NRS-451 Organizational Culture and Values

NRS-451 Organizational Culture and Values

Assessment Description
Prepare a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation, with speaker notes, that examines the significance of an organization’s culture and values. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the Topic Materials for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning, and an additional slide for References at the end.

1. Outline the purpose of an organization’s mission, vision, and values.
2. Explain why an organization’s mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes.
3. Explain what factors lead to conflict in a professional practice. Describe how organizational values and culture can influence the way conflict is
addressed.
4. Discuss effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration.
5. Discuss how organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes. Describe how these relate to health promotion
and disease prevention from a community health perspective.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Rubric

Purpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values assessment

Purpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values

10.4 points

Criteria Description

Purpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values

5. Excellent

10.4 points

Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is accurate and clearly outlined.

4. Good

9.26 points

Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is outlined. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

8.22 points

Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.8 points

Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is partially summarized. There are omissions and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is omitted.

Significance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes assessment

Significance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes

10.4 points

Criteria Description

Significance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes

5. Excellent

10.4 points

A detailed explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Sound rationale is provided for support. The significance is clearly established.

4. Good

9.26 points

An explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Some rationale or information is needed for support. The significance is generally established.

3. Satisfactory

8.22 points

A summary of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. The significance is partially established.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.8 points

An incomplete explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. There are omissions and inaccuracies. The significance is not established.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is omitted.

Factors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice assessment

Factors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice

10.4 points

Criteria Description

Factors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice and Influence of Organizational Values and Culture in Addressing Conflict

5. Excellent

10.4 points

An explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is clearly presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described in detail. Strong rationale and evidence are provided for support.

4. Good

9.26 points

An explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described. Some information or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

8.22 points

A general explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. A summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. Some aspects are unclear. More information and rationale are needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.8 points

Factors leading to conflict in a professional practice are partially presented. A vague summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. There are significant omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Factors leading to conflict in a professional practice are omitted.

Effective Strategies for Resolving Conflict assessment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Effective Strategies for Resolving Conflict

10.4 points

Criteria Description

Effective Strategies for Resolving Workplace Conflict and Encouraging Interprofessional Collaboration

5. Excellent

10.4 points

Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Strong support and rationale are provided to support each strategy.

4. Good

9.26 points

Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Some detail or rationale is needed for clarity or support.

3. Satisfactory

8.22 points

Strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are generally discussed. The proposed strategies are relevant and would be generally effective for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration. More evidence and rationale are needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.8 points

Strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are partially discussed. It is unclear how the proposed strategies would be effective; the proposed strategies are not relevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are omitted.

Influence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes assessment

Influence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes

10.4 points

Criteria Description

Influence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes

5. Excellent

10.4 points

How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is clearly discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described in detail. The relationship among these is established. Rationale and evidence is provided for support.

4. Good

9.26 points

How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described. The relationship among these is generally established. Some information or rationale is needed.

3. Satisfactory

8.22 points

How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is generally discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is summarized. The relationship among these is not clearly established. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.8 points

How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is partially presented. There are major omissions and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is not discussed.

Presentation of Content assessment

Presentation of Content

52 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

52 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

46.28 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

41.08 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

39 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout assessment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Layout

6.5 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

6.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

5.79 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.88 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) assessment

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

6.5 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

6.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

5.79 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.88 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

6.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

6.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

5.79 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.88 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

6.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

6.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

5.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.88 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.