NURS 8310 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS

NURS 8310 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS

NURS 8310 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS

As introduced in the first few weeks of this course, investigators use various epidemiological study designs to study health problems and the effects of health interventions. You have examined several study designs, including descriptive designs (in Week 2) and analytic study designs that are observational (in Week 3) or experimental (this week). As an MSN or DNP student, you should be able to determine which study design would be most suitable for addressing a health problem of interest to you, as this is a foundation for evidence-based practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8310 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

For this Assignment, you will identify an epidemiologic association of interest (e.g., smoking and lung cancer, obesity and heart disease, hormone replacement/modification therapy and breast cancer) and determine an appropriate study design for exploring that association.

For this Assignment, you will identify an epidemiologic association of interest (e.g., smoking and lung cancer, obesity and heart disease, hormone replacement/modification therapy and breast cancer) and determine an appropriate study design for exploring that association.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2020). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (3rd ed.). Springer.

Chapter 2, “Identifying Outcomes in Population-Based Nursing”
Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Chapter 8, “Experimental Study Designs”
Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018). Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationLinks to an external site.. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x

Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (n.d.). Developing researchLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/student-research/developing-research

EXAMPLES OF STUDIES UTILIZING EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY DESIGNS

These studies should be used as informative examples. Please locate another article on your own to use for the Discussion.
Hooshmand, M., & Foronda, C. (2018). Comparison of telemedicine to traditional face-to-face care for children with special needs: A quasiexperimental study. Telemedicine Journal and E-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 24(6), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0116

Sawyer, A., Kaim, A., Le, H.-N., McDonald, D., Mittinty, M., Lynch, J., & Sawyer, M. (2019). The effectiveness of an app-based nurse-moderated program for new mothers with depression and parenting problems (eMums Plus): Pragmatic randomized controlled trialLinks to an external site.. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6), e13689. https://doi.org/10.2196/13689

Optional Resource

Dennis, C. L., Grigoriadis, S., Zupancic, J., Kiss, A., & Ravitz, P. (2020). Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: Nationwide randomised controlled trialLinks to an external site.. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216(4), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.275

TO PREPARE

Consider an association between a risk factor and a particular health outcome that is of interest to you. Table 2.2, in Curley, has some excellent options. You may use this to guide your selection of topics or select your own population health topic.

Then, select an observational OR experimental study design you think would be the most appropriate for exploring this association. You may select from any of the designs covered in this module.

THE ASSIGNMENT

In a 3- to 4-page paper, not including title page and references, address the following:

Briefly identify the population health topic (association between a risk factor and a health outcome) you selected. Present a research question based on this topic that you would like to answer in a proposed study. (Consult the Walden “Developing Research” resource for guidance on crafting a research question.)

Explain the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address your population health problem.

Summarize the data collection activities you would use (i.e., how you would collect data—online survey, paper/pen, mailing, etc.).

Explain any specific methodologic strategies you would use. For example, if you were conducting a case-control study, how would you select your cases and controls?

Consider the methods you would use to make these selections. What are the strengths and limitations of your selected approach?

Explain ethical considerations pertaining to your study.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4

Submit your Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_8310_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8310_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 3- to 4-page paper, not including title page and references, address the following: Briefly identify the population health topic (association between a risk factor and a health outcome) you selected. Present a research question based on this topic that you would like to answer in a proposed study.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately, clearly, and concisely identifies the selected population health problem…. A clear and focused research question appropriate for the population health problem is presented.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies the selected population health problem…. An appropriate research question for the population health problem is presented.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely identifies the selected population health problem…. A somewhat vague research question for the population health problem is presented.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the selected population health problem, or it is missing…. The research question for the population health problem is vague, misaligned, or missing.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address your population health problem.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address the population health problem.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address the population health problem.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely explains the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address the population health problem.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the epidemiologic study design for the population health problem or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the data collection activities you would use (i.e., how you would collect data—online survey, paper/pen, mailing, etc.).
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

A clear and concise summary of selected data collection activities is provided.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

A clear summary of selected data collection activities is provided.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

A somewhat inaccurate or vague summary of selected data collection activities is provided.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague summary of selected data collection activities is provided, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any specific methodologic strategies you would use. For example, if you were conducting a case-control study, how would you select your cases and controls

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and detailed explanation of specific methodologic strategies is provided.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

An accurate explanation of specific methodologic strategies is provided.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of specific methodologic strategies is provided.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague explanation of methodologic strategies is provided, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsider the methods you would use to make these selections. What are the strengths and limitations of your selected approach?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and detailed explanation of strengths and limitations of the selected methodological strategies is provided.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

An accurate explanation of strengths and limitations of the selected methodological strategies is provided.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of strengths and limitations of the selected methodological strategies is provided.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague explanation of strengths and limitations of the selected methodological strategies is provided, or it is missing.

20 pts

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8310 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS HERE

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain ethical considerations pertaining to your study.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and detailed explanation of ethical considerations pertaining to the proposed study is provided.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

An accurate explanation of ethical considerations pertaining to the proposed study is provided.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of ethical considerations pertaining to the proposed study is provided.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague explanation of ethical considerations pertaining to the proposed study is provided, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 150