NRS 493 Week 6 Assignment: Literature Review

NRS 493 Week 6 Assignment: Literature Review

NRS 493 Week 6 Assignment: Literature Review

Assessment Description

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Week 6 Assignment: Literature Review
HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a review (750-1,000 words) that includes the following sections:

Title page

Introduction section

A comparison of research questions

A comparison of sample populations

A comparison of the limitations of the study

A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Literature Review – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total40 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Literature Review

Literature Review
0 points

An introduction is not present.
3 points

An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper.
3.16 points

An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading.
3.56 points

An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides incentive for the reader to continue reading.
4 points

An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading.

Comparison of Research Questions

Comparison of Research Questions
0 points

No comparison of research questions is presented.

6 points

A comparison of research questions is presented, but it is not valid.
6.32 points

A cursory though valid comparison of research questions is presented.

7.12 points

A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented.

8 points

A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented.

Comparison of Sample Populations

Comparison of Sample Populations
0 points

No comparison of sample populations is presented.
3 points

A comparison of sample populations is presented, but it is not valid.
3.16 points

A cursory though valid comparison of sample populations is presented.
3.56 points

A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented.
4 points

A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented.

Comparison of the Limitations of the Study

Comparison of the Limitations of the Study
0 points

No comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.

6 points

A comparison of the limitations of the study is presented, but it is not valid.
6.32 points

A cursory though valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
7.12 points

A moderately thorough and valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
8 points

A reflective and insightful comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.

Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research

Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research

0 points

No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented.
3 points

A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented, but they are not valid.
3.16 points

A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid, but they are cursory.

3.56 points

A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid and moderately thorough.
4 points

A conclusion and recommendations for further research are reflective and insightful.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

2.1 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

2.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

2.1 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Week 6 Assignment: Literature Review
HERE

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
2.21 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
1.8 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1.9 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

2.14 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1.9 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.14 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.26 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

1.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

1.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are pre