NUR 590 Topic 5 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan

Assessment Description

In 1,250-1,500 words, discuss the implementation plan for your evidence-based practice project proposal. When required, create the appropriate form, table, image, or graph to fully illustrate that aspect of the intervention plan and include them in an appendix of your paper. You will use the implementation plan, including the associated documents in your appendices, in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Topic 5 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Include the following:

[elementor-template id="144964"]

Describe the setting and access to potential subjects. If there is a need for a consent or approval form, then one must be created. Include a draft of the form as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Create a timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. Based on the timeline you created, describe the amount of time needed to complete this project. Include a draft of the timeline as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Develop a budget and resource list. Consider the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Based on the budget and resource list you developed: (a) describe the resources (human, fiscal, and other) or changes needed in the implementation of the solution; (b) outline the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer-related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Include a draft of the budget and resource list as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Explain whether you would select a qualitative or quantitative design to collect data and evaluate the effectiveness of your evidence-based practice project proposal. Provide rationale to support your selection.

Describe the methods and instruments (questionnaire, scale, or test) to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Include the method or instrument as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Explain the process for delivering the intervention and indicate if any training will be needed.

Discuss the stakeholders that are needed to implement the plan.

Consider all of the aspects of your implementation plan and discuss potential barriers or challenges to the plan. Propose strategies for overcoming these.

Establish the feasibility of the implementation plan.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Implementation Plan – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Setting and Access to Potential Subjects

Description of setting and access to potential subjects; consent or approval form is attached in an appendix, if needed.

0 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are not described. A consent or approval form needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.

6.72 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are only partially described. A consent or approval form is attached but contains significant errors; the form is not attached in an appendix.
7.39 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are generally described. Some additional information is needed. A consent or approval form is attached but requires some revision; the form is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
7.73 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are described. A consent or approval form is needed and attached in an appendix. Minor revision may be needed on the form or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

8.4 points

The setting and access to potential subjects are clearly described. A well-developed and accurate consent or approval form is attached correctly in an appendix.

Timeline

Description of time required; draft of timeline is attached in an appendix.

0 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is not described. A timeline needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.

7.68 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is only partially described. A timeline is attached but contains significant errors; the timeline is not attached in an appendix.
8.45 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is generally described. Some additional information is needed. A timeline is attached but requires some revision; the timeline is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
8.83 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is described and general enough to be implemented at any date. Minor revision may be needed on the timeline, or to correct formatting issues in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
9.6 points

The amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly described and general enough to be implemented at any date. A well-developed timeline is attached correctly in an appendix.

Budget and Resource List

Description of resources or changes required; outline of cost and budget and resource list are attached in an appendix.
0 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are omitted. A budget and resource list need to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
7.68 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are partially presented. A budget and resource list are attached but contain significant errors; the list is not attached in an appendix.
8.45 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are generally presented. Some additional information is needed. A budget and resource list are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
8.83 points

Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are presented. Minor revision maybe needed on the budget or resource list, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

9.6 points

A detailed description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are clearly presented. A well-developed budget and resource list are attached correctly in an appendix.

Research Design

Quantitative or qualitative design to collect data and evaluate effectiveness.

0 points

Research design is not selected.
6.72 points

A research design is selected. It is unclear how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal.
7.39 points

A research design is selected. A general explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. More rational is needed for support.

7.73 points

A research design is selected. An explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Adequate rationale is provided for support.

8.4 points

A research design is selected. A thorough explanation for how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Methods and Instruments

Methods or instruments used for monitoring implementation.
0 points

The methods or instruments are omitted. The methods or instruments need to be created and attached in an appendix.

6.72 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are only partially discussed. A methods or instruments are attached but contain significant errors; the methods or instruments are not attached in an appendix.
7.39 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are summarized, but more information is needed. The methods or instruments are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.

7.73 points

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are described. Minor revision may be needed for the methods or instruments, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

8.4 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Topic 5 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan HERE

The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are thoroughly described. The methods or instruments are accurate and correctly attached in an appendix.

Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training

0 points

The process for delivering the intervention is omitted.
6.72 points

The process for delivering the intervention is only partially described.
7.39 points

The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is summarized. More information or support is needed.

7.73 points

The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is explained. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
8.4 points

The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is thoroughly explained. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Stakeholders for Implementation

0 points

Stakeholders needed to implement the plan are omitted.

6.72 points

The discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is incomplete.

7.39 points

A summary of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. More information or support is needed.
7.73 points

An adequate discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
8.4 points

A thorough discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming

0 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are not discussed.
6.72 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are only partially discussed.
7.39 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are summarized. General strategies for overcoming these are presented.
7.73 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are discussed and strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

8.4 points

Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are thoroughly discussed and clear strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Evidence of Feasibility

Evidence of Feasibility
0 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is not discussed.
6.72 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is only partially discussed.
7.39 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is outlined. More information or support is needed to demonstrate the feasibility of the plan.
7.73 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
8.4 points

The feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale is provided for support.

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.

4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.
5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

7.73 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction
0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
7.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
8.45 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
8.83 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
5.52 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
6 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format

Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
4.8 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
5.28 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
5.52 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
6 points

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.
4.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
5.28 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

[elementor-template id="144964"]

NUR 590 Topic 5 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan