NRS 445 Topic 1 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 445 Topic 1 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 445 Topic 1 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to refine the PICOT question you developed in the discussion forum this week and begin evaluating literature that you will use in subsequent weeks to write your research paper.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment. Prior to starting the “Literature Evaluation Table,” complete the following:

Review the feedback you have received in the discussion forum related to your PICOT question so far. Make any necessary edits to your PICOT question.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 445 Topic 1 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Conduct a literature search to locate four research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. Note: This literature search should include two quantitative and two qualitative, peer-reviewed, primary research articles to support your nursing practice problem. A mixed methods article can qualify towards meeting a qualitative or quantitative methodology. The two articles identified in Topic 1 DQ 2 can be used should you still find them relevant to your PICOT question.

Articles must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

The PICOT question and four peer-reviewed research articles you chose will be utilized for subsequent assignments.

Note: For best search results, do not include the words qualitative and quantitative in your search terms. Do include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic reviews, literature reviews, and metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 1.2, 3.5, 4.1, 4.2

AttachmentsNRS-445-RS-T1-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docxNRS-445-RS-T1-LiteratureEvaluationTable E

Literature Evaluation Table – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 150 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

PICO(T) Question

Identification of components within PICO(T) Question template and intervention question.
0 points

Identification of components within PICO(T) Question template and intervention question is not present.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Identification of components within PICO(T) Question template intervention question is incomplete or inaccurate.
6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of components within PICO(T) Question template and intervention question is present and accurate.

Problem Statement

Identification of problem statement
0 points

Identification of problem statement is not present.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Identification of problem statement is incomplete or inaccurate.
6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of problem statement is present and accurate.

APA Reference

APA reference including permalink or working link used to access article
0 points

APA reference including permalink or working link used to access article is missing from two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

APA reference including permalink or working link used to access article is missing from one article, or the references are inaccurate.
6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

APA reference including permalink or working link used to access the article for all four articles are present.

Purpose/Aim of Study

Description of purpose or aim of study

0 points

Description of purpose or aim of study is not present for two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Description of purpose or aim of study is missing for one article or lacks detail.
6.68 points

N/A

7.5 points

Description of purpose or aim of study is thorough for all four articles.

Research Question

Identification of research question

0 points

Identification of research question is not present for two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A

5.93 points

Identification of research question is missing for one article or lacks detail.
6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of research question is thorough for all four articles.

Design

Explanation of type of study method used

0 points

Explanation of type of study method used is not present for two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A

5.93 points

Explanation of type of study method used is missing for one article or lacks detail.

6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Explanation of type of study method used is thorough for all four articles.

Setting

Identification of the location and type of setting

0 points

Identification of the location and type of setting is not present for two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Identification of the location and type of setting is missing for one article or lacks detail.

6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of the location and type of setting is thorough for all four articles.

Sample

Identification of the number and characteristics of the participants in the sample
0 points

Identification of the number and characteristics of the participants in the sample is not present for two or more articles.
5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Identification of the number and characteristics of the participants in the sample is missing for one article or lacks detail.
6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of the number and characteristics of the participants in the sample is thorough for all four articles.

Methods

Identification of interventions or instruments
0 points

Identification of interventions or instruments is not present for two or more articles.

5.63 points

N/A
5.93 points

Identification of interventions or instruments is missing for one article or lacks detail.

6.68 points

N/A
7.5 points

Identification of interventions or instruments is thorough for all four articles.

Analysis

Description of how the collected data was analyzed
0 points

Description of how the collected data was analyzed is not present for two or more articles.
11.25 points

N/A

11.85 points

Description of how the collected data was analyzed is missing for one article or lacks detail.
13.35 points

N/A
15 points

Description of how the collected data was analyzed is thorough for all four articles.

Outcomes

Summary of study results including outcomes or key findings and implications for nursing practice

0 points

Summary of study results including outcomes or key findings and implications for nursing practice is not present for two or more articles.
11.25 points

N/A
11.85 points

Summary of study results including outcomes or key findings and implications for nursing practice is missing for one article or lacks detail.
13.35 points

N/A
15 points

Summary of study results including outcomes or key findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough for all four articles.

Recommendations

Recommendations of the researcher based on outcomes or key findings of the study

0 points

Recommendations of the researcher based on outcomes or key findings of the study is not present for two or more articles.

11.25 points

N/A
11.85 points

Recommendations of the researcher based on outcomes or key findings of the study is missing for one article or lacks detail.
13.35 points

N/A
15 points

Recommendations of the researcher based on outcomes or key findings of the study is thorough for all four articles.

PICO(T) Question Support

Explanation of how this article supports the proposed PICO(T) question.

0 points

Explanation of how this article supports the proposed PICO(T) question is not present for two or more articles.

16.88 points

N/A
17.78 points

Explanation of how this article supports the proposed PICO(T) question is missing for one article or lacks detail.

20.03 points

N/A
22.5 points

Explanation of how this article supports the proposed PICO(T) question is thorough for all four articles.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

6.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
7.11 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

8.01 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
9 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

4.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

5.34 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.