NUR 501 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-3)

NUR 501 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-3)

NUR 501 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-3)

NUR 501 Module 1 Discussion: Theory, Practice, & Research

Module 1 Discussion

null

icon Theory, Practice, & Research

Discuss the interrelationship among theory, practice, and research.

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 501 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-3) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

Distinguished – 5 points

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
Excellent – 4 points

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Fair – 2 points

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

Poor – 1 point

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

5 points

Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 3 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Excellent – 2 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Fair – 1 point

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 0 points

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 points
Response to Posts of Peers

Distinguished – 2 points

Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
Fair – 1 point

Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
Poor – 0 points

Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points
Total Points 10

NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion: Qualitative & Quantitative Research Design

Module 2 Discussion

null

icon Qualitative & Quantitative Research Design

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design.

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
Distinguished – 5 points

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

Excellent – 4 points

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

Fair – 2 points

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

Poor – 1 point

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

5 points

Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 3 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Excellent – 2 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Fair – 1 point

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 0 points

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 points
Response to Posts of Peers

Distinguished – 2 points

Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.

Fair – 1 point

Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
Poor – 0 points

Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points
Total Points 10

NUR 501Module 3 Discussion: Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care

null

icon Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care

Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why?

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

Distinguished – 5 points

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

Excellent – 4 points

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Fair – 2 points

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Poor – 1 point

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

5 points

Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 3 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Excellent – 2 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Fair – 1 point

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 0 points

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 points
Response to Posts of Peers

Distinguished – 2 points

Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.

Fair – 1 point

Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.

Poor – 0 points

Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points
Total Points 10

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 501 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-3) HERE

NUR 501 Module 3 Assignment: Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application

Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper

Goal:

Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory. You will select a middle range theory and identify application of nursing theories into clinical practice.

Content Requirements:

Components of the theory

Discuss the major concepts of the theory

Philosophical basis or worldview change, advancing health
Structural aspects of the theory

Discuss the framework of the theory.
Identify an area of your practice where this theory could be applicable

What question does the theory help to answer?

Describe the area of interest in relationship to the theory/theoretical model.

Is it appropriate for the practice setting and is it applicable?

Discuss the strength and weakness of the theory. If there is weakness, discuss what makes it difficult to be used in practice.

Use of theory in clinical practice.

Performing a literature review is essential to completing this section. If there is no literature available about the application of this theory in practice, address reason(s) why based on your findings.
Evaluation of theory

Is this theory used to understand and apply into practice?

What difficulties did you encounter or would anticipate encountering in using this theory?

What would make this theory more usable or applicable to practice?

Submission Instructions:

The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

The paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions.)

The paper is to be 3 – 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Essay/Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems
Distinguished – 4 points

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

Excellent – 3 points

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

Fair – 2 points

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
Poor – 1 point

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

Distinguished – 4 points

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Excellent – 3 points

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

Fair – 2 points

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Poor – 1 point

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

Distinguished – 4 points

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
Excellent – 3 points

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

Fair – 2 points

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
Poor – 1 point

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

Distinguished – 4 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

Excellent – 3 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Fair – 2 points

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Poor – 1 point

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 4 points

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

Excellent – 3 points

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Fair – 2 points

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 1 point

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4 points
Total Points 20