NURS 5051 Module 02 Week 04 Assignment: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology

NURS 5051 Module 02 Week 04 Assignment: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology

NURS 5051 Module 02 Week 04 Assignment: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology

This week, we will continue to explore the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care and how that success is measured.

Patient outcomes and fulfilling care goals are major ways healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 5051 Module 02 Week 04 Assignment: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

The assignment is a written project proposal reflecting how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:

Describe the project you propose.

Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.

Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.

Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.

Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.

Please read the rubric carefully. APA format is required if you need assistance please go to the Walden Writing Center.

LEARNING RESOURCES:

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)

Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)

Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site.. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 543-548.

Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(5), 209-213.

Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site.. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

Please follow the rubric:

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response topics are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 5051 Module 02 Week 04 Assignment: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology HERE

The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts

Total Points: 100