NSG 4150 Week 3 Assignment: Policy Development and Implementation

NSG 4150 Week 3 Assignment: Policy Development and Implementation

NSG 4150 Week 3 Assignment: Policy Development and Implementation

Assignment Overview:

Health policy refers to decisions, plans, and actions undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a society. In this 2-3 page paper, you will analyze professional nursing organization policies and local organizational policies.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NSG 4150 Week 3 Assignment: Policy Development and Implementation HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Assignment Instructions:

Professional Nursing Policy Initiative

Select a policy initiative at a professional nursing organization of your choice. Nurse.org has a list of professional organizations. Most professional nursing organizations will have a yearly policy agenda describing areas of focus and efforts to advance nursing practice, nursing education, or nursing research. Please feel free to choose a professional organization of your choice. The following are some examples:

NLN Public PolicyLinks to an external site.

ENA Public Policy AgendaLinks to an external site.

APNA AdvocacyLinks to an external site.

ANA AdvocacyLinks to an external site.

Introduction and Justification

Introduce and summarize your chosen professional policy initiative. Discuss why you chose this policy initiative, why you chose this professional organization, and why you feel it is important to advocate for this policy initiative.

Local Policy Identification

Identify an existing policy or new policy that should be developed at your place of employment, your local public health office, or another identified local place where nurses practice that aligns with your chosen professional nursing policy initiative. Outline the main components of your existing or proposed policy.

If a policy currently exists, explain how the current local policy aligns or misaligns with the professional policy initiative.

If the policy is being proposed, explain the gap in the policy structure that led you to decide to propose a new policy.

Policy Improvement

Suggest revisions to the existing policy you chose that would improve its alignment with your chosen professional policy initiative or explain how your proposed policy will be developed to ensure alignment with the chosen professional policy initiative.

Discuss both positive and negative financial implications of your proposed policy.

Outline the policy review process and procedures at your local

Given the opportunity to make revisions to your existing or proposed policy, outline next steps, considerations, timeline, and resources.

Provide evidence supporting local policy improvement and include at least two sources.

Conclusion and Reflection

In 1-2 paragraphs:

Summarize your policy justification and identification.

Synthesize your suggested recommendations for policy improvement.

Reflect on the process by discussing the following:

What went well and what didn’t go well?

What is your most important take-away from this experience?

What would you do differently?

How will this experience influence your practice?

Rubric

Policy Development and Implementation Paper Rubric

Policy Development and Implementation Paper Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction / Professional Nursing Policy Initiative

CSLO 1
20 pts

Exceptional

Provides an introduction that introduces and summarizes your chosen professional policy initiative. Introduction includes a discussion of why you chose this policy initiative, why you chose this professional organization, and why you feel its important to advocate for this policy initiative.

15 pts

Effective

Provides an incomplete introduction, or one that only partially introduces and summarizes your chosen professional policy initiative and/or discussion of why you chose this initiative and professional organization and why this policy is important.

10 pts

Developing

Provides an insufficient introduction or summary or discussion of importance of policy.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Introduction section missing, or no assignment submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLocal Policy Identification

CSLO 1

25 pts

Exceptional

Provides a complete outline of existing or proposed policy initiative including alignment or misalignment with professional policy initiative.

20 pts

Effective

Provides an incomplete summary or only partially outlines local policy initiative and/or alignment to professional policy.

10 pts

Developing

Provides an insufficient outline of local policy initiative and/or alignment to professional policy.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Section missing, or no assignment submitted.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Improvement

CSLO 1

Criteria

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NSG 4150 Week 3 Assignment: Policy Development and Implementation HERE

1. Provides suggested revisions to local policy.

2. Discusses positive and negative financial implications.

3. Outlines the policy review process and procedures at local organization.

4. Outlines next steps, consideration, timeline, and resources for revisions to local policy.

5. Provides evidence to support revisions (at least 2 sources).

30 pts

Exceptional

Meets all 5 criteria.

21 pts

Effective

Meets 3-4 criteria.

9 pts

Developing

Meets 1-2 criteria.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Section missing, or no assignment submitted.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

CSLO 1

Criteria

1. Summarizes policy justification and identification.

2. Synthesizes recommendations for policy improvement.
5 pts

Exceptional

Meets both (2) criteria.

2 pts

Developing

Meets 1 criteria.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Section missing, or no assignment submitted.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection

CSLO 1

Reflects on the process by discussing the following questions:

1. What went well and what didn’t go well?

2. What is your most important take-away from this experience?

3. What would you do differently?

4. How will this experience influence your practice?

10 pts

Exceptional

Provides an insightful reflection that discusses all (4) provided questions.

7 pts

Effective

Provides an insightful reflection that discusses 3 of the provided questions.

4 pts

Developing

 

Provides a reflection that discusses 2 of the provided questions.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Provides a reflection that discusses 1 of the provided questions; or section missing; or no assignment submitted.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Organization
5 pts

Exceptional

Excellent grammar, mechanics, and organization with 0 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of content; and use of complete sentences. Paper is of appropriate length 2-3 pages of content (excluding the title page and reference pages).

3 pts

Effective

Developing grammar, mechanics, and organization with 1-2 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of content; and use of complete sentences.

2 pts

Developing

Developing grammar, mechanics, and organization with 3 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of content; and use of complete sentences. Or paper is significantly under or over the page requirement.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Very poor grammar, mechanics, and organization with more than 3 errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of content; and use of complete sentences (in the introduction and conclusion). Or no assignment submitted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

The correct use of APA style for paper elements and formatting has been met without error for the following criteria:

1. Title Page

2. Set up for font, margins, spacing, and page numbers

3. Paper length of 2-3 pages including title and reference pages

4. Organization, including use of heading levels, introduction, and conclusion

5. Reference Page

6. The correct use of APA formatting has been met with zero error for in-text citations and the reference list.

5 pts

Exceptional

All criteria met.

3 pts

Effective

1-3 criteria not met.

2 pts

Developing

4-5 criteria not met.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Criteria not met; or APA formatting is not used; or no assignment submitted.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext