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Weekly Discussions & Assignments