NRS 440 Topic 4 Assignment: Advocacy Through Legislation

NRS 440 Topic 4 Assignment: Advocacy Through Legislation

NRS 440 Topic 4 Assignment: Advocacy Through Legislation

Assessment Description

Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.

For this assignment, identify a problem or concern in your state, community, or organization that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation. Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template, attached, to complete this assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 440 Topic 4 Assignment: Advocacy Through Legislation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-440VN-RS4-AdvocacyThroughL

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Advocacy Through Legislation – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total155 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Problem, Those Affected, Current Ramifications, and Consequences if Problem Continues

A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues.

0 points

A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is omitted or inaccurate.
17.44 points

A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues lacks detail or is incomplete.
18.37 points

A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented.
20.69 points

A detailed description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented.
23.25 points

A clear and accurate description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented.

Idea for Addressing Solution

An outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy.

0 points

An outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy is omitted or inaccurate.
11.63 points

An outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.25 points

An outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present.
13.8 points

detailed outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present.

15.5 points

A thorough and accurate outline addressing the issue and explaining why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present.

Research Supporting Solution for Problem

Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states.

0 points

Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states is omitted or inaccurate.
17.44 points

Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states lacks detail or is incomplete.

18.37 points

Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states is present.
20.69 points

Detailed substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states is present.
23.25 points

Thorough and accurate substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states is present.

Stakeholder Support

A discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it.

0 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it, is omitted or inaccurate.

11.63 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.25 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it, is present.
13.8 points

A detailed discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it, is present.

15.5 points

A thorough and accurate discussion of significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea and why they support it, is present.

Stakeholder Opposition

A discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea.
0 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea is omitted or inaccurate.
11.63 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.25 points

A discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea is present.
13.8 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 440 Topic 4 Assignment: Advocacy Through Legislation HERE

A detailed discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea is present.
15.5 points

A thorough and accurate discussion of significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea and why they are opposed to the idea is present.

Financial Incentives and Costs

A summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea.

0 points

A summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea is omitted or inaccurate.
11.63 points

A summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea lacks detail or is incomplete.

12.25 points

A summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea is present.
13.8 points

A detailed summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea is present.

15.5 points

A thorough and accurate summary of the financial impact for the issue and idea is present.

Legislature Process and Information for Proposal

A discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal.
0 points

A discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal is omitted or inaccurate.

11.63 points

A discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.25 points

A discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal is present.
13.8 points

A detailed discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal is present.
15.5 points

A thorough and accurate discussion of legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal is present.

Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy

A discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.
0 points

A discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is omitted or inaccurate.
11.63 points

A discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.25 points

A discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present.

13.8 points

A detailed discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present.
15.5 points

A thorough and accurate discussion about how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present.

Research

Research

0 points

No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
5.81 points

Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

6.12 points

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
6.9 points

Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
7.75 points

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
2.33 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

2.45 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2.76 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3.1 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style
0 points

Sources are not documented.
3.49 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
3.67 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4.14 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
4.65 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.