NRS 455 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)
NRS 455 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5)
NRS 455 Topic 1 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 1 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Identify a cardiac or respiratory dysfunction and its cause. Outline the key steps necessary to prevent the dysfunction and improve health status.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 455 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Topic 1 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Discuss discharge resources that are available for chronic cardiorespiratory issues to support patient independence and prevent readmission. Explain how readmission affects reimbursement. What implications does readmission have on the hospital and on the patient?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 2.9.
NRS 455 Topic 1 Assignment: Case Study: Mrs. R
Assessment Description
Use the “Case Study: Mrs. R.” template to complete the assignment.
Case Study: Mrs. R. has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.5, 2.7, and 8.2.
Attachments
NRS-455-RS-T1-CaseStudyMrsR.docx
Case Study: Mrs. R. – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total130 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Clinical Manifestations of Mrs. R.
0 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are not present.
4.88 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are present but lack detail.
5.79 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed.
6.5 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are thorough.
Cardiovascular Conditions and Comorbidities
0 points
Description of four cardiovascular conditions in which the patient is at risk, as well as a discussion of comorbidities displayed by the patient, is not present.
4.88 points
Description of four cardiovascular conditions in which the patient is at risk, as well as a discussion of comorbidities displayed by the patient, is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Description of four cardiovascular conditions in which the patient is at risk, as well as a discussion of comorbidities displayed by the patient, is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Description of four cardiovascular conditions in which the patient is at risk, as well as a discussion of comorbidities displayed by the patient, is detailed.
6.5 points
Description of four cardiovascular conditions in which the patient is at risk, as well as a discussion of comorbidities displayed by the patient, is thorough.
Medical and Nursing Interventions
0 points
Explanation of what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each of the conditions is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each of the conditions is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each of the conditions is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Explanation of what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each of the conditions is detailed.
19.5 points
Explanation of what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each of the conditions is thorough.
Evaluation of Nursing Interventions at Admissions
0 points
Evaluation of whether the initial assessments and interventions at the time of admission were beneficial to the patient according to the nursing process is not present.
14.63 points
Evaluation of whether the initial assessments and interventions at the time of admission were beneficial to the patient according to the nursing process is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Evaluation of whether the initial assessments and interventions at the time of admission were beneficial to the patient according to the nursing process is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Evaluation of whether the initial assessments and interventions at the time of admission were beneficial to the patient according to the nursing process is detailed.
19.5 points
Evaluation of whether the initial assessments and interventions at the time of admission were beneficial to the patient according to the nursing process is thorough.
Changes to Initial Assessments
0 points
Explanation of any changes to the initial assessments or interventions to ensure patient independence and prevent readmission is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of any changes to the initial assessments or interventions to ensure patient independence and prevent readmission is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of any changes to the initial assessments or interventions to ensure patient independence and prevent readmission is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Explanation of any changes to the initial assessments or interventions to ensure patient independence and prevent readmission is detailed.
19.5 points
Explanation of any changes to the initial assessments or interventions to ensure patient independence and prevent readmission is thorough.
Medications and Nursing Interventions
0 points
Explanation of the seven medications listed in the scenario, including the classification, action, and rationale for each, and a discussion of four nursing interventions to prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions, is not present.
4.88 points
Explanation of the seven medications listed in the scenario, including the classification, action, and rationale for each, and a discussion of four nursing interventions to prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions, is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Explanation of the seven medications listed in the scenario, including the classification, action, and rationale for each, and a discussion of four nursing interventions to prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions, is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Explanation of the seven medications listed in the scenario, including the classification, action, and rationale for each, and a discussion of four nursing interventions to prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions, is detailed.
6.5 points
Explanation of the seven medications listed in the scenario, including the classification, action, and rationale for each, and a discussion of four nursing interventions to prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions, is thorough.
Health Promotion and Restoration Teaching Plan
0 points
Multidisciplinary health promotion and restoration teaching plan is not present.
4.88 points
Multidisciplinary health promotion and restoration teaching plan is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Multidisciplinary health promotion and restoration teaching plan for the patient, including a description of the steps needed to move the patient from acute care through the rehabilitation process, necessary modifications, and maintenance of medications, is provided but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Multidisciplinary health promotion and restoration teaching plan is provided for the patient and includes a detailed description of the steps needed to move the patient from acute care through the rehabilitation process, necessary modifications, and maintenance of medications.
6.5 points
Multidisciplinary health promotion and restoration teaching plan is provided for the patient and includes a thorough description of the steps needed to move the patient from acute care through the rehabilitation process, necessary modifications, and maintenance of medications.
Alternative Discharge Qualifications and Rehabilitation Resources
0 points
Discussion of alternative discharge options and qualifications to facilitate a smooth transition to the next level of care, including an explanation of how the rehabilitation resources promote independence and prevent readmission, is not present.
14.63 points
Discussion of alternative discharge options and qualifications to facilitate a smooth transition to the next level of care, including an explanation of how the rehabilitation resources promote independence and prevent readmission, is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Discussion of alternative discharge options and qualifications to facilitate a smooth transition to the next level of care, including an explanation of how the rehabilitation resources promote independence and prevent readmission, is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Discussion of alternative discharge options and qualifications to facilitate a smooth transition to the next level of care, including an explanation of how the rehabilitation resources promote independence and prevent readmission, is detailed.
19.5 points
Discussion of alternative discharge options and qualifications to facilitate a smooth transition to the next level of care, including an explanation of how the rehabilitation resources promote independence and prevent readmission, is thorough.
Options for Smoking Cessation
0 points
Discussion of the pathophysiological changes that come with long-term tobacco use and options for smoking cessation is not present.
4.88 points
Discussion of the pathophysiological changes that come with long-term tobacco use and options for smoking cessation is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Discussion of the pathophysiological changes that come with long-term tobacco use and options for smoking cessation is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Discussion of the pathophysiological changes that come with long-term tobacco use and options for smoking cessation is detailed.
6.5 points
Discussion of the pathophysiological changes that come with long-term tobacco use and options for smoking cessation is thorough.
COPD Triggers
0 points
Explanation of COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in readmission is not present.
4.88 points
Explanation of COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in readmission is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Explanation of COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in readmission is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Explanation of COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in readmission is detailed.
6.5 points
Explanation of COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in readmission is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.16 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.94 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.9 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.11 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.63 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 455 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 2 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Identify a common perceptual, neurological, or cognitive issue and discuss contributing factors. Outline steps for prevention or health promotion for the patient and family. Identify public health departments or local resources in your area that the patient or family could reach out to for support.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 2 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Discuss characteristic findings for a stroke and how they affect the lives of patients and their families. Discuss the nurse’s role in supporting the patient’s psychological, emotional, and spiritual needs. Provide an example integrating concepts from the “Statement on Human Flourishing” located in Topic 2 Resources.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.1, 2.2, and 9.2.
NRS 455 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study: Mrs. T.
Assessment Description
Use the “Case Study: Mrs. T.” template to complete the assignment.
Case Study: Mrs. T. has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, and 2.9.
Attachments
NRS-455-RS-T2-CaseStudyMrsT.docx’
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Case Study: Mrs. T. – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total130 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Clinical Manifestations of Mrs. T.
0 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are not present.
4.88 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are incomplete or incorrect
5.14 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are present but lack detail.
5.79 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed.
6.5 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are thorough.
Primary Diagnosis
0 points
Primary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are not present.
19.5 points
Primary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are incomplete or incorrect.
20.54 points
Primary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are present but lack detail.
23.14 points
Primary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are detailed.
26 points
Primary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are thorough.
Secondary Diagnosis
0 points
Secondary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are not present.
19.5 points
Secondary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are incomplete or incorrect.
20.54 points
Secondary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are present but lack detail.
23.14 points
Secondary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are detailed.
26 points
Secondary medical diagnosis and rationale for this diagnosis are thorough.
Nursing Diagnosis
0 points
Nursing diagnosis formulated from the medical diagnoses is not present.
19.5 points
Nursing diagnosis formulated from the medical diagnoses is incomplete or incorrect.
20.54 pointsNursing diagnosis formulated from the medical diagnoses is present but lacks detail.
23.14 points
Nursing diagnosis formulated from the medical diagnoses is detailed.
26 points
Nursing diagnosis formulated from the medical diagnoses is thorough.
Pathophysiological Changes
0 points
Description of the pathophysiological changes expected and how these will transition over the course of a week after diagnosis and initial treatment is not present.
4.88 points
Description of the pathophysiological changes expected and how these will transition over the course of a week after diagnosis and initial treatment is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Description of the pathophysiological changes expected and how these will transition over the course of a week after diagnosis and initial treatment is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Description of the pathophysiological changes expected and how these will transition over the course of a week after diagnosis and initial treatment is detailed.
6.5 points
Description of the pathophysiological changes expected and how these will transition over the course of a week after diagnosis and initial treatment is thorough.
Health Status Effect
0 points
Description of the physical, psychological, and emotional effects of the health status on the patient and the impact the health status has on the family and the ability of patient to work is not present.
4.88 points
Description of the physical, psychological, and emotional effects of the health status on the patient and the impact the health status has on the family and the ability of patient to work is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Description of the physical, psychological, and emotional effects of the health status on the patient and the impact the health status has on the family and the ability of patient to work is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Description of the physical, psychological, and emotional effects of the health status on the patient and the impact the health status has on the family and the ability of patient to work is detailed.
6.5 points
Description of the physical, psychological, and emotional effects of the health status on the patient and the impact the health status has on the family and the ability of patient to work is thorough.
Treatments and Support
0 points
Discussion of the immediate treatments and long-term support needed to return the patient to baseline activity level and an explanation of how to help the family support and cope with the diagnosis are not present.
14.63 points
Discussion of the immediate treatments and long-term support needed to return the patient to baseline activity level and an explanation of how to help the family support and cope with the diagnosis are incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Discussion of the immediate treatments and long-term support needed to return the patient to baseline activity level and an explanation of how to help the family support and cope with the diagnosis are present but lack detail.
17.36 points
Discussion of the immediate treatments and long-term support needed to return the patient to baseline activity level and an explanation of how to help the family support and cope with the diagnosis are detailed.
19.5 points
Discussion of the immediate treatments and long-term support needed to return the patient to baseline activity level and explanation of how to help the family support and cope with the diagnosis are thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.16 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.94 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.9 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.11 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.63 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 455 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 3 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Describe in detail the pathophysiological stages of kidney stones in a working 45-year-old adult male. Explain the clinical manifestations, complications, prognosis, diagnostic tests, and medical treatments and procedures involved. Discuss the nurse’s role in supporting the patient’s psychological, emotional, and spiritual needs. Provide an example integrating concepts from the “Statement of Human Flourishing,” located in Topic 3 Resources.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 3 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Describe in detail the pathophysiological explanation of pancreatitis in a working 35-year-old adult female. Explain the clinical manifestations, prognosis, diagnostic tests, and medical treatments and procedures involved. Identify the nurse’s role in promoting health awareness, resiliency and preventing medical complications.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
NRS 455 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Mr. D
Assessment Description
Use the “Case Study: Mr. D.” template and the “Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide”, located in the topic Resources, to complete the assignment.
Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
2.4: Diagnose actual or potential health problems and needs.
2.8: Promote self-care management.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.3, 2.4, 2.8, 3.1, and 3.3.
Attachments
NRS-455-RS-T3-CaseStudyMrD.docx
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Case Study: Mr. D. – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total130 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Clinical Manifestations in Mr. D.
0 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are not present.
4.88 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are present but lack detail.
5.79 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed.
6.5 points
Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are thorough.
Potential Health Risks (B)
(C2.4)
0 points
Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end-stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is not present.
14.63 points
Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is detailed.
19.5 points
Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is thorough.
Nonadherence to Diabetes Self-Management Plan (B)
(C2.8)
0 points
Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is not present.
9.75 points
Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is detailed.
13 points
Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is thorough.
Pathophysiology of Renal Dialysis and ESRD
0 points
Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is detailed.
19.5 points
Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is thorough.
Functional Health Patterns
0 points
Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is not present.
9.75 points
Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is detailed.
13 points
Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is thorough.
Nursing Management and Health Promotion
0 points
Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is not present.
9.75 points
Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is detailed.
13 points
Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is thorough.
Patient Education Plan
0 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is not present.
9.75 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is detailed.
13 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is thorough.
Community Resources
0 points
Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is not present.
4.88 points
Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is detailed.
6.5 points
Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is thorough.
Multidisciplinary Care Approach
0 points
Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is not present.
9.75 points
Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is detailed.
13 points
Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.16 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.94 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.9 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.11 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.63 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 455 Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-5) HERE
NRS 455 Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 4 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Discuss characteristic findings of an immune dysfunction. Explain what symptomology the patient would exhibit and how these symptoms may complicate daily living and relationships.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 4 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Discuss what symptoms are associated with hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis. How will the nurse differentiate these from other conditions or issues? What steps should be taken if the nurse suspects anaphylaxis?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
NRS 455 Topic 4 Assignment: Benchmark – Applying the Nursing Process to Cancer Care
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Assessment Description
The nursing process is a tool that puts knowledge into practice. By utilizing this systematic problem-solving method, nurses can determine the health care needs of an individual and provide personalized care.
Write a paper (1,250–1,500 words) on cancer and the approach to care based on the utilization of the nursing process. Include the following in your paper:
Identify a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods.
Describe the different types of diagnostic methods across the life span utilized to identify possibility of cancer. Explain the numerical method and the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging for cancer after the confirmed diagnosis.
Anticipate outcomes of care (expected, unexpected, and potentially adverse). Describe at least three complications of your selected cancer, the side effects of treatment (excluding nausea, vomiting, and hair loss), and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects, including alternative measures and pharmaceutical/herbal options.
Summarize cancer incident rates for your selected cancer. What preventative measures can be taken to reduce the yearly morbidity and mortality rate of various cancers in Americans?
Explain what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support. What ACS services could a nurse recommend for these patients and why?
How does an interdisciplinary research approach (which includes liberal arts, science studies, mathematics, social and physical sciences) build on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research?
Explain how the nursing process is utilized to provide safe and effective care for cancer patients across the life span. Your explanation should include how each of the five phases of the nursing process demonstrate the delivery of holistic and patient-focused care.
You are required to cite a minimum of four sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
1.1: Demonstrate an understanding of the discipline of nursing’s distinct perspective and where shared perspectives exist with other disciplines.
1.2: Apply theory and research-based knowledge from nursing, the arts, humanities, and other sciences.
10.2: Demonstrate a spirit of inquiry that fosters flexibility and professional maturity.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 3.1, and 10.2.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Applying the Nursing Process to Cancer Care – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total130 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Available Screening Methods
0 points
Identification of a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods is not present.
4.88 points
Identification of a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods is incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points
Identification of a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods is present but lacks detail.
5.79 points
Identification of a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods is detailed.
6.5 points
Identification of a specific type of cancer and the available screening methods is thorough.
Diagnosis and Staging of Cancer
0 points
Description of the different types of diagnostic methods utilized to identify possibility of cancer, and/or explanation of the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging cancer after confirmed diagnosis is omitted.
14.63 points
Description of the different types of diagnostic methods utilized to identify possibility of cancer, and/or explanation of the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging cancer after confirmed diagnosis is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
15.41 points
Description of the different types of diagnostic methods utilized to identify possibility of cancer and an explanation of the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging cancer after confirmed diagnosis are present.
17.36 points
Description of the different types of diagnostic methods utilized to identify possibility of cancer and an explanation of the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging cancer after confirmed diagnosis are detailed.
19.5 points
Description of the different types of diagnostic methods utilized to identify possibility of cancer and an explanation of the tumor, node, metastasized (TNM) method of staging cancer after confirmed diagnosis are thorough.
Complications, Side Effects, and Methods to Lessen Effects
0 points
Description of at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects is not complete.
9.75 points
Description of at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Description of at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Description of at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects is detailed.
13 points
Description of at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects is thorough.
Incidence Rates and Preventative Measures
0 points
Discussion of incidence rates for the selected cancer and preventative measures that can be taken to reduce yearly morbidity and mortality rates of various cancers in Americans is thorough.
9.75 points
Discussion of incidence rates for the selected cancer and preventative measures that can be taken to reduce yearly morbidity and mortality rates of various cancers in Americans is thorough.
10.27 points
Discussion of incidence rates for the selected cancer and preventative measures that can be taken to reduce yearly morbidity and mortality rates of various cancers in Americans is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Discussion of incidence rates for the selected cancer and preventative measures that can be taken to reduce yearly morbidity and mortality rates of various cancers in Americans is detailed.
13 points
Discussion of incidence rates for the selected cancer and preventative measures that can be taken to reduce yearly morbidity and mortality rates of various cancers in Americans is thorough.
American Cancer Society (ACS) (B)
(C1.1, C1.2)
0 points
Explanation of what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support, including what ACS services a nurse could recommend for patients and why, is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support, including what ACS services a nurse could recommend for patients and why, is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support, including what ACS services a nurse could recommend for patients and why, is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Explanation of what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support, including what ACS services a nurse could recommend for patients and why, is detailed.
19.5 points
Explanation of what the American Cancer Society (ACS) might provide for education and support, including what ACS services a nurse could recommend for patients and why, is thorough.
Interdisciplinary Research Approach (B)
(C1.2)
0 points
Explanation of how an interdisciplinary research approach builds on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of how an interdisciplinary research approach builds on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of how an interdisciplinary research approach builds on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Explanation of how an interdisciplinary research approach builds on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research is detailed.
19.5 points
Explanation of how an interdisciplinary research approach builds on the foundational nursing knowledge related to cancer research is thorough.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
6.82 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
7.19 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
8.1 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
9.1 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
6.82 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
7.19 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
8.1 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
9.1 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
5.85 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
6.16 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
6.94 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
7.8 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.16 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.94 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.9 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.11 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.63 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 410 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussions
Topic 5 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Choose one multisystem dysfunction. Describe pathophysiological changes, abnormal findings, and symptoms of the chosen dysfunction. How does it affect the patient’s activities of daily living?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 5 DQ 2
Assessment Description
Explain the modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for osteoporosis. How can a nurse support the patient in managing the health condition and restore the patient to optimal health?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
NRS 410V Week 5 CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes
Assessment Description
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
Collaborate with your group from Topic 2 to develop a presentation using your instructor-approved article on a specific intervention or new treatment tool for the management of diabetes in the aging/elderly population or children. The article must be published within the last 5 years and relevant to nursing practice.
Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint presentation (not including the title and references slides) on the study’s findings and how they can be used by nurses as an intervention. Include speaker notes for each slide and additional slides for the title page and references.
Include the following:
Describe, using the PICO(T) question format, the specific population and intervention or treatment tool used in the article.
Summarize the PICO(T) outcome evaluated by your selected article. The research presented must include pathophysiological findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to nursing practice.
Provide a description of how the treatment tool or intervention can be integrated into nursing practice. Provide evidence to support your discussion. Reflect how the treatment tool or intervention will affect nursing practice and the disease process.
Explain why psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for the patient population which your article reviews. Describe how support can be offered in these respective areas as part of a plan of care for the patient. Provide examples.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 2.3, 2.5, 4.1, and 4.2.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 2 – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total130 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Article
0 points
Current article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is not present.
9.75 points
Current article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Current article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is present lacks detail.
11.57 points
Current article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is detailed.
13 points
Current article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is thorough and uses the PICOT method.
Intervention or Treatment Tool
0 points
Description of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is not present.
14.63 points
Description of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Description of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points
Description of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is detailed.
19.5 points
Description of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is thorough.
Summary of Article
0 points
Summary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is not present.
9.75 points
Summary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points
Summary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points
Summary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is detailed.
13 points
Summary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is thorough.
Treatment Tool or Intervention Integration
0 points
Description of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is not present.
19.5 points
Description of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is incomplete or incorrect.
20.54 points
Description of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is present but lacks detail.
23.14 points
Description of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is detailed.
26 points
Description of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is thorough.
Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects
0 points
Explanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is not present.
14.63 points
Explanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points
Explanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is present but lacks detail or examples.
17.36 points
Explanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is detailed and provides examples.
19.5 points
Explanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is thorough and provides examples.
Presentation of Content
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
9.75 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
10.27 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
11.57 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
13 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
4.88 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
5.14 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
5.79 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
6.5 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
4.88 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
5.14 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
5.79 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
6.5 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.14 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
5.79 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
6.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.88 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.14 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.79 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
6.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.