NURS 8302 Week 4 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap

NURS 8302 Week 4 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap

NURS 8302 Week 4 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap

TO PREPARE:

Review the Learning Resources for this week, and consider the approaches of project management.

Refer to the Week 3 Discussion, and reflect on the quality improvement practice gap you identified.

Consider how you might apply the project management approaches examined this week to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.

Think about how you might develop SMART objectives for the planning and execution of a project to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8302 Week 4 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Utilize the Walden University writing center setting SMART goals academic guide to develop your goals. This resource includes the SMART goal criteria, example goals, and a template for you to develop your own academic, professional, and personal SMART goals. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/success-strategies/mindset-wellness/smart-goalsLinks to an external site.

Consider any other project management approaches or activities you might recommend using for your project that will address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.

THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)

Briefly describe the quality improvement practice gap you identified in your nursing practice or organization. Be specific.

Develop at least two SMART objectives you might apply in the project planning phase or execution phase to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.

Recommend at least two project management activities you would use for your project, addressing the quality improvement practice gap you identified. Explain your justification for why these activities would provide the best support. Be specific and provide examples

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632)

Links to an external site.

. All papers submitted must use this formatting.

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your

Rubric

NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

25 pts
35 pts
25 pts
5 pts

5 pts

5 pts

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly describes in detail the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization…. The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified.
22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization…. The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization…. The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified.
17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization, or it is missing…. The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Develop at least two SMART objectives you might apply in the project planning phase or execution phase to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely develops two SMART objectives that comprehensively address the quality improvement gap identified.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response accurately develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified.
27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified. OR The response develops less than two SMART objectives.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified, or it is missing.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Recommend at least two project management activities you would use for your project addressing the quality improvement practice gap you identified, and explain your justification for why these activities would provide the best support. Be specific, and provide examples.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly describes in detail two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified.
22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified.
19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified…. OR… The response recommends less than two project management activities. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified.
17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Please find my WEEK 3 DISCUSSION POST BELOW HERE TO USE TO

COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT

MY Main Discussion post week 3

Quality improvement (QI) is a systematic, formal approach to analyzing practice performance and efforts to enhance performance. QI employs a systematic change method and strategies to improve patient experience and outcome (Hamilton et al., 2020). I would identify a QI practice gap by identifying a problem in patient care delivery or patient outcomes. I would then plainly define the outcome that needs to be enhanced, identify how the process outcome will be measured, and create a plan for executing an intervention. I would also create a plan for collecting data before and after the intervention, which will help measure the impact of the QI intervention.

In my current practice setting, I have identified a practice gap in the discharge of patients from the inpatient psychiatric unit. The unit has suboptimal discharge planning, which is linked to poor understanding of and lack of compliance with medical instructions among patients. This leads to decreased treatment compliance, reduced patient safety, increased readmissions, and poor patient satisfaction. I can implement a QI project on safe discharge, which entails discharging patients from the hospital with a plan for continued care after leaving the facility.

The tools I may adopt to address the practice gap include the PDSA and Six Sigma models. The PDSA is a QI process applied to improve a practice or make a change. It is a cyclical four-stage problem-solving process involving dividing a task into steps, evaluating the outcome, improving it, and evaluating it again. The Six Sigma model offers organizations tools to enhance the capacity of their business processes (Niñerola et al., 2020). The outcome is increased performance and reduced process variation that contributes to a reduction in defects and improved employee morale, profits, and quality of services/products.

References

Hamilton, S., Jennings, A., & Forster, A. J. (2020). Development and evaluation of a quality improvement framework for healthcare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(7), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa075

Links to an external site.

Niñerola, A., Sánchez-Rebull, M. V., & Hernández-Lara, A. B. (2020). Quality improvement in healthcare: Six Sigma systematic review. Health Policy, 124(4), 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.002

Links to an external site.