NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5)

NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5)

NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5)

Module 1 Assignment  

Legislator E-mail Exercise

To take a proactive role in nursing policy, you will prepare an email to your legislator about a current nursing issue.  You must first identify your legislator. Then you will write a concise, professionally worded e-mail to one of the state-level legislators about a current nursing issue that is important to you.  You will:

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

1.            Find the legislator of the state you are licensed in.  You will only write your email to one legislator, even if many are listed. You must only use the legislator in the state you are licensed in.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

2.            Complete the issue description and action plan section prior to composing the email as to organize your thoughts.

3.            Write your final e-mail in the space provided on this assignment document.

4.            You MUST include one personal example about how the issue personally affects your nursing career.

5.            Use at least 2 referencesfrom a scholarly article (dated within the past 5 years)with 2 in-text citations to support your thoughts and list in correct APA format.

6.            Upload and submit the email assignment you have prepared for your legislator intoCanvas.

It is not necessary for you to actually send your email to you legislator unless you choose to do so.

Performance Objective:

•             Identify the ways nurses can personally take part in shaping future nursing care.

A.            Identifying Your Legislators:Find out who your legislators are at the statelevel. Use a google search to locate your states legislative system, or here is a helpful link in which you can identify your state- https://www.congress.gov/state-legislature-websites

•             You only need one legislator that you are going to address your issue to.  If email information is not available then you would only place their physical address. In rare cases a physical address is not listed, please include webpage address.

Record their names, titles, and contact information here:

Name-

Title-

Contact Information-

B. Issue Decription and Action Plan: Identify a current nursing issue important to you and your practice. To help you begin organizing your thoughts, complete the following section.

1). State the nursing issue that affects you in 1-2 sentences.

Now, list three reasons or examples as to how this nursing issues personally affects your practice.

2). What help/assistance are you requesting from your legislator?

Now, list three reasons or examples as to why this assistance would positively impact nurses.

C.  Writing the E-mail: Write an e-mail explaining the importance of this issue to your practice. Limit the e-mail to one page. Choose details you developed above; use the ones that you think create the strongest and most persuasive e-mail. Remember to include a personal example from your practice.

Follow the format of the sample e-mail located in the assignment instructions textbox. (The format must be strictly followed, especially for how to address the legislator and inclusion of your home address to classify you as a constituent.)

Be sure to edit your e-mail for spelling, grammar, and word usage. Read it aloud, and/or get a friend or relative to read it and provide feedback. You will not be sending this to your legislator as part of this assignment but you may choose to send it to them on your own to make them aware of the issue you have addressed.For full credit, include two in-text citations from scholarly articles dated within past 5 years. “Scholarly artilces” are only classified as peer-reviewed journal articles are written by scholars or professionals who are experts in their fields.Magazine articles, administration documents, reports from different kinds of organizations, essays, opinion pieces, or Wikipedia resources are not scholarly articles.

Write your final e-mail in the space provided below.

Space for you to write your final e-mail to your legislator: Type directly below.

D.  References:Please list references here. At least twofrom scholarly artilces (dated within the past 5 years) are required to support your thoughts. Please use correct APA formatting.

Module 2 Assignment  

Standards of Nursing Practice

In this Module 2 assignment, you will review your own understanding of standards of nursing practice and their applications to nursing.  The nurse must comprehend the minimum acceptable level of practice that is expected of them. Then, you will know if a rule or standard is being violated.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment. The Standards of Practice Rule 217.11 can be found here- https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-11.asp

Performance Objectives:

•             Understand the TX BON Rule 217.11 Standards of Nursing Practice

•             Apply basic knowledge to practice

•             Awareness of nursing actions that fail to meet the rule

Part 1

TX BON Rule 217.11, Standards of Nursing Practice, is what the BON expects of you as a practicing nurse.  Define TX BON rule 217.11 in your own words.Why is this important?

Write 4 professionally written sentences for full credit.

Part 2

Patient safety is always our number one priority. A nurse has a duty to the patient to ensure safety. The “most important” actions a nurse can take is to follow the Rule 217.11 (1) (T) which- “holds the nurse accountable to accept only those assignments that are within the nurse’s educational preparation, experience, knowledge, and physical and emotional ability.”  Now that you are familiar with this rule, describe a time in which you were in a situation that violated this rule. What would you do if you were placed in those circumstances again? Write 4 professionally written sentences for full credit.

Part 3

Fill in the blanks

Complete the following fill in the blank sentences from your Module 2 Chapter 15 reading requirement. Each answer is worth 5 points.

1). Law and nursing are both professions devoted to helping patients/clients and society by advocating for ______________ improvements and justice.

2). The nurse has a _____________ to practice competently and to possess the knowledge, skills, and abilities required for lawful, safe, and effective practice.

3). Informed consent cases are a type of _____________ suit.

4). In terms of accountability, nurses must take responsibility for their actions and the actions of others involved in the _____________ process.

Module 3 Assignment  

Peer Review

In the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios.  REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.

Performance Objectives:

•             Differentiate between the the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident (217.16 h)

•             Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.

Part 1: Applying Rule 217.16

Let’s review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)-

A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses’ actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.

A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.

Let’s come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee evaluating a fellow nurse’s actions. Think about the word “harp.”

•             H- no significant Harm

•             A- nurse must take Accountability

•             R- easily Remediated

•             P- no Pattern of this behavior

However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents within a 12-month period.

Look at this case study scenario below.

“Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve.  After blood cultures come back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered.  He tells Nurse Karen and the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one hour).  Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute period.  She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50 mg via IV with orders.  The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20 minutes.  Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history of incidents.  She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit manager.  Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV medication for the next 60 days.  Karen agrees to this plan.”

Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp

Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or Why not? Please write four (4)professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Minor or Reportable?

Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review

First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.

Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp

to review. Apply the information to this case study-

“Nurse Sam is charting at the nurse’s station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit secretary gathered.  Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently).  The nurse manager approaches Sam and loudly states, “I am glad you are here.  Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior.  I know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient Safety Committee.  I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month.  I thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably fired.  I don’t have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt you can with this short notice.”

How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and discuss in the text box.

Rule 219.19 a (2)Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Part 3: Multiple Choice Questions

Answer the following multiple-choice questions according to the Module 3 readings and lectures. They are worth 5 points each, there is only 1 correct answer.

1). According to Clevette and colleagues, examples of unsafe, common disciplinary actions reviewed by boards of nursing include all of the following EXCEPT-

a). Destruction or alteration of patient records, including fraudulent charting and/or signatures and/or replacement of records with intent to mislead or deceive.

b). Physical patient abuse, such as when a nurse hits, strikes, or performs similar physical acts of aggression involving patient contact.

c). Practicing beyond the authorized scope, such as administering medications without a physician’s order.

d). Failure to implement safeguards to ensure patient confidentiality and integrity of patients protected health information, violating HIPPA.

2). Rule 217.19 in Texas, Incident Based Nursing Peer Review and Whistleblower Protections provides to the nurse being peer reviewed EXCEPT-

a). Minimum protection

b). Minimum due process

c). Minimum legal representation

d). Minimum rights afforded to nurse

3). If a nurse does not agree to the discipline set due to a complaint made against this nurse, after reviewing the proposed agreed order, they can request a-

a). Informal conference

b). Formal conference

c). Informal hearing

d). Formal hearing

4). Common nursing remedial education courses required if a nurse is being disciplined are-

a). medication refresher, ethics, geriatric care, nursing jurisprudence, care coordination.

b). ethics course, care coordination, documentation, medication refresher.

c). physical assessment refresher, critical thinking, documentation, medication refresher, geriatric care.

d). nursing jurisprudence, documentation, ethics, medication refresher, physical assessment refresher and critical thinking.

Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.

Module 4 Assignment  

Safe Harbor

Due to staffing shortages and the unpredictability of hospital needs, nurses are sometimes asked to take on assignments outside their normal routines.  As a healthcare professional, you must understand your options when asked to take on such assignments, the risks associated with accepting some assignments, and the protections afforded you by the law.  Reflect upon your learning about the Safe Harbor protection as well as any experiences you have had in this realm.  Then follow the instructions and complete the Safe Harbor form based upon a fictitious scenario.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.

Performance Objectives:

•             Explain and apply appropriate options regarding acceptance or rejectionof assignments, including the use of Safe Harbor.

•             Answer fill in the blank questions according to the readings this week.

Part 1: Safe Harbor Scenario and Questions

Nursing safe harbor is a law that nurses can use to absolve themselves of liability when forced to commit an act that the nurse believes violates Texas Board Statutes and Rules. Every nurse should be aware of the statutes and rules governing their profession. If a patient, supervisor or doctor asks the nurse to violate one of these rules, the nurse can invoke safe harbor before committing the act to ensure that they aren’t held legally responsible for what happens next. This protects them from facing punitive measures from their employer, losing their nursing license or being sued in court for putting a patient’s life in danger.

Explore the Case Study Scenario and place yourself in this situation. Answer the following questions according to your knowledge of Safe Harbor from the lectures and readings this week.

On Sunday, August 6th, you arrive to Saint Luke’s Hospital at 7pm for your night shift and clock into the ICU. Maria, the Charge Nurse, approaches you as you are putting your bag in a locker. “Thank goodness you are here”, she says. “You are going to have to take extra patients tonight. I am dealing with 2 nurses who just called in sick. Your assignment tonight will include the septic and stroke patients you had last night, but you also need to take on two more- one with a brain aneurysm and one that is post op major cardiac surgery.” You know that this is an impossible task and would be placing the patients in serious harm. You ask if anyone can float to the floor or if someone can be called in, but no one is available. “This is all on you. I need you to be a team player here,” says Maria. You decide to claim Safe Harbor and find Christine, the Nurse Supervisor, who will invoke the Quick Request form on your behalf?

1). What are the 4 choices every RN has when given an assignment?

1).

2).

3).

4).

2). Based on the scenario above, you have decided to claim Safe Harbor. Refer to Rule 217.11 Standard of Nursing Practice, specifically Rule 217.11 1(T). Type the Rule as it appears into the first text box. Based on this rule, why did you claim Safe Harbor? Type in second box.

https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-11.asp

Rule 217.11 1(T)-

Why did you claim Safe Harbor?

3). Name the two forms that need to be completed both before and after your shift. ***Update Spring 2020, you can now invoke orally to supervisor who then can record the event, but forms still must be filled out***

1.

2.

Part 2: Safe Harbor Quick Request Form

Below you will find the Safe Harbor Quick Request Form that must be completed before you engage in the care of these patients. Fill out the text box portion as you are the nurse in the scenario.

Do NOT fax or mail this form to the BON. Give it to your supervisor.

BON Safe Harbor Quick Request Form

A valid Safe Harbor Quick Request must include the following information (  ):

•             ?? Name(s) of the nurse(s) invoking safe harbor:

•             ?? Name of the supervisor recording the safe harbor invocation on behalf of the nurse(s), if applicable [*Required if the nurse(s) orally invoke(s) safe harbor in accordance with NPR Law §303.005(b-1).]:

•             ?? Date and time of the safe harbor invocation:

•             ?? Location where the requested conduct or assignment that is the subject of the safe harbor invocation occurred:

•             ?? Name of the person who requested the nurse(s) engage in the conduct or made the assignment that is the subject of the safe harbor invocation:

•             ?? BRIEF explanation of why the nurse(s) is(are) requesting a nursing peer review committee determination [For assistance, please review Board Rules 217.11 &217.12.]:

?? Signature(s) of the nurse(s) invoking safe harbor [*This form must be signed by the nurse(s) invoking safe harbor even if the supervisor completes the form in accordance with NPR Law §303.005(b-1) & (b-2).]:

Your Typed Signature:

?? Signature of the supervisor recording the nurse’s safe harbor invocation, if applicable [*Required if the nurse(s) orally invoke(s) safe harbor.]:

Your Supervisors Typed Signature:

DO NOT FAX OR MAIL THIS FORM TO THE BON. GIVE THIS FORM TO THE SUPERVISOR WHO MADE THE ASSIGNMENT OR REQUESTED THE CONDUCT FOR WHICH YOU ARE INVOKING SAFE HARBOR, AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS.

This Safe Harbor Quick Request Form is part 1 of 2 for valid invocation of safe harbor. Please complete part 2 of 2 (the Comprehensive Written Request for Safe Harbor Nursing Peer Review) before leaving the work setting at the end of the work period.

Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5) HERE

Module 5 Assignment  

Reflective Questions and Malpractice

According to the American Nurses Association, Standard 15- “the nurse is required to evaluate his or her own practice in relation to professional practice, standards, guidelines, relevant statutes, rules, regulations, organizational policies, and procedures.” Examples of competencies related to this standard include self-reflection and self-evaluation to identify areas of professional growth. In Part 1 of this assignment, you are asked to reflect on two specific key points for the course. Then, in Part 2, you will read a fictitious scenario and identify pertinent facts that pose risks for malpractice claims. Each year, nurses make themselves vulnerable for potential malpractice claims because they are not well-informed about malpractice elements. It is imperative you understand malpractice rules, regulations and facts to protect your nursing license.

Performance Objectives:

•             Understand the benefits of reflection in professional practice.

•             Incorporate ANA Standard 15 into the writing assignment.

•             Recognize the importance of BON Rules and Legal protections and its impact on the nursing profession.

•             Synthesis of module topics into professional growth.

•             Malpractice implications for nursing.

•             Apply the four elements of a malpractice claim to specific incidents.

Key points:

1). What did you take away from the course?

2). Describe a TX BON Rule or legal topic. Choose one from the table below. Explain the implication it has on the nursing profession.

Topics to choose from-

•             217.11 Standards of Practice

•             217.12 Unprofessional Conduct

•             217.16 Minor Incident

•             217.19 Incident Based Peer Review and Whistleblower Protections

•             217.20 Safe Harbor

•             217.13 Peer Assistance Program

•             Policy and advocacy

•             Investigation and discipline

•             Boundaries and social media

•             Staffing

•             Nurse fatigue

•             Texas Peer Assistance Program for Nursing (TPAPN)

•             Legal duty to the patient

•             Malpractice

Part 1: Reflecting on Course Material

Reflective Questions- type directly into this text box. Five professionally written sentences required for full credit for each Key Point.

Key Point 1:

What did you take away from this course?

Key Point 2:Explain the topicchosen from the table and its implication for the nursing profession.

Topic Chosen:

Implications:

Part 2: Potential Malpractice Claim

Read this scenario. Decide if the situation presents potential elements of malpractice.

Nurse A was assigned to Mr. Jones, a post-surgical patient on the Medical-Surgical floor, who had been doing well on the day shift.  Nurse A was working a 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift.  (Dr. Grumpy, Mr. Jones’s treating physician, had screamed at Nurse A last month when Nurse A called him at 3:00 A.M. to report a change in status of another of Dr. Grumpy’s patients.) During this shift, Nurse A became uneasy about the status of Mr. Jones, which reflected a substantial change in blood pressure and pulse, but Nurse A did not call Dr. Grumpy, choosing instead to “watch” the situation.  At approximately 5:00 A.M., Mr. Jones had to be rushed to emergency surgery with internal bleeding.  Now, 1½ years later, Mr. Jones has not recovered from the second surgery.

List the 4 elements of a malpractice claim and, for each of the 4 elements, state the facts in the scenario support that specific element. All 4 elements and 4 corresponding facts must be stated for full credit.

Elements of Malpractice Claim   Pertinent Facts

1)

2)

3)

4)

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • The is a great resource
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

(0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
(0%) – 0 (0%)
(0%) – 0 (0%)
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

(0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

(0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Participation
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
(0%) – 0 (0%)
(0%) – 0 (0%)
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 3375 Course Discussions & Assignments (Module 1-5)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?