NURS 6521 Week 8 Assignment: Pharmacology for Psychological Disorders

Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.
Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6521 Week 8 Assignment: Pharmacology for Psychological Disorders HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 6521 Week 8 Assignment: Pharmacology for Psychological Disorders

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.

Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
I have uploaded the information on the medication choices that I chose on the interactive portion. Aricept was chosen each time

Criteria	Ratings							Pts
Briefly summarize the patient case	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent		17 to >15.0 pts Good		15 to >13.0 pts Fair		13 to >0 pts Poor
study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific.	The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including		The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the		The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details		The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details
	specific and complete details on each of the three		three decisions made for the patient presented.		on each of the three decisions made for the		on each of the three decisions made for the	20 pts
	decisions made for the patient presented.				patient presented.		patient presented, or is missing.
Based on the decisions you	25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature……. The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.	22 to >19.0 pts Good The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature…….. The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.		19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature……. The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.		17 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature, or is missing…… The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation		25 pts
recommended for the patient case
study, explain whether you believe the decisions
provided were supported by the
evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide
examples. Be sure to support your response with
evidence and references from
outside resources.

Criteria	Ratings						Pts
					provided, or is missing.
What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case	17 to >15.0 pts Good The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. …	15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. …		13 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned,
	study assigned. … The response	The response includes relevant	The response includes		or is missing. … The response
	includes specific and relevant outside reference	outside reference examples that lend support for	inaccurate or vague outside reference		includes inaccurate and vague outside		20 pts
	examples that fully support the	the explanation provided that are	examples that may or may not lend		reference examples that do
	explanation provided.	accurate.	support for the explanation provided or are		not lend support for the explanation
			misaligned to the explanation provided.		provided, or is missing.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences	17 to >15.0 pts Good The response accurately explains any differences between what they		15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they		13 to >0 pts Poor vaguely explains in detail any differences between what	20 pts

Criteria	Ratings							Pts
decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were	between what they expected to achieve with each		expected to achieve with each of the decisions		expected to achieve with each of the decisions		they expected to achieve with each of the
different. Be specific and provide examples.	of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the		and the results of the decisions in the exercise. …		and the results of the decisions in the exercise……. The		decisions and the results of the decisions in
	exercise……. The response provides		The response provides accurate		response provides inaccurate or		the exercise, or is missing. …
	specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully		examples that support whether there were		vague examples that may or may not support		The response provides inaccurate and
	support whether there were		differences between the		whether there were differences		vague examples that
	differences between the decisions made		decisions made and the decisions available in the		between the decisions made and the decisions		do not support whether there were
	and the decisions available in the		exercise.		available in the exercise.		differences between the
	exercise.						decisions made and the decisions
							available in the exercise, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting –	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent	4 to >3.5 pts Good		3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair		3 to >0 pts Poor		5 pts
Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.	Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.	Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.		Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.		Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Sentences are carefully focused–

Criteria	Ratings							Pts
neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors	4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors		3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors		3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding		5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font,	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors		4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors		3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (3–4) APA format errors		3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
spacing, margins, indentations, page
numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text								5 pts
citations, and reference list.
Total Points: 100

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS 6521 Week 8 Assignment: Pharmacology for Psychological Disorders

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NURS 6521 Week 8 Assignment: Pharmacology for Psychological Disorders