NRS 465 Week 4 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 465 Week 4 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 465 Week 4 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

Assessment Description

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project

This assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 465 Week 4 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (published within the past 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NRS-465-T4-RS-Literature Evaluation Table.docx

Literature Evaluation Table – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total50 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Finalized PICOT Question

Finalize a PICOT question.
0 points

A finalized PICOT question is missing.

1.88 points

A finalized PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.
1.98 points

A finalized PICOT question is present but lacks detail.

2.23 points

A finalized PICOT question is mostly detailed.
2.5 points

A finalized PICOT question is thorough and accurate.

Literature Search Strategy Employed

Describe the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles.
0 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is missing.
2.63 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is present but lacks detail.

3.12 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is mostly detailed.

3.5 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is thorough and accurate.

APA References

Eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format and include a working link or GCU permalink.

0 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is missing.

2.63 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is present but lacks detail.

3.12 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is mostly detailed.

3.5 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is thorough and detailed.

Purpose/Aim of Study

Describe the purpose or aim of each study.
0 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is missing.
2.63 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

2.77 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is present but lacks detail.

3.12 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is mostly detailed.
3.5 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is thorough and detailed.

Research questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

Identify the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study.
0 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is missing.

2.63 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is present but lacks detail.
3.12 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is mostly detailed.
3.5 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is thorough and detailed.

Design

Explain the type of qualitative study design.
0 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is missing.
2.63 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is present but lacks detail.
3.12 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is mostly detailed.
3.5 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is thorough and detailed.

Setting

Identify where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.).

0 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is missing.

2.63 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is present, but lacks detail.
3.12 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is mostly detailed.

3.5 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is thorough and detailed.

Sample

Explain the number and characteristics of participants in the study.
0 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is missing.
2.63 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is inaccurate or incomplete.
2.77 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is present but lacks detail.
3.12 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is mostly detailed.

3.5 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is thorough and detailed.

Methods

Describe the interventions and instruments of each study.
0 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is missing.
2.63 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

2.77 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is present but lacks detail.
3.12 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is mostly detailed.
3.5 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is thorough and detailed.

Analysis

Explain how the data collected from each study was analyzed.

0 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is missing.

3.38 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.56 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is present but lacks detail.
4.01 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is mostly detailed.
4.5 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is thorough and detailed.

Outcomes/Key Findings

Describe the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results).

0 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results) is missing.

3.75 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is present, but lacks detail.
4.45 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is mostly detailed.
5 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is thorough and detailed.

Recommendations

Describe the recommendations from each study.
0 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is missing.
3.75 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

3.95 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is mostly detailed.
5 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is thorough and detailed.

Connection to PICOT Question and Capstone Change Project

Explain how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project.

0 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is missing.

3.75 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is mostly detailed.

5 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is thorough and detailed.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.