NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis 

NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis

NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis

Back to Week at a Glance

(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/109907/modules/items/396159 

(https://cdn-

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis 

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Adobe/OrigImage- LgRendition/AdobeStockLicense_191797895.jpeg)

An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

The musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.

Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. How these processes interact to affect the patient.

Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates

(https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates) ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as

WK8Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis HERE

  1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for
Criteria Ratings Pts
Develop a 1- to 2- page case study 30 to >27.0 pts Excellent 27 to >24.0 pts Good 24 to >22.0 pts Fair 22 to >0 pts Poor  
analysis, examining the

patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. …

The response includes

accurate, clear,

and detailed explanations of the

musculoskeletal

pathophysiologic processes of

The response describes the patient symptoms. …

The response includes accurate,

explanations of the

musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these

symptoms and is

The response describes the patient symptoms

in a manner that is vague or

inaccurate……. The

response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of

patients who present these symptoms and is

supported by

The response describes the patient symptoms

in a manner that is vague and

inaccurate, or the description is

missing…… The

response does not include

explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of

patients who

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30 pts

  patients who present these

symptoms and is

supported by evidence and/or

research, as

explanations that are vague or based

on inappropriate

present these symptoms, or the

explanations are

 
  supported by

evidence and/or

appropriate, to

support the

evidence/research. vague or based on

inappropriate

 
  research, as appropriate, to

support the

explanation.   evidence/research.  
  explanation.        
Explain how the  

30 to >27.0 pts

 

27 to >24.0 pts

 

24 to >22.0 pts

 

22 to >0 pts

30 pts
highlighted processes interact to affect the

patient.

Excellent The response includes an

accurate,

complete,

Good

The response includes an accurate

explanation of

Fair

The response

includes a vague or inaccurate

explanation of how

Poor

The response

includes a vague or inaccurate

explanation of how

 
  detailed, and

specific

how the

highlighted

the highlighted

processes interact

the highlighted

processes interact

 
  explanation of how the

highlighted

processes

interact to affect the patient and

to affect the patient,

with explanations that are based on

to affect the patient,

with explanations that are based on

 
  processes

interact to affect the patient and is

is supported by evidence and/or

research, as

inappropriate

evidence/research.

inappropriate or missing

evidence/research.

 
  supported by

evidence and/or

appropriate, to

support the

     
  research, as explanation.      

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
  appropriate, to support the explanation.        
Explain any  

25 to >22.0 pts

 

22 to >19.0 pts

 

19 to >17.0 pts

 

17 to >0 pts

 
racial/ethnic

variables that may impact

physiological functioning.

Excellent

The response includes an accurate,

complete,

Good

The response includes an accurate

explanation of

Fair

The response

includes a vague or inaccurate

explanation of

Poor

The response

includes a vague or inaccurate

explanation of

 
  detailed, and specific

explanation of

racial/ethnic

variables that may impact

racial/ethnic

variables that may

impact physiological

racial/ethnic

variables that may

impact physiological

 
  racial/ethnic

variables that

physiological

functioning and

functioning, and/or

explanations that

functioning, or the

explanations are

 

25 pts

  may impact physiological

functioning and

is supported by evidence and/or

research, as

are based on inappropriate

evidence/research.

based on

inappropriate or no evidence/research.

 
  is supported by

evidence and/or

appropriate, to

support the

     
  research, as appropriate, to

support the

explanation.      
  explanation.        
Written Expression  

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…… A clear

and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that

delineate all required criteria.

 

4 to >3.5 pts Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time….. The

purpose,

introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

 

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and

sentences follow

writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time. …

The purpose,

introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

 

3 to >0 pts Poor

Paragraphs and sentences

follow writing standards for

flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

… No purpose statement,

introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
and Formatting – Paragraph

Development and

 
Organization:

Paragraphs make

 
clear points that support well-

developed ideas,

 
flow logically, and

demonstrate

 
continuity of ideas. Sentences are

carefully focused

 
—neither long and

rambling nor short

 
and lacking

substance. A clear

 
Criteria Ratings Pts
and comprehensive

purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all

required criteria.

         
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation  

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and

punctuation with no errors.

 

4 to >3.5 pts Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,

spelling, and punctuation errors.

 

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 

3 to >0 pts Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

 

 

 

 

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,

indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-

text citations, and

 

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 

4 to >3.0 pts Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

 

3 pts Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA

format errors.

 

3 to >0 pts Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 pts

reference list.          
Total Points: 100

 

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 6501 Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis 

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?