NRS 465 Week 8 Assignment: Develop a 2,500-3,000-word written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

NRS 465 Week 8 Assignment: Develop a 2,500-3,000-word written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

NRS 465 Week 8 Assignment: Develop a 2,500-3,000-word written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

Assessment Description

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 2,500-3,000-word written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Background of clinical problem

Clinical problem statement (Topic 3 assignment)

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system (Topic 2 assignment)

PICOT question (Topic 3 assignment)

Literature search strategy employed (Topic 4 assignment)

Synthesis of literature review (Topic 6 assignment)

Applicable change or nursing theory utilized (Topic 4 DQ 2)

Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures (Topic 5 assignment)

Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention (Topic 6 assignment)

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (Topic 5 DQ 2 and any other barriers that have not yet been considered)

Appendix section: Update the Capstone Change Project Evaluation plan developed in Topic 7 as needed. Include it as Appendix A. Additional items developed for your capstone project (i.e., patient or staff education materials, etc.) can also be attached but are optional.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Capstone Project assignments submitted throughout the course and referenced above. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

1.3: Demonstrate clinical judgment founded on a broad knowledge base.

2.5: Develop a plan of care.

4.2: Integrate best evidence into nursing practice.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.3, 2.5, 3.3, 3.5, 4.2, 10.2, 10.3

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total160 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Revision Evident

Revisions are incorporated as directed by instructor.
0 points

Revision is omitted.
6 points

Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear.
6.32 points

Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies.

7.12 points

The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.

8 points

All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.

Background

Include the background of the clinical problem.
0 points

The background of the clinical problem is missing.

6 points

The background of the clinical problem is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

The background of the clinical problem is present but lacks detail.

7.12 points

The background of the clinical problem is mostly detailed.
8 points

The background of the clinical problem is thorough and accurate.

Clinical Problem Statement (B)

Include the clinical problem statement. (C4.2)

0 points

The clinical problem statement is missing.
6 points

The clinical problem statement is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

The clinical problem statement is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

The clinical problem statement is mostly detailed.
8 points

The clinical problem statement is thorough and accurate.

Purpose

Explain the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
0 points

An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is missing.
6 points

An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is mostly detailed.
8 points

An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is thorough and accurate.

PICOT Question

Provide the PICOT question and details.
0 points

PICOT question is missing.
6 points

PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

PICOT question is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

PICOT question is mostly detailed.
8 points

PICOT question is thorough and accurate.

Literature Search Strategy

Explain the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project.
0 points

An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project is missing.

6 points

An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project is mostly detailed.
8 points

An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student’s project is thorough and accurate.

Synthesis of Literature Review

Describe the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project.
0 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is missing.
6 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is inaccurate or incomplete.
6.32 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is mostly detailed.

8 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is thorough and accurate.

Applicable Change or Nursing Theory (B)

Describe the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project. (C1.3)
0 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is missing.
6 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is inaccurate or incomplete.

6.32 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is present but lacks detail.

7.12 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is mostly detailed.

8 points

A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student’s project is thorough and accurate.

Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures

Describe the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.

0 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is missing.
12 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is inaccurate or incomplete.
12.64 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is present but lacks detail.
14.24 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is mostly detailed.
16 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is thorough and accurate.

Evaluation Nursing Intervention (B)

Outline plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention. (C2.5)
0 points

An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is missing.
12 points

An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is inaccurate or incomplete.
12.64 points

An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is present but lacks detail.

14.24 points

An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is mostly detailed.
16 points

An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is thorough and accurate.

Potential Barriers

Identify potential barriers to plan implementation, and discuss how these could be overcome.
0 points

An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be overcome are missing.

6 points

An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be overcome are inaccurate or incomplete.

6.32 points

An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be overcome are present but lack detail.
7.12 points

An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be overcome are mostly detailed.

8 points

An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be overcome are thorough and accurate.

Appendix

Appendix

0 points

Appendix is missing.
6 points

Appendix is inaccurate or incomplete.

6.32 points

Appendix is present but lacks detail.

7.12 points

Appendix is mostly detailed.
8 points

Appendix is thorough and accurate.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
8.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

8.85 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
9.97 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

11.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
8.4 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
8.85 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
9.97 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
11.2 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

7.2 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

7.58 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
8.54 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
9.6 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
7.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
7.58 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

8.54 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
9.6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.06 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

5.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6.4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.