NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2

Discussion: Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research. Provide an example of a peer-reviewed research article involving human subjects and addressing a nursing practice issue.

NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2 Assessment Description

Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research. Provide an example of a peer-reviewed research article involving human subjects and addressing a nursing practice issue. Discuss the ethical considerations the researchers considered when conducting the study.

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2 HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2 Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN DQ Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2 Sample

The institutional review board (IRB) plays a critical role in research that involves human subjects or participants. The Institutional Review Board is an administrative entity created to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects recruited to participate in research activities carried out based on the rules of the institution with which it is associated (Serpico et al., 2022). The IRB process is aimed at ensuring that study participants are safe and the research leads to high-quality evidence for application in clinical settings and health populations. The primary role of IRB is to review, before its initiation, all research involving human participants. The IRB protects the welfare, rights, and privacy of human subjects. For instance, it ensures that research subjects have informed consent (Lynch et al., 2020). The IRB has the authority to approve, exempt, disapprove, monitor and evaluate, and demand changes in all research activities that fall within its jurisdictions based on set regulations at state and federal levels and institutional policy. The IRB reviews research proposals to ensure ethical considerations are upheld, ascertain possible benefits outweigh the potential risks to participants, and ascertain informed consent procedures are sufficient. NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2

An example of a peer-reviewed research article involving human participants and discussing a nursing issue is by O’Brien (2020) titled, “Decreasing Falls Amongst Elderly.” In the study, the researcher involved 26 nurses’ aides who were trained for over 10 weeks to perform an evidence-based intervention: purposeful hourly rounding based on 4 Ps. The researcher prioritized ethical considerations are required by IRB. These included getting informed consent from the nurses, confidentiality, minimizing harm, and ensuring that they benefited from the EBP intervention. For instance, the researcher did not reveal the identity of the participants while the essence of the training was to equip nurses with four interventions to reduce and prevent patient falls. These included assessing pain, personal needs, appropriate positioning, and placement.

NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2 References

Lynch, H. F., & Rosenfeld, S. (2020). Institutional review board quality, private equity, and

promoting ethical human subjects research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(7), 558-562. DOI: 10.7326/M20-1674.

O’Brien, J. (2020). Decreasing Falls Amongst Elderly. International Journal of

Nursing and Health Care Research, 3:1201. DOI: 10.29011/2688-9501.101201

Serpico, K., Rahimzadeh, V., Gelinas, L., Hartsmith, L., Lynch, H. F., & Anderson, E. E. (2022).

Institutional review board use of outside experts: A national survey. AJOB empirical bioethics, 13(4), 251-262. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090459. NRS 465 Topic 3 DQ 2