NRS 493 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your capstone project change proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. What benefit does peer review have over a regular research study/academic article?
NRS 493 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your capstone project change proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. What benefit does peer review have over a regular research study/academic article?
Topic 2 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your capstone project change proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. What benefit does peer review have over a regular research study/academic article?
Topic 2 DQ 1
Assessment Description
Define ethical research. Give one example of ethical misconduct, give examples of why you think this. Provide one example of an unethical research study and state why it is unethical.
ORDER A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT HERE
What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.
A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers
NRS 493 Topic 2 DQ 1 AND 2
Topic 2 DQ 1
The GCU is a reputable learning institute committed to advancing research and development. The institution has established library scholarly databases to enable easy access to research materials by the students. The two identified GCU scholarly databases that will help in finding the best research articles to support the capstone project change proposal include PubMed Central and CINAHL Complete. These databases are more advanced than general Internet searches because they have more reliable, credible, accurate, and detailed information (Sayers et al., 2021). The databases are also associated with the benefit of containing academic research studies and peer-reviewed articles that have been subjected to a thorough evaluation process. PubMed Central is the digital archive of life sciences journals for the National Library of Medicine while CINAHL Complete offers a wide collection of nursing articles and journals (Behrend, 2020). Both databases have academic research studies and peer-reviewed articles, which imply that the data contained in the databases are extremely credible.
There are numerous benefits associated with peer review over regular research studies. Peer-reviewed research studies undergo a thorough evaluation process from pundits in a given field. The process of peer review is instrumental because it ascertains that research articles are accurate, reliable, and have high value in the field (Hamilton et al., 2020). The process of peer review analyzes the research methodology, outcomes, and findings to establish whether or not they are appropriate for publication. Peer-reviewed articles are also integrated with indexing features that help in narrowing down the research scope. The articles also contain numerous features that help in improving the process of data retrieval (Silber‐Varod et al., 2019). As such, peer-reviewed articles are crucial in academic publishing because they provide insightful analysis, highly accurate, and provide more reliable data than regular research studies or academic articles.
References
Behrend, D. (2020). CINAHL complete. The Charleston Advisor, 22(2), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.22.2.26
Hamilton, D. G., Fraser, H., Hoekstra, R., & Fidler, F. (2020). Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review. Elife, 9, e62529. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62529
Sayers, E. W., Beck, J., Bolton, E. E., Bourexis, D., Brister, J. R., Canese, K., … & Sherry, S. T. (2021). Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic acids research, 49(D1), D10. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa892
Silber‐Varod, V., Eshet‐Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st‐century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3099-3118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12753
Topic 2 DQ 1
Ethical research refers to a research study that complies with the set of ethical principles that directs the way scientific research is carried out and disseminated (Boswell & Cannon, 2022). Research ethics helps in governing the conduct of researchers by providing guidelines for responsible research performance. Ethical research entails adherence to ethical norms such as privacy and confidentiality regulations, data sharing rules, patenting and copyright policies in safeguarding intellectual property interest, and guidelines for authorship. An example of ethical misconduct is the act of engaging participants in the research without seeking their informed consent. Failure to take informed consent from the participants exposes them to potential harm, which amounts to a violation of their rights of willing participation (Bazzano et al., 2021). Informed consent is a necessity in any research involving human participants. Seeking informed consent entails creating awareness among the participants about various factors including the duration of the research, directives to be followed, protection of their privacy and confidentiality, their rights, and the expected benefits and risks. In turn, informed consent enables voluntary participation in research.
Unethical research connotes experiments that violate ethical norms (Shamoo, 2022). Unethical research can be caused by different reasons such as failure to safeguard the privacy of participants, detrimental data collection process, and detection of concealed biases based on commercial, political, or other reasons. An example of unethical research is Tuskegee Syphilis Study. According to Vernon (2020), the researchers intended to monitor how syphilis progresses when left untreated. As such, they recruited men with syphilis and informed them they were going to be treated for free. However, it turned out they were deceived since no treatment was given to them.
References
Bazzano, L. A., Durant, J., & Brantley, P. R. (2021). A modern history of informed consent and the role of key information. Ochsner Journal, 21(1), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0105
Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2022). Introduction to nursing research: Incorporating evidence-based practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Shamoo, A. E. (2022). Unethical medical treatment and research in US territories. Accountability in Research, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2030720
Vernon, L. F. (2020). Tuskegee syphilis study, not America’s only medical scandal: Chester M. Southam, MD, Henrietta Lacks, and the Sloan-Kettering research scandal. Journal of Health Ethics, 16(2), 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1602.03