NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit

Assignment: Benchmark-Case Study: Timothy Smith-Medical Surgical Unit

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Assessment Description

Use the “Case Study: Timothy Smith – Medical Surgical Unit” template to complete the assignment.

This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-460 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT  HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

RN-BSN

2.6: Demonstrate accountability for care delivery.

2.7: Evaluate outcomes of care.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, and 3.3.

Attachments

NRS-460-RS-T3-BenchmarkCaseStudy-TimothySmith-

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Rubric

Total150 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Plan of Care: Evaluate Plan of Care (B) (B)

(C2.7)

0 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is not present.

16.88 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is present but lacks detail.
20.03 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is detailed.
22.5 points

Discussion of health goals for the patient, including recommendations for modifying the patient’s plan of care to meet his needs, is thorough.

Plan of Care: Protocol (B) (B)

(C2.6)
0 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is not present.

16.88 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is present but lacks detail.

20.03 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is detailed.
22.5 points

Explanation of the protocol used to implement an individualized plan of care updates based on recommendations is thorough.

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Recovery and Response to Treatment

0 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is not present.
11.25 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is present but lacks detail.

13.35 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is detailed.

15 points

Discussion of the impact the patient’s history of PTSD and depression might have on his recovery and response to treatment is thorough.

Complications

0 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is not present.

11.25 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of the overall complications that may affect the patient’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being, including an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: History of Smoking

0 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is not present.

11.25 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is incomplete or incorrect.
11.85 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is present but lacks detail.

13.35 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is detailed.
15 points

Explanation of how the patient’s history of smoking might hinder the proper healing of his broken bones is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: Smoking Cessation

0 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is not present.

11.25 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is incomplete or incorrect.

11.85 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of how to integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into the patient’s recovery team, including how his past usage of recreational drugs impacts his pain management, is thorough.

Smoking and Drug Use: Balancing Care
0 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is not present.
11.25 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is incomplete or incorrect.

11.85 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is present but lacks detail.
13.35 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is detailed.
15 points

Discussion of how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for the patient while respecting his self-determination in his health care decisions is thorough.

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Psychosocial and Spiritual Considerations

0 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is not present.
5.63 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is incomplete or incorrect.

5.93 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is present but lacks detail.

6.68 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is detailed.
7.5 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is thorough.

Care Planning and Insurance

0 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is not present.
5.63 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is incomplete or incorrect.
5.93 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is present but lacks detail.

6.68 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is detailed.
7.5 points

Explanation of who to involve if a patient is uninsured and how this would impact the socioeconomic aspect care planning moving forward is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

5.93 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Sample

PART II: Critical Thinking Activity

Use the findings from your evaluation to complete the following:

Plan of Care When assuming care of this patient, you were told that the plan for Mr. Smith is to be discharged home tomorrow. This was not the plan when you took care of Mr. Smith yesterday.
Part 1: Evaluate Outcomes of Care 1. Evaluate Mr. Smith’s readiness for discharge based on the information provided in the case study. Based on your findings, evaluate health goals for this patient. Discuss how you would modify the plan of care. Your response should be a minimum of 200 words. NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit	Adequate discharge planning is important in Mr. Smith’s case study. The planning is an interdisciplinary process that promotes successful patient transition from the hospital to post-hospital care. Successful discharge planning also influences other outcomes such as recovery, readmission rate, patient satisfaction, and complication rates. I believe that Mr. Smith is not ready for discharge. Dimensions of readiness for discharge such as physical, psychological, adequate support, and social and organizational determinants have not been met. For example, satisfactory physical functioning has not been established in Mr. Smith’s case. He has not been educated and shown how to use assistive devices, which will improve his functioning post-discharge. The healthcare team has not weaned him off oxygen. They have not established care teams that will ensure his follow-up post-discharge. Mr. Smith’s family has not been adequately involved in the discharge planning process. The nurse has also not established support systems and care options that would facilitate Mr. Smith’s recovery. Mr. Smith’s psychosocial needs have also not been met. The psychiatrist established mental health problems, which should be managed before his discharge (Gledhill et al., 2021). Therefore, his readiness for discharge has not been established. Mr. Smith’s health goals are varied. One of them is to ensure that he is competent in the use of assistive devices. The other goal is to ensure that Mr. Smith is free from ventilator support. The third goal is to ensure that adequate psychosocial support is available for Mr. Smith following his hospital discharge. The other goal is to ensure Mr. Smith’s smooth transition from hospital to post-hospital care. I would modify the discharge plan by involving an interdisciplinary team. I will seek their input in assessing if Mr. Smith meets the requirements for hospital discharge. I will also collaborate with the interdisciplinary team in developing appropriate interventions to achieve pre-hospital discharge goals (Weiss et al., 2020). I will involve Mr. Smith’s family in the discharge planning process.
2. Based on your assessment, how would you recommend modifying the plan of care to meet Mr. Smith’s needs? Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	One of the modifications that I would recommend for Mr. Smith’s needs is ensuring that physical therapy is involved in the discharge planning process. The physical therapist should assess Mr. Smith’s ability to use assistive devices such as crutches before discharge. The second recommendation would be to involve Mr. Smith’s mother in the discharge planning process. Mr. Smith’s mother will help determine adequate support available for Mr. Smith and alternative discharge pathways that might be considered. Thirdly, I would recommend a psychiatrist to be involved in the discharge planning. The psychiatrist will provide an accurate assessment of Mr. Smith’s psychological health and his acceptance level. The psychiatrist will also help determine the care pathways that would be incorporated into the discharge plan for optimum care outcomes. The other recommendation would be adopting a step-down approach to Mr. Smith’s respiratory support. Mr. Smith is currently on 2L oxygen via a nasal cannula. The oxygen should be decreased gradually while his respiratory status is monitored to prevent complications post-discharge (Sakkers et al., 2021). These considerations would ensure a smooth transition from hospital to post-hospital care.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Part 2: Protocol What protocol would you use to implement your recommendations for Mr. Smith’s updated plan of care? Your response should be a minimum of 200 words.	I would use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model to implement my recommendations. The PDSA is a framework used in healthcare to make positive changes in healthcare systems and processes. The framework promotes rapid improvements in healthcare systems. It recognizes outcome improvements through small and frequent changes instead of big moves. I will incorporate interdisciplinary collaboration when implementing changes using the PDSA framework. Specifically, I will guide the interdisciplinary team to answer questions related to the goal of the changes, assessing if the goals have been achieved, and the things that must be done to achieve the goals. We will utilize the model by engaging in several steps. The first one would be assessing the scope and nature of the problem. The nature and scope of the problem would be Mr. Smith’s lack of readiness for hospital discharge. As a result, the interdisciplinary team will collaborate in assessing Mr. Smith’s needs and changes that must be implemented to ensure readiness for hospital discharge. The interdisciplinary team should then plan specific strategies that must be implemented, team members to be involved, and measures to be used to determine if the goals have been achieved or not. The change strategies before hospital discharge will then be implemented, data collected, and be used to indicate readiness for hospital discharge (Moullin et al., 2020). The PDSA framework will promote systematic improvements in the approaches utilized in determining the readiness for the discharge of patients in the facility.
Recovery and Response to Treatment Consider Mr. Smith’s history of PTSD and depression.
Discuss the impact his PTSD and depression history might have on his recovery and response to treatment. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	PTSD and depression might affect Mr. Smith’s recovery and response to treatment. Patients with PTSD and depression have a depressed mood. They might also have other symptoms such as lack of motivation and energy, helplessness, guilt, and lack of interest and pleasure. These symptoms might affect Mr. Smith’s treatment adherence and, hence, outcomes. Patients with major depression might also have suicidal thoughts, attempts, or plans. Mr. Smith suffered multiple injuries from the accident, which predisposed him to worsening depression. He is also likely to suffer poor quality of life, decreased functioning, and dependence on others. The changes in his functioning and quality of life are likely to result in poor treatment adherence and adverse events such as suicidal attempts, which would affect recovery and treatment. Studies have shown the increased risk of complications such as surgical site infections, wound complications, and non-union, emergency department visits among patients with comorbid depression post-hip fracture surgery (Broggi et al., 2021). Therefore, PTSD and depression might affect negatively Mrs. Smith’s recovery and treatment response.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Complications Consider Mr. Smith’s history of PTSD and depression in addressing the following questions.
Discuss the overall complications that may affect Mr. Smith’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	One of the complications that would affect Mr. Smith’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being is decreased functioning. Mr. Smith’s functioning in areas such as social, occupational, and interpersonal relationships will decline post-hospital discharge. These changes will translate into a poor quality of life, which would worsen his major depression and PTSD symptoms. The other complication that might affect Mr. Smith’s motivation, compliance, and psychological well-being is the lack of social support. Mr. Smith requires adequate support from his family, friends, and members of the society. The support includes physical, social, emotional, and spiritual support. Inadequate social and family support will worsen his mental health and well-being. Isolation will also affect his motivation to comply with the prescribed treatments, hence, poor outcomes. The other complication that might affect outcomes in Mr. Smith’s treatment is inadequate medical management and provision of the desired rehabilitation services. Inadequate medical management would increase the risk of complications such as poor wound healing and sepsis (Broggi et al., 2021). Inadequate rehabilitation services will affect Mr. Smith’s return to baseline functioning.
Put together an interdisciplinary team to support all areas of his recovery, including mental health support. Provide a rationale for your response by referencing his assessment findings. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	An interdisciplinary team should be involved in Mr. Smith’s care. The team members should comprise registered nurses, physicians, counselors, psychiatrists, physical therapists, wound care specialists, orthopedics specialists, and respiratory therapists. Registered nurses will be involved in all aspects of Mr. Smith’s care such as care coordination, health education, follow-up, assessment of treatment compliance, monitoring, and evaluating treatment outcomes and needs. A psychiatrist and counselor will ensure the treatment of major depression and PTSD and provide psychotherapy for effective coping with complex health needs. Physicians will assess, plan, monitor, evaluate, and recommend any new treatments that might be required in Mr. Smith’s care. They will collaborate with other members of the interdisciplinary team to ensure patient-centered care. A physical therapist will ensure that Mr. Smith can use assistive devices and help him return to his baseline functioning. A wound care nurse is needed to provide the required wound cleaning and dressing and recommend additional treatments to facilitate recovery (Sakkers et al., 2021). Orthopedic specialists will assess his recovery following ORIF surgery. A respiratory therapist will assess Mr. Smith’s respiratory status and recommend appropriate treatments to optimize his functioning and health.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Smoking and Drug Use Consider Mr. Smith’s history of smoking and recreational drug use.
History of Smoking How might his history of smoking impact the healing of the bones? Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	Smoking affects bone healing. Firstly, smoking affects bone mineral density. It hinders the deposition and absorption of calcium in the bones. Smoking also lowers the levels of available vitamin D. Reduced vitamin D levels lower the absorption of calcium into the bones via the gastrointestinal system. Smoking also changes the levels of hormones needed for bone strength. This includes estrogen levels, which predispose patients to fractures. Smoking also reduces body mass among smokers. This affects calcium and vitamin D bioavailability. Smokers who experience fractures also experience slower wound healing and bone nonunion compared to non-smokers. In some cases, smoking might contribute to subsequent risks or occurrences of bone fractures. This is because of continued bone di-mineralization with smoking, which predisposes smokers to recurrent bone fractures (Hernigou & Schuind, 2019). Evidence shows that most smokers who experience fractures have slowed bone healing due to delayed union, non-union, and the development of bone complications such as osteomyelitis. Smoking also affects bone stability. It impairs stability factors such as the production of growth factors, osteogenic cells, and osteoconductive scaffold, which determine bone health (Xu et al., 2021).
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit  Cessation of Smoking 1. Discuss how you would integrate smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts into Mr. Smith’s recovery team. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	Smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts should be part of the interprofessional teams involved in Mr. Smith’s recovery. Smoking cessation and rehabilitation experts should collaborate with psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners in helping Mr. Smith overcome his smoking problem. The experts should educate Mr. Smith about the health effects of smoking and its impact on bone healing and the available smoking cessation options he might consider. The experts should also educate Mr. Smith about the available social support groups for smoking cessation. Support groups would help Mr. Smith identify effective strategies for overcoming smoking. The psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner and the smoking cessation experts would collaborate in developing appropriate care plans that would facilitate smoking cessation. For example, it might be necessary to incorporate other treatments such as psychotherapy into the plan to prevent relapse in smoking cessation. Other healthcare providers, including physicians, must consider the prescribed treatments for smoking cessation to prevent drug interactions and adverse outcomes.
2. How might Mr. Smith’s past usage of recreational drugs impact his pain management? Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	Previous recreational drug use will affect Mr. Smith’s pain management. Mr. Smith’s previous recreational drug use must be considered when prescribing him pain medications. This is because issues such as addiction increase opioid tolerance. Patients with a history of addiction might need a high opioid dose for them to control their pain. Increased demand for opioid doses predisposes Mr. Smith to safety and quality concerns in his care. This is because it might be difficult for the healthcare provider to determine if the increased demand for opioid dosage is due to a new substance abuse problem or disease progression. Therefore, healthcare providers should mitigate these risks by prescribing a specific amount of opioids with strict dosage instructions (Urits et al., 2021). They should also establish a contract with Mr. Smith on issues related to inappropriate opioid use.
Balancing Discuss how the nurse would balance promoting smoking cessation for Mr. Smith while respecting his self-determination in his healthcare decisions. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	The nurse should balance promoting smoking cessation for Mr. Smith while respecting self-determination in his healthcare decisions. One of the strategies the nurse can adopt to achieve this objective is to ensure that he establishes rapport and trust with Mr. Smith. The nurse should be non-judgmental and strive to create an honest relationship with Mr. Smith. Trust and honesty will make Mr. Smith feel supported and be willing to discuss his concerns and options that might be considered for his problems. The other strategy is providing patient-centered health education. The nurse should provide Mr. Smith with evidence-based information about the risks of smoking on his health and recovery and strategies that can be adopted to overcome his addiction. Health education would increase his awareness level and stimulate motivation for behavioral change. The nurse should also collaborate with Mr. Smith to identify barriers to smoking cessation. They should also identify patient-specific strategies that can facilitate incremental success in smoking cessation (Abadi et al., 2020; Linnet Olesen & Jørgensen, 2023). The use of these strategies would ensure patient-centered approaches that promote sustainable change in addressing Mr. Smith’s smoking problem.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Psychosocial and Spiritual Considerations Providing holistic nursing care for patients with complex conditions requires that the nurse takes into account the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs.
Given the patient’s current situation, discuss ways in which the nurse can take into account and address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs. Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	The nurse should address Mr. Smith’s psychosocial and spiritual needs. The nurse should first assess Mr. Smith’s spiritual and psychosocial issues to identify his needs. He should undertake a comprehensive assessment by focusing on areas such as cultural and spiritual values, beliefs, and preferences, and the available social support systems for Mr. Smith. The nurse should use the assessment data to develop a care plan that addresses Mr. Smith’s prioritized and potential needs. The other strategy to address Mr. Smith’s psychosocial needs is the use of effective communication skills. The nurse should incorporate communication skills such as active listening, empathy, and encouraging Mr. Smith’s expression of his concerns. Effective communication skills make Mr. Smith feel valued and enable the nurse to create an effective caring environment that fosters active collaboration. The nurse must also ensure that the developed care plans align with Mr. Smith’s spiritual and cultural values (Bhuiyan et al., 2022). For example, strategies such as involving the chaplain in meeting his needs can be considered to meet Mr. Smith’s spiritual needs.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit Care Planning and Insurance Nurses have to have an awareness of the socioeconomic impact of care delivery, especially when planning care for patients with complex needs.
Who would you need to involve if you discover that the patient is uninsured? Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	Health insurance is important for increased access to healthcare that Mr. Smith needs. Insurance will help Mr. Smith and his family to overcome the financial hardships that would be encountered in managing his complex health needs. I would involve some experts should I discover that Mr. Smith does not have insurance. Firstly, I will involve the case manager or social worker in the issue. A social worker or case manager can help assess Mr. Smith’s economic status and recommend appropriate health insurance to help him overcome barriers to healthcare. This will include determining Mr. Smith’s eligibility for insurance such as Medicaid and private insurance should he afford them. The hospital administration should also be involved if Mr. Smith does not have insurance. The administration will assess the potential social determinants of health such as income and employment status, which might be contributing to Mr. Smith’s lack of insurance. The hospital will use Mr. Smith’s data to determine the determinants of healthcare access and strategies to overcome them in the communities it serves. Lastly, local community organizations might be involved in addressing Mr. Smith’s non-insurance status. Local organizations such as religious institutions and non-governmental organizations might provide Mr. Smith with the support he needs with his insurance problems. They might pay for his medical bills and support his adjustment to the new needs following the accident.
How would this impact the socioeconomic aspect of Mr. Smith’s care plan moving forward? Your response should be a minimum of 150 words.	A lack of medical insurance affects Mr. Smith’s care planning moving forward. Medical insurance such as Medicaid and Medicare eliminate barriers to healthcare such as costs for vulnerable populations. These insurances will ensure that Mr. Smith accesses the healthcare services he needs for his continued management of complex health needs. However, a lack of medical insurance will imply that Mr. Smith and his family will incur high costs in accessing the care he needs. His out-of-pocket spending for emergency department visits, hospitalization, and medication refills will be significantly high. Therefore, Mr. Smith and his family are likely to suffer from a high disease burden. A lack of insurance will also affect the timeliness of healthcare services for Mr. Smith. This can be seen from increased incidences of missed or delayed care being offered to Mr. Smith. Missed and delays in healthcare access will affect other aspects of Mr. Smith’s care such as recovery and assessment of treatment response. The nurse and other members of the interprofessional team will experience problems in coordinating his care. This is because of the fragmentation of the different aspects of care that Mr. Smith needs for his optimum recovery and functioning (Wei et al., 2020). Therefore, a lack of medical insurance will affect Mr. Smith’s care planning moving forward.
NRS 460 Topic 3 Benchmark-Case Study: Medical Surgical Unit References Abadi, T. S. H., Nia, M. N., & Mazlom, S. R. (2020). Effect of self-determination theory-based discharge program on lifestyle and readmission of patients with heart failure: A clinical trial. Evidence Based Care Journal, 10(1), Article 1. Bhuiyan, N., McNeill, L. H., Bopp, M., Downs, D. S., & Mama, S. K. (2022). Fostering spirituality and psychosocial health through mind-body practices in underserved populations. Integrative Medicine Research, 11(1), 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100755 Broggi, M. S., Oladeji, P. O., Tahmid, S., Hernandez-Irizarry, R., & Allen, J. (2021). Depressive Disorders Lead to Increased Complications After Geriatric Hip Fractures. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, 12, 21514593211016252. https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593211016252 Gledhill, K., Hanna, L., Nicks, R., & Lannin, N. A. (2021). Defining discharge-readiness from subacute care from all stakeholders’ perspectives: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(22), 3127–3134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1733107 Hernigou, J., & Schuind, F. (2019). Tobacco and bone fractures. Bone & Joint Research, 8(6), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0344.R1 Linnet Olesen, M., & Jørgensen, R. (2023). Impact of the person-centred intervention guided self-determination across healthcare settings—An integrated review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 37(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13138 Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Albers, B., Nilsen, P., Broder-Fingert, S., Mukasa, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7 Sakkers, R. J., Montpetit, K., Tsimicalis, A., Wirth, T., Verhoef, M., Hamdy, R., Ouellet, J. A., Castelein, R. M., Damas, C., Janus, G. J., Nijhuis, W. H., Panzeri, L., Paveri, S., Mekking, D., Thorstad, K., & Kruse, R. W. (2021). A roadmap to surgery in osteogenesis imperfecta: Results of an international collaboration of patient organizations and interdisciplinary care teams. Acta Orthopaedica, 92(5), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1941628 Urits, I., Charipova, K., Gress, K., Li, N., Berger, A. A., Cornett, E. M., Kassem, H., Ngo, A. L., Kaye, A. D., & Viswanath, O. (2021). Adverse Effects of Recreational and Medical Cannabis. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 51(1), 94. Wei, W., Ulyte, A., Gruebner, O., von Wyl, V., Dressel, H., Brüngger, B., Blozik, E., Bähler, C., Braun, J., & Schwenkglenks, M. (2020). Degree of regional variation and effects of health insurance-related factors on the utilization of 24 diverse healthcare services—A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1091. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05930-y Weiss, M. E., Lerret, S. M., Sawin, K. J., & Schiffman, R. F. (2020). Parent Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale: Psychometrics and Association With Postdischarge Outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 34(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2019.06.011 Xu, B., Anderson, D. B., Park, E.-S., Chen, L., & Lee, J. H. (2021). The influence of smoking and alcohol on bone healing: Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pathological fractures. EClinicalMedicine, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101179