NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality
NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to address health care issues facing the United States in terms of economics and quality. Choose one of the following topics (suicide rates, chronic disease, obesity, health care disparities, or missed care) and write a 1,250- to 1,500-word paper addressing the following:
Explain why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
Discuss the impact that health care economics has on your topic.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Discuss what you could do as a nurse leader to make an impact on your chosen issue in your professional setting.
Analyze the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
Describe what impact you can have on health policy as a nurse leader.
Include 3–4 peer-reviewed resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Economics and Quality – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total100 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Significant Health Care Issue
Significant Health Care Issue
0 points
Does not explain why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
12 points
Unclearly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
13.2 points
Partially explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
13.8 points
Clearly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
15 points
Compellingly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
Impact of Health Care Economics
0 points
Does not discuss the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
16 points
Poorly discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
17.6 points
Somewhat discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
18.4 points
Succinctly discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
20 points
Professionally discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
Making an Impact
Making an Impact
0 points
Does not discuss what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
12 points
Inappropriately discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
13.2 points
Broadly discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
13.8 points
Appropriately discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
15 points
Insightfully discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
The Impact of Quality Measures on Reimbursement
The Impact of Quality Measures on Reimbursement
0 points
Does not analyze the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
16 points
Incorrectly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
17.6 points
Ambiguously analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
18.4 points
Correctly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
20 points
Thoroughly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
Impact as a Nurse Leader
Impact as a Nurse Leader
0 points
Does not describe the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
12 points
Unrealistically describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
13.2 points
Briefly describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
13.8 points
Accurately describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
15 points
Realistically describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
4.4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.4 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.6 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, with only minor errors.
5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.