NRS 451 Week 3 Assignment: Executive Summary in Leadership and Management

NRS 451 Week 3 Assignment: Executive Summary in Leadership and Management

NRS 451 Week 3 Assignment: Executive Summary in Leadership and Management

Executive Summary in Leadership and Management

Improving the quality of patient care is the primary goal of every healthcare organization. High-quality care results in positive health outcomes, including reduced readmission, low cost of healthcare, and reduced length of stay. The positive health results then lead to nurses’ job satisfaction and positive patient experience. This paper presents a quality improvement initiative to be implemented in the healthcare organization, including the purpose of the quality improvement initiative, target population, the benefits of the initiative, interprofessional collaboration, budget justification, and the basis for evaluating the quality improvement initiative.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 451 Week 3 Assignment: Executive Summary in Leadership and Management HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

The Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative

The selected quality improvement initiative aimed at addressing nursing shortages to improve patient safety and reduce turnover rate among healthcare professionals. The nursing shortage is a major issue facing the healthcare organization and has reached crisis proportions. Thus, the current situation should be analyzed, and a plan making necessary modifications to address the shortage should be implemented, which will reduce patient safety issues in the organization.

The Target Population

The proposed quality improvement initiative involves contracting agency nursing staff to provide the healthcare organization with appropriate nurse staffing temporarily until the current staffing challenge is completely resolved. Therefore, this quality improvement initiative targets nurses working in healthcare organization and patients. Contracting agency nursing staff would increase the number of nurses working in the medical facility, reducing the nurse-to-patient ratio and nurses’ workload and working hours, which will improve the quality and safety of patient care.

The Benefits of the Quality Improvement Initiative

The proposed quality improvement initiative involves contracting agency nursing staff to raise the number of nurses working in the healthcare organization. Increasing nursing staff will then reduce the number of patients allocated to an individual nurse. According to Faltas and Abd-Allah (2018), nurses’ workload significantly contributes to the quality, efficiency, and safety of patient care. Therefore, reducing the nurse-to-patient ratio will enable nurses to provide quality and safe patient care, reducing patient safety issues in the healthcare organization. Additionally, an appropriate workload among nurses leads to job satisfaction, improving nurses’ performance, productivity, and work outcomes (Wang et al., 2020). Hence, increasing nursing staff in the healthcare organization would result in better performance, productivity, and work outcomes among nurses, improving the quality and safety of patient care. Furthermore, reducing nurses’ workload lowers absenteeism, burnout, and turnover rates (Wang et al., 2020). Thus, the rate of absenteeism and turnover among nurses would reduce in the healthcare organization following the contraction of agency nursing staff.

Interprofessional Collaboration required in implementing the Quality Improvement Initiative

Contracting agency nursing staff to work in the healthcare organization would involve other interprofessional team members. First, nurses would be involved in implementing this quality improvement initiative. Nurses currently working in the organization would orient the agency nursing staff, informing them about organizational policies and procedures. Additionally, current nurses would collaborate with agency nursing staff during healthcare delivery. According to Busari et al. (2017), collaboration among interdisciplinary team members during care delivery results in superior health outcomes. During the collaboration, interdisciplinary team members contribute a wide range of clinical skills, competence, and experience. Thus, the collaboration will enable nurses to provide patients with high-quality and safe nursing care. Secondly, physicians will be involved in contracting agency nursing staff in a healthcare organization. Costello et al. (2021) reported that teamwork among interdisciplinary team members during healthcare delivery leads to enhanced patient safety, improved quality of care, higher staff job satisfaction, and greater patient experience. Physicians will collaborate with agency nurses while supervising and guiding them during care delivery, resulting in high-quality and safe patient care. Additionally, the collaboration between physicians and agency nurses will result in job satisfaction among these healthcare professionals, reducing high turnover rates, which is a major issue facing the healthcare organization.

Budget Justification

 Financial resources will be required to compensate agency nursing staff. Approximately 20 agency nurses should be contracted to increase the number of nursing staff and temporarily resolve the nursing shortage, which is a significant issue facing the healthcare organization. In the United States, an agency nurse is paid $80, 000 annually. Therefore, a total of $ 1, 600, 000 would be required to compensate 20 agency nurses who will be recruited to work in the healthcare organization.

Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation

The proposed quality improvement initiative, including contracting agency nurses, will be evaluated to determine if it was successfully implemented in the healthcare organization. First, the success of the initiative will be determined based on cases of patient safety. Increasing nursing staff is anticipated to lower the nurse-to-patient ratio and nurses’ workload, allowing nurses to provide safe patient care. Thus, the decline in patient safety issues after contracting agency nurses will indicate that the initiative was successfully implemented. Secondly, the initiative will be evaluated based on turnover rates among nurses. The rate of turnover among nurses will be compared before and after contracting agency nurse staff. The decline in the rate of nurse turnover will indicate that the initiative was successfully implemented. Increasing the number of nurse staff reduced nurses’ workload, resulting in quality care and job satisfaction, motivating nurses to continue working in the organization.

 Overall, nursing shortage, increase in patient safety issues, and high turnover rate are significant concerns that are facing the healthcare organization. These issues can be addressed by contracting agency nursing staff to provide the healthcare organization with appropriate nurse staffing temporarily until the current staffing challenge is completely resolved. Increasing nurse staff in the organization will reduce nurses’ workload, improving the quality and safety of patient care. These positive health outcomes will lead to job satisfaction, reducing the turnover rate among healthcare professionals.

References

Busari, J. O., Moll, F. M., & Duits, A. J. (2017). Understanding the impact of interprofessional collaboration on the quality of care: a case report from a small-scale resource-limited health care environment. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 10, 227. Doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S140042.

Costello, M., Rusell, K., & Coventry, T. (2021). Examining the average scores of nursing teamwork subscales in an acute private medical ward. BMC nursing, 20(1), 1-10. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-021-00609-z

Faltas, S. F., & Abd-Allah, K. F. (2018). The relation be-tween Nurses’ Workload and Patients’ Safe-ty in Surgical and Neurological Intensive Care Units. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR-JNHS), 7(6), 21-33. DOI: 10.9790/1959-0706022133

Wang, H., Jin, Y., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Sang, X., & Yuan, B. (2020). Job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among primary care providers in rural China: results from structural equation modeling. BMC family practice, 21(1), 1-10.

rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative

21 points

Criteria Description

Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative

5. Excellent

21 points

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

18.69 points

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

16.59 points

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

15.75 points

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is not provided.

Target Population or Audience

18.2 points

Criteria Description

Target Population or Audience

5. Excellent

18.2 points

The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

16.2 points

The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

14.38 points

The target population or audience is provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13.65 points

The target population or audience is incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The target population or audience is not addressed.

Benefits of Quality Improvement Initiative

18.2 points

Criteria Description

Benefits of Quality Improvement Initiative

5. Excellent

18.2 points

The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meet all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

16.2 points

The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

14.38 points

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13.65 points

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are not provided.

Interprofessional Collaboration Required to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative

18.2 points

Criteria Description

Interprofessional Collaboration Required to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative

5. Excellent

18.2 points

The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is clearly discussed and meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

16.2 points

The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

14.38 points

The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13.65 points

The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is not discussed.

Cost or Budget Justification

18.2 points

Criteria Description

Cost or Budget Justification

5. Excellent

18.2 points

The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated by the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

16.2 points

The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

14.38 points

The cost or budget justification is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13.65 points

The cost or budget justification is incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The cost or budget justification is not provided.

Basis Upon Which the Program or Project Will Be Evaluated

18.2 points

Criteria Description

Basis Upon Which the Program or Project Will Be Evaluated

5. Excellent

18.2 points

The basis, upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated as indicated by the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

4. Good

16.2 points

The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is provided in detail.

3. Satisfactory

14.38 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 451 Week 3 Assignment: Executive Summary in Leadership and Management HERE

The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13.65 points

The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is incomplete, missing relevant information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is not provided.

Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

6.23 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

5.53 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.25 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Paragraph Development and Transitions

7 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Excellent

7 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Good

6.23 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

3. Satisfactory

5.53 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.25 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

7 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

7 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.23 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

5.53 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

2.8 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

2.8 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

2.49 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

2.21 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.1 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

4.2 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

4.2 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

3.74 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.32 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.15 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (750-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which the board will make its decision to fund your program or project. Include the following:

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative.
The target population or audience.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative.
The cost or budget justification.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.