NRS 450 Assignment: Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

NRS 450 Assignment: Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

NRS 450 Assignment: Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to examine Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) to determine their application in addressing health equity. Develop a presentation outlining task force goals and relevant information for implementing a CDSS system to improve equity of care and promote health for all patients.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 450 Assignment: Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity
HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

This assignment has indirect care experience requirements. The “Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 3 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in Topics 3, 4 and 5. As progress is made on this and subsequent assignments, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5. In your role as a nurse informatics, you have been asked by the Chief Informatics Officer (CIO) to evaluate several clinical decision-making tools to be used by your organization’s stakeholders. The selected Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) will be used to analyze the current state of health equity and information literacy in your organization.

Your first step is to create a task force of stakeholders to participate in the CDSS selection process. Prepare a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for the first task force meeting to include these agenda items:

Reason for the Project: Explain the organizational need, reason for the project, rationale for implementing a clinical decision-making tool in your organization. Discuss how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization.

Task Force Selection: Explain why you have been selected to lead this project. In your speaker notes, explain the role of each stakeholder and why they were selected to serve on this task force.

Research: Conduct research and identify one popular CDSS system used in the health care industry, include a description of the CDSS system.

Basic Concepts of Systems: Review the information and communication technologies (in the electronic health record, mobile health, and telehealth systems). Select one communication technology and discuss how a clinical decision-making tool can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care.

Crucial Functionality: Describe the crucial functions of the selected CDSS. Explain why it is essential to the clinical workflow. Explain the impact of the CDSS on health information exchange, interoperability, and integration of health care.

Task Force Communication: Describe how communication technologies support documentation of care and communication among providers and patients at all system levels. Discuss how communication technology will be used to communicate with the task force members during the project.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

The title slide and reference slide are not included in the slide count. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50-75 words.

Cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

8.2: Use information and communication technology to gather data, create information, and generate knowledge.

8.4: Use information and communication technology to support documentation of care and communication among providers, patients, and all system levels.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 8.2 and 8.4

Resources

Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All

The Pursuit of Health Equity in Digital Transformation, Health Informatics, and the Cardiovascular Learning Healthcare System

Read “The Pursuit of Health Equity in Digital Transformation, Health Informatics, and the Cardiovascular Learning Healthcare System,&

… Read More

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100160

Provocations for Reimagining Informatics Approaches to Health Equity

Read “Provocations for Reimagining Informatics Approaches to Health Equity,” by Valez, Ancker, and Veinot, from Yearbook

… Read More

https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0042-1742514

Assessing the Value of ChatGPT for Clinical Decision Support Optimization

Read “Assessing the Value of ChatGPT for Clinical Decision Support Optimization,” by Wright, from MedRxiv (2023). This a

… Read More

https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.21.23286254

Argumentation Approaches for Explainable AI in Medical Informatics

Read “Argumentation Approaches for Explainable AI in Medical Informatics,” by Caroprese, Vocaturo, and Zumpano, from Intellig

… Read More

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isw

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total160 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Reason for the Project (B)

Explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization. (C8.2)

0 points

An explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization is missing.
18 points

An explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization is inaccurate and incomplete.

18.96 points

An explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization is present, but lacks detail.
21.36 points

An explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization is detailed.
24 points

An explanation of the need and reason for the project, why you need a clinical decision-making tool, and how CDSS can improve health equity and information literacy in your organization is thorough and accurate.

Task Force Selection

Explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected.
0 points

An explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected is missing.
12 points

An explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected is inaccurate and incomplete.

12.64 points

An explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected is present but lacks detail.
14.24 points

An explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected is detailed.

16 points

An explanation of why you were selected, the role of each stakeholder, and why they were selected is thorough and accurate.

Research

Identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system.
0 points

An identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system, is missing.

12 points

An identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system, is inaccurate and incomplete.
12.64 points

An identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system, is present but lacks detail.
14.24 points

An identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system, is detailed.

16 points

An identification of one popular CDSS system used in the healthcare industry, including description of the CDSS system, is thorough and accurate.

Basic Concepts of Systems

Selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care.
0 points

A selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care, is missing.

12 points

A selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care, is inaccurate and incomplete.

12.64 points

A selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care, is present but lacks detail.
14.24 points

A selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care, is detailed.

16 points

A selection of the basic concepts of electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth systems in enabling patient care, including discussion on how one of the clinical decision-making tools can be incorporated to improve health equity in patient care, is thorough and accurate.

Crucial Functionality (B)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 450 Assignment: Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity
HERE

Description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care. (C8.4)
0 points

A description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care, are missing.
18 points

A description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care, are inaccurate and incomplete.
18.96 points

A description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care, are present but lack detail.
21.36 points

A description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care, are detailed.

24 points

A description of the crucial functions of the selected CDSS and explanation of why it is essential to the clinical workflow, including the impact of the CDSS on the health information exchange, interoperability, and integration on health care, are thorough and accurate.

Task Force Communication

Description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project.

0 points

A description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project, is missing.
12 points

A description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project, is inaccurate and incomplete.
12.64 points

A description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project, is present but lacks detail.

14.24 points

A description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project, is detailed.

16 points

A description of how communication technology supports documentation of care and communication among providers, patient, and all system levels, including how communication technologies will be used with the task force members during the project, is thorough and accurate.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content
0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
12 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
12.64 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

14.24 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
16 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout
0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

6 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

6.32 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

7.12 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
8 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
6 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
6.32 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
7.12 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

8 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.32 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

7.12 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
6.32 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

7.12 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.