NRS 493 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives

NRS 493 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives

NRS 493 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives

Assessment Description

Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for your capstone change project. Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention. Below each objective, provide a one or two sentence rationale.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

After writing your objectives, provide a rationale for how your proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

2.5: Advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total5 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Objectives

Objectives

0 points

A list of objectives for the proposed intervention is omitted.
0.75 points

Fewer than three objectives are presented.

0.79 points

Three to five objectives are presented.
0.89 points

Three to five objectives are presented and detailed.
1 points

Three to five objectives are presented and thorough.

Rationale for How Findings Relate to the Topic and Proposed Intervention

Rationale for How Findings Relate to the Topic and Proposed Intervention
0 points

Rationale for each objective is omitted.
1.13 points

Rationale is incomplete. There are omissions. Rationale provided does not explain the relationship of findings to the topic and proposed intervention.
1.19 points

General rationale is provided for each objective and generally summarizes the relationship of most findings to the topic and proposed intervention. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions.
1.34 points

Rationale is provided for each objective and explains the relationship of findings to the topic and proposed intervention. Some detail is needed for clarity.
1.5 points

Rationale is clearly provided for each objective and thoroughly explains the relationship of the findings to the topic and proposed intervention.

Rationale for Autonomy and Social Justice (B)

Rationale for How Proposed Project and Objectives Advocate for Autonomy and Social Justice for Individuals and Diverse Populations (C2.5)
0 points

Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is omitted.

0.75 points

Incomplete rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy is not established.

0.79 points

Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is summarized. Some advocacy is established.
0.89 points

Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy is generally established.

1 points

Well-supported rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is clearly established.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives HERE

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
0.26 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

0.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
0.31 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
0.35 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
0.26 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
0.28 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
0.31 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

0.35 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
0.22 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
0.24 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
0.27 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

0.3 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.22 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
0.24 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
0.27 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
0.3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
0.15 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
0.16 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

0.18 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
0.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.