NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE

For this first course Discussion, you will present a philosophy of nursing practice that draws on your experience, area(s) of expertise, and beliefs. Looking ahead to your role as a DNP, also consider how to expand your awareness of issues beyond your own current practice—such as regarding diversity, global health, collaboration—and how to fulfill the Walden requirement to advocate for social change.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In short, begin now to commit to a higher level of contribution and practice as a DNP and to reflect that commitment in your philosophy of nursing practice for today and the future. As you continue through the course, note this image will appear with each Discussion and indicates an opportunity to connect your thinking with that of colleagues, for learning with and from one another.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE:

• Review the Week 1 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the Chapter 1 reading from McEwen and Wills, “Philosophy, Science, and Nursing.”
• Reflect on your nursing experience, expertise you have developed, and beliefs about nursing and nursing practice you have formed as a result.
• Consider how your philosophy of nursing practice is shaped by these elements.
• Consider goals for expanding your professional awareness through the DNP program and the requirement as a Walden student to be an advocate for social change. How can your philosophy of nursing practice support you in these areas? How can these goals and Walden social change requirement enrich your philosophy of nursing practice?

With these thoughts in mind …

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1

Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.

NURS_8002_Week7_Blog_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Main Posting:Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. view longer description	20 to >17 pts Excellent 90%–100% Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). … Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. … No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. 17 to >15 pts Good 80%–89% Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). … Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. … 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. 15 to >13 pts Fair 70%–79% Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). … One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 13 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.	20 / 20 pts
Main Posting:Writing view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Written clearly and concisely. … Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Written concisely. … May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Written somewhat concisely. … May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Comments Review APA and correct capitalization.	3 / 5 pts
Main Posting:Timely and full participation view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts main Blog post by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Posts main Discussion by due date. … Meets requirements for full participation. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts main Blog post by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post main Blog post by due date.	5 / 5 pts
First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response is on topic and may have some depth. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.	5 / 5 pts
First Response:Writing view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas. … Response is written in standard, edited English. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. … Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions is missing. Comments Please see APA for the correct number of authors to be cited.	4 / 5 pts
First Response:Timely and full participation view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.	5 / 5 pts
Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response is on topic and may have some depth. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.	5 / 5 pts
Second Response:Writing view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas. … Response is written in standard, edited English. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. … Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions is missing. Comments Please see APA for correct format (reference and abbreviation). Please review capitalization format.	4 / 5 pts
Second Response:Timely and full participation view longer description	5 to >4 pts Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not pos

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice HERE

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

My philosophy of nursing practice is based on the notion of nurses providing quality, empathetic, compassionate, patient-centered care that is guided by best practice. I identify nursing as a humanistic science devoted to a compassionate course of maintaining and promoting health, preventing diseases, and rehabilitating the sick and disabled. I have a nursing practice experience of 13 years, nine years as an RN, and four years as a PMHNP. From my nursing experience as an RN and NP, I have learned that nurses have a unique contribution to patient care as they help individuals become independent (McEwen & Wills, 2019). I have vast experience in mental health nursing, where I have learned the importance of the nurse promoting patient independence in all health aspects so that the patient can continuously progress after being discharged from the hospital.

The philosophy of nursing practice is driven by my belief that nurses should strive to provide the best patient care possible based on integrity, fairness, and respect. I believe that the nursing practice is based on the value of caring, which involves making patients feel that they matter.  Furthermore, my philosophy is based on the belief in continuous improvement. Consequently, I strive to continuously improve my nursing knowledge and skills and this has greatly contributed to my enrolling in the DNP program. My goals for expanding my experience and practice as a DNP are based on leadership and healthcare policy. I believe that the DNP program will equip me with the knowledge and skills to provide multidisciplinary leadership (Edwards et al., 2018). I also seek to engage in the development of healthcare policies that will foster positive change at different system levels.

The DNP as a social change agent has a role of advocating for social justice. This can be achieved by engaging in advocacy and policy initiatives. As a Walden DNP, I will advocate for positive social change by critically analyzing existing health policies to identify gaps that should be bridged to improve healthcare access and delivery (Rivaz et al., 2021). I will also propose policy amendments or new policies to improve the quality of healthcare in the community I serve.

References

Edwards, N. E., Coddington, J., Erler, C., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2018). The Impact of the Role of Doctor of Nursing Practice Nurses on Healthcare and Leadership. Medical Research Archives, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v6i4.1734

McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.  

Rivaz, M., Shokrollahi, P., Setoodegan, E., & Sharif, F. (2021). Exploring the necessity of establishing a doctor of nursing practice program from experts’ views: a qualitative study. BMC medical education, 21(1), 328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02758-w