NUR 590 Discussion: Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change 

NUR 590 Discussion: Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change

NUR 590 Discussion: Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change

Assessment Description

Applying a model or framework for change ensures that a process is in place to guide the efforts for change. In 500-750 words, discuss the model or framework you will use to implement your evidence-based practice proposal project. You will use the model or framework you select in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Discussion: Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Include the following:

Identify the selected model or framework for change and discuss its relevance to your project.
Discuss each of the stages in the change model/framework.
Describe how you would apply each stage of the model or theoretical framework in your proposed implementation.
Create a concept map for the conceptual model or framework you selected to illustrate how it will be applied to your project. Attach this as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

1.2 Apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level.

Rubric Criteria
Total

100 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

5 points

All format elements are correct.

Concept Map for Model or Framework

Concept Map for Model or Framework

0 points

A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is omitted.

12 points

The concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is incomplete or inaccurate. The concept map is attached, but not in the Appendix.

13.2 points

A general concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. There are inaccuracies.

13.8 points

A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

15 points

A detailed and accurate concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix.

Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation

Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation

0 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is omitted.

12 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is incomplete.

13.2 points

General application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is outlined. More information is needed.

13.8 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

15 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is thoroughly described.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Discussion: Benchmark Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change HERE

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (B)

Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (C.1.2)

0 points

The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not demonstrated.

8 points

The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not consistently demonstrated. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies.

8.8 points

The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is generally demonstrated. There are some gaps or inaccuracies.

9.2 points

The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is adequately demonstrated.

10 points

The author has clearly demonstrated the ability to effectively apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level.

Stages for Model or Framework

Stages for Model or Framework

0 points

The stages in the change model or framework are not discussed.

10.4 points

The stages in the change model or framework are only partially discussed.

11.44 points

The stages in the change model or framework are outlined. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed.

11.96 points

The stages in the change model or framework are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

13 points

The stages in the change model or framework are thoroughly discussed.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Selected Model or Framework for Change

Selected Model or Framework for Change

0 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are not discussed.

9.6 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are incomplete.

10.56 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are summarized. More information or support is needed.

11.04 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

12 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are thoroughly discussed. Rationale or support is provided.

Required Sources

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.

4 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

4.4 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

4.6 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.