NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)

NRS 433 Topic 1 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 1 DQ 1

PICOT is utilized by the health care community to identify and study a nursing practice problem. Consequently, PICOT examples that may provide insight into the use of the PICOT process may not be relevant to nursing practice as they are based on a medical practice problem.

Define evidence-based practice. Describe the difference between a nursing practice problem and a medical practice problem. Provide one example of each. Discuss why is it important to ensure your PICOT is based on a nursing practice problem.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Topic 1 DQ 2

Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have seen in nursing. Provide an overview of the problem and discuss how addressing the problem through nursing research can improve patient outcomes. Provide rationale and support for your answer.

NRS 433 Topic 1 Assignment Literature Evaluation Table
Assessment Description

The first step of the evidence-based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment. Prior to starting the “Literature Evaluation Table,” complete the following:

Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. Note: This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem. A mixed methods article can qualify towards meeting a qualitative or quantitative methodology.

Articles must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments. The PICOT question will also provide a framework for your capstone project.

Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic reviews, literature reviews, and metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS-T1-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx

ICOT Question and Literature Search – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Summary of Nursing Practice Problem

0 points

A nursing practice problem is omitted.

4.5 points

A nursing practice problem is partially presented. Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies.

4.74 points

A nursing practice problem is presented and includes some relevant details and explanation.

5.34 points

A nursing practice problem is detailed.

6 points

A nursing practice problem is thoroughly described.

PICOT Question

0 points

A PICOT question is omitted.

9 points

A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The PICOT question format is used incorrectly.

9.48 points

A PICOT question is provided, and the PICOT question format is generally applied.

10.68 points

A PICOT question is provided, and the PICOT question format is applied accurately.
12 points

A PICOT question is provided, and the PICOT question format is applied accurately. An answerable and researchable question is presented.

APA-Formatted Article Citations With Permalinks

0 points

Article citations and permalinks are omitted.
4.5 points

There are significant errors in the APA format. One or more permalinks are incorrect or omitted.

4.74 points

Article citations are presented in APA format, but there are minor errors. Permalinks are included.

5.34 points

N/A
6 points

Article citations are accurately presented in APA format and permalinks are correct.

Relationship of Articles to the PICOT Question

Relationship of Articles to the PICOT Question
0 points

Articles and their relationship to PICOT question are omitted.

9 points

At least two articles do not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide a small degree of support for the PICOT question. Different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question.

9.48 points

At least one article does not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide general support for the PICOT question. One or two different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question.

10.68 points

Each article relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide support for the PICOT question.

12 points

Each article clearly relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide strong support for the PICOT question.

Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method Articles

0 points

Identification of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods and justification for identified methodology is omitted.

9 points

Identification of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods is included but is not accurate for three or more articles. A justification for the identified methodology is included but lacks significant details.
9.48 points

Identification of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods is included but is not accurate for two articles. A general justification for the identified methodology is included.

10.68 points

Identification of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods is included but is not accurate for one article. A clear justification for the identified methodology is included.
12 points

Identification of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods is correctly identified and includes a thorough justification for the identified methodology for all articles.

Purpose Statements

0 points

Purpose statements are omitted.
4.5 points

Purpose statements are not clearly summarized and contain major inaccuracies.

4.74 points

Purpose statements contain minor inaccuracies in some areas.

5.34 points

Purpose statements are clearly summarized.
6 points

Purpose statements are accurate and thoroughly summarized.

Research Questions

Research Questions
0 points

Research questions are omitted.
4.5 points

The research questions have been misidentified for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research question for several of the articles.
4.74 points

The research question has been misidentified for at least one of the articles.
5.34 points

Research questions are clear.
6 points

Research questions are accurate and capture the fundamental question posed by the researchers in each study.

Outcomes

Outcomes
0 points

Research outcomes are omitted.

4.5 points

Research outcomes are presented for each article. The research outcomes have been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for several of the articles.

4.74 points

Research outcomes are presented. The research outcomes have been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for one or two articles.
5.34 points

Research outcomes are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas.
6 points

Research outcomes are accurate and described in detail for each article.

Setting

Setting
0 points

The setting is omitted.
4.5 points

The setting in which the researcher conducted the study for each article is incorrect or incomplete.
4.74 points

The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is indicated for each article and includes some relevant details and explanation.

5.34 points

The setting is in which the researcher conducted the study is clearly indicated for each article.
6 points

The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and accurate for each article.

Sample

0 points

The sample is omitted.
4.5 points

The sample that is indicated for each article is incorrect or incomplete.
4.74 points

The sample is indicated for each article and includes some relevant details and explanation.
5.34 points

The sample is indicated for each article.

6 points

The sample is indicated and accurate for each article.

Methods

0 points

A discussion on the methods utilized in the study for each article is not included.
4.5 points

A discussion on the methods utilized in the study is partially presented for each article and is missing key information.

4.74 points

A discussion on the methods utilized in the study for each article is present and includes some relevant details and explanation.
5.34 points

A clear discussion on the methods utilized in the study for each article is presented.
6 points

A thorough discussion on the methods utilized in the study for each article is presented.

Key Findings and Implications for Nursing Practice

0 points

Discussion of the study results, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, are omitted.
4.5 points

Discussion of the study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is presented but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
4.74 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented for each article. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.

5.34 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, includes relevant details and explanation.
6 points

Discussion of study results, including key findings of the study and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with relevant details and extensive explanation.

Recommendations of the Researcher

Recommendations of the Researcher
0 points

Researcher recommendations are omitted.

4.5 points

Researcher recommendations for each article are inaccurate or incomplete.
4.74 points

Researcher recommendations for each article are presented and include some relevant details and explanation.
5.34 points

Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented.
6 points

Researcher recommendations accurate are thoroughly described for each article.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

9.48 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
10.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

12 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

9.48 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

10.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

12 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

NRS 433 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 2 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Qualitative data have been described as voluminous and sometimes overwhelming to the researcher. Discuss two strategies that would help a researcher manage and organize the data.

Topic 2 DQ 2

Assessment Description

The three types of qualitative research designs are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. Compare the differences and similarities between two of the three types of qualitative studies and give an example of each.

NRS 433 Topic 2 Assignment: Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Assessment Description

In this assignment, you will write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies.

For this assignment, use the nursing practice problem and two qualitative peer-reviewed research articles you identified in Topic 1 (or two new articles based on instructor feedback in Topic 1). In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, summarize two qualitative studies.

Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part I” document to organize your essay.

You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS-T2-ResearchCritiqueGuidelinesPart

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total190 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Qualitative Studies

0 points

Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.

7.13 points

Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.
7.51 points

N/A

8.46 points

N/A

9.5 points

Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose, and PICOT Question

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose, and PICOT Question
0 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem, purpose of the essay, or PICOT question is not included.

7.13 points

Introduction does not include a clear description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is not clearly written and is missing some of the necessary elements.

7.51 points

Introduction includes a basic description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is present.

8.46 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a clear manner. The PICOT question is clear and includes all elements.

9.5 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a comprehensive manner. The PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and includes all elements.

Background of Studies

0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not included.

7.13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not clearly written and lacks information.
7.51 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

8.46 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details.
9.5 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and an extensive explanation.

Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem

0 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is not included.

18.53 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles generally compare to those identified in the PICOT question.

21.98 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
24.7 points

A thorough discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.

Method of Studies

0 points

A discussion on the method of study for each article is not included.
19.95 points

A partial discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

21.01 points

A general discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are included but the description is general.

23.67 points

A detailed discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented.

26.6 points

A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.

Results of Studies

Results of Studies
0 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is not included.
19.95 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is unclear and incomplete.

21.01 points

A general discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is included.
23.67 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
26.6 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Ethical Considerations

0 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is not included. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is not included.
19.95 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research unclear. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is incomplete.

21.01 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is discussed in basic manner. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is included.

23.67 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is clearly discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is through.

26.6 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is comprehensively discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

9.98 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

10.51 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

11.84 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

13.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

9.98 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
10.51 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

11.84 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

13.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

8.55 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

9.01 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

10.15 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

11.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8.55 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

9.01 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

10.15 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
11.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

5.7 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

6.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

NRS 433 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 3 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Provide examples of experimental and nonexperimental research design. Contrast the levels of control applied to each.

Topic 3 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Describe sampling theory and provide examples to illustrate your definition. Discuss generalizability as it applies to nursing research.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE

NRS 433 Topic 3 Assignment: Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Assessment Description

In this assignment, you will write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment (or two new articles based on instructor feedback in Topic 1) to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250-word essay, summarize two quantitative studies.

Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS-T3-ResearchCritiqueGuidelin

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total190 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Quantitative Studies

0 points

Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research.

7.13 points

Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research.

7.51 points

N/A

8.46 points

N/A
9.5 points

Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research.

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose and Picot Question

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose and Picot Question
0 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem, purpose of the essay, or PICOT question is not included.

7.13 points

Introduction does not include a clear description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is not clearly written and is missing some of the necessary elements.

7.51 points

Introduction includes a basic description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is present.
8.46 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a clear manner. The PICOT question is clear and includes all elements.
9.5 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a comprehensive manner. The PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and includes all elements.

Background of Studies

Background of Studies
0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not included.

7.13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not clearly written and lacks information.
7.51 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
8.46 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details.

9.5 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and an extensive explanation.

Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem

Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem
0 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is not included.

18.53 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is unclear or lacking information.

19.51 points

Method of Studies

Method of Studies
0 points

A discussion on the method of study for each article is not included.

19.95 points

21.01 points

A general discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are included but the description is general.
23.67 points

A detailed discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented.
26.6 points

Results of Studies

Results of Studies
0 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is not included.

19.95 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is unclear and incomplete.

21.01 points

A general discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is included.
23.67 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
26.6 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations
0 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is not included. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is not included.
19.95 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research unclear. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is incomplete.

21.01 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is discussed in basic manner. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is included.

23.67 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is clearly discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is through.

26.6 points

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

9.98 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

10.51 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
11.84 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
13.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
9.98 points

10.51 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

13.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

8.55 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
9.01 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

10.15 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
11.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

8.55 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
9.01 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

10.15 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

11.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

5.7 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

6.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

NRS 433 Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 4 DQ 1

Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables. Describe two ways that researchers attempt to control extraneous variables. Support your answer with peer-reviewed articles.

Topic 4 DQ 2

Describe the seven “levels of evidence” and provide an example of the type of practice change that could result from each.

NRS 433 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 5 DQ 1

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based literature.

Topic 5 DQ 2

According to the textbook, nurses in various settings are adopting a research-based (or evidence-based) practice that incorporates research findings into their decisions and interactions with patients. How do you see this being applied in your workplace? In addition, how can you strive to make spirituality and self-care a practice for your patients as well as yourself? How does this practice align with the Christian worldview?

NRS 433 Topic 5 Assignment: Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft
Assessment Description

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750-word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research critiques on two articles for each type of study (four articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Use the “Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft” document to organize your essay. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Please note that there are two new additional sections: Outcomes Comparison and Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS-T5-Research-Critique-PI

Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total260 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficiently

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5.Excellent

Evidence of Revision

0 points

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

19.5 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision is incomplete.

20.54 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

23.14 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

26 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose, and PICOT Question

Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose, and PICOT Question
0 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is not included. PICOT question is not included.
9.75 points

Introduction does not include a clear description of the nursing practice problem or purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is not adequately or clearly written and is missing the necessary elements.
10.27 points

Introduction includes a basic description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is present.

11.57 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a clear manner. The PICOT question is clear and includes all elements.

13 points

Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a comprehensive manner. The PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and includes all elements.

Background of Studies

0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not included.

9.75 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not clearly written and lacks information.

10.27 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
11.57 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details.

13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and an extensive explanation.

Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem

0 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is not included.

9.75 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is unclear or lacking information. PICOT question or how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question.

10.27 points

11.57 points

13 points

Method of Studies

Method of Studies
0 points

A discussion on the method of study for each article is not included.

9.75 points

A partial discussion of the method of study for each article and a comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

10.27 points

A general discussion on the method of study for each article and a comparison of study methods are presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are included but the description is general.
11.57 points

A detailed discussion on the method of study for each article and a comparison of study methods are presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented.

13 points

A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article and a comparison of the study methods are presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.

Results of Studies

Results of Studies
0 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is not included.
9.75 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is unclear and incomplete.

10.27 points

A general discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is included.

11.57 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
13 points

A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations
0 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research are not included. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is not included.

9.75 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research are unclear. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is incomplete.

10.27 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research are discussed in basic manner. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is included.

11.57 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research are clearly discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is through.

13 points

Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research are comprehensively discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Outcomes Comparison

0 points

Explanation of the anticipated outcomes for the PICOT question is not included. The outcomes of four articles and the comparison to the anticipated outcomes are not included.

29.25 points

Explanation of the anticipated outcomes for the PICOT question is unclear. The outcomes of four or less selected articles and the comparison to the anticipated outcomes are incomplete.

30.81 points

Explanation of the anticipated outcomes for the PICOT question is included in a general manner. The outcomes of the four selected articles and the comparison to the anticipated outcomes are basic.

34.71 points

Explanation of the anticipated outcomes for the PICOT question is clear and includes relevant details. The outcomes of the four selected articles and the comparison to the anticipated outcomes are thorough.

39 points

Explanation of the anticipated outcomes for the PICOT question is thorough with substantial relevant details and an extensive explanation. The outcomes of the four selected articles and the comparison to the anticipated outcomes are comprehensive.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

0 points

The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the identified nursing practice problem is not included. The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

29.25 points

The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the identified nursing practice problem is not clearly identified. The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete.

30.81 points

The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the identified nursing practice problem is explained in a general manner. The proposed evidence-based practice change is basic.
34.71 points

The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the identified nursing practice problem is clearly explained. The proposed evidence-based practice change is clear with relevant details.
39 points

The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the identified nursing practice problem is substantially explained. The proposed evidence-based practice change is thorough with substantial and relevant details.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

13.65 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
14.38 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

16.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
18.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

13.65 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

18.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

11.7 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
12.32 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

13.88 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

15.6 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
11.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
12.32 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

13.88 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

15.6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

7.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

8.22 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

9.26 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

10.4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NRS 433 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)