NRS 460 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit

NRS 460 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit

NRS 460 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit

Assessment Description

Use the “Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit” template to complete the assignment.

This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-460 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 460 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

RN-BSN

2.6: Demonstrate accountability for care delivery.

2.7: Evaluate outcomes of care.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, and 3.3.

Attachments

NRS-460-RS-T3-BenchmarkCaseStudy-TimothySmith-

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Plan of Care: Evaluate Plan of Care (B) (B)

(C2.7)

0 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is not present.

16.88 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is present but lacks detail.
20.03 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is detailed.
22.5 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is thorough.

Plan of Care: Protocol (B) (B)

(C2.6)
0 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is not present.

16.88 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is present but lacks detail.

20.03 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is detailed.
22.5 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is thorough.

Recovery and Response to Treatment

0 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is not present.
11.25 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is present but lacks detail.

13.35 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is detailed.

15 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is thorough.

Complications

0 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is not present.

11.25 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 460 Topic 3 Assignment: Benchmark – Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit HERE

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: History of Smoking

0 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is not present.

11.25 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is present but lacks detail.

13.35 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is detailed.
15 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: Smoking Cessation

0 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is not present.

11.25 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is incomplete or incorrect.

11.85 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: Balancing Care
0 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is not present.
11.25 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is incomplete or incorrect.

11.85 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is thorough.

Psychosocial and Spiritual Considerations

0 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is not present.
5.63 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is incomplete or incorrect.

5.93 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is present but lacks detail.

6.68 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is detailed.
7.5 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is thorough.

Care Planning and Insurance

0 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is not present.
5.63 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is incomplete or incorrect.
5.93 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is present but lacks detail.

6.68 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is detailed.
7.5 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

5.93 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.