NUR 740 Assignment 8: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale

NUR 740 Assignment 8: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale

NUR 740 Assignment 8: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale

Introduction

As advanced practice nurses, you will be called on to participate as leaders in decision making about health policy. That participation can include development and implementation of health policies at the local, state, and national levels.

Completion of this project will give you the experience to participate in health policy development and/or reform in your future advanced nursing practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 740 Assignment 8: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Assignment Guidelines

Based on the health policy selected in Assignment 6.1: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Selection, compose a three- to four-page argumentative essay defending the need for a new or reformed policy to address issues of social justice and equity. The essay should provide a compelling, research-based rationale supporting the need for the new or reformed policy.

Support your explanation with at least 10 credible references (not older than three years) cited in APA 7th edition format:

No more than three references from websites (appropriate websites are only those that end in .org, .gov, or .edu)

At least three research articles

At least three professional nursing journal articles

When preparing your references, double-check that the DOI (if used) is correct. Also check that the URLs for journals are correct.

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 8.1: Contemporary Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale page.

ssignment 8.1: Health Policy Project: Policy Reform Rationale Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Content

view longer description

20 to >18 pts

Meets All Expectations

Follows directions; addresses all prompts thoroughly and appropriately.

18 to >16 pts

Meets Most Expectations

Follows directions, but responses to prompts could be expanded.

16 to >14 pts

Meets Some Expectations

Generally follows directions, but responses to prompts show notable gaps.

14 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow directions; responses to prompts are missing.

/ 20 pts

Grasp of Significance

view longer description

10 to >9 pts

Meets All Expectations

Projects thorough knowledge of the need for a new or reformed policy to address issues of social justice and equity.

9 to >8 pts

Meets Most Expectations

Displays knowledge of the need for a new or reformed policy to address issues of social justice and equity.

8 to >7 pts

Meets Some Expectations

Displays some knowledge of the need for a new or reformed policy to address issues of social justice and equity.

7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provides little or no knowledge of the need for a new or reformed policy to address issues of social justice and equity.

/ 10 pts

Clarity and Logic

view longer description
5 to >4 pts

Meets All Expectations

All responses are correct with a clear and logical path to conclusions.

4 to >3 pts

Meets Most Expectations

Most responses are correct and clear but with a circuitous path to conclusions.

3 to >2 pts

Meets Some Expectations

Some responses are correct but lack clarity and/or a logical path to conclusions.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Responses are incorrect and unclear.

/ 5 pts

References and Support

view longer description
10 to >9 pts

Meets All Expectations

Includes six to seven credible resources, five of which come from peer-reviewed journal articles that are current within five years (or up to 10 years if the materials are still relevant/up-to-date).

9 to >8 pts

Meets Most Expectations

Includes five to six credible resources, four of which come from peer-reviewed journal articles. Most resources are current within five years (or up to 10 years if the materials are still relevant/up-to-date).

8 to >7 pts

Meets Some Expectations

Includes four to five credible resources, three of which come from peer-reviewed journal articles. Some resources are current within five years (or up to 10 years if the materials are still relevant/up-to-date).

7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Includes fewer than four credible resources, two or fewer of which come from peer-reviewed journal articles. Few resources are current within five years (or up to 10 years if materials are still relevant/up-to-date).

/ 10 pts

Mechanics

view longer description
5 to >4 pts

Meets All Expectations

Consistently uses correct grammar with rare misspellings. Adheres to all APA guidelines, format, and requirements if needed.

4 to >3 pts

Meets Most Expectations

Few grammatical or spelling errors. Closely follows APA guidelines and format with only minor errors.

3 to >2 pts

Meets Some Expectations

Errors in spelling and grammar. Some errors in APA citations or format.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Uses poor spelling and grammar. Does not follow APA guidelines or format.

/ 5 pts
Total Points: 0

Choose a submission type