NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Paper
NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Paper
For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Paper HERE
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Reference
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
Demonstration of Proficiency
- Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
-
- Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
-
- Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
- Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
-
- Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
- Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
-
- Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
- Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
-
- Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
-
- Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
See Also:
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal NURS-FPX4010
Professional Context
This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
Scenario
This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.
For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature.
Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
- Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
- Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
- Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
- Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
- Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Issue Identification
- Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
- Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
- APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Paper Scoring Guide
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
Summarize an | Does not | Discusses an | Summarizes an | Summarizes an interview |
interview focused on | summarize an | interview, but the | interview focused on | focused on past or |
past or current issues | interview focused | focus of the interview, | past or current issues | current issues at a health |
at a health care | on past or current | the issues addressed, | at a health care | care organization. Notes |
organization. | issues at a health | or the specifics of | organization. | strategies employed in |
care organization. | health care | the interview to ensure | ||
organizational context | that sufficient information | |||
are unclear or | was gathered. | |||
missing. | ||||
Identify an issue from | Does not identify | Identifies an issue | Identifies an issue | Identifies an issue from |
an interview for which | an issue from an | with an unclear | from an interview for | an interview for which an |
an evidence-based | interview for which | connection to the | which an evidence- | evidence-based |
interdisciplinary | an evidence-based | interview or for which | based | interdisciplinary |
approach would be | interdisciplinary | an evidence-based | interdisciplinary | approach would be |
appropriate. | approach would be | interdisciplinary | approach would be | appropriate, providing |
appropriate. | approach seems | appropriate. | one or more specific | |
inappropriate. | reasons to justify this | |||
approach. | ||||
Describe potential | Does not describe | Identifies change | Describes potential | Describes potential |
change theories and | potential change | theories and | change theories and | change theories and |
leadership strategies | theories and | leadership strategies | leadership strategies | leadership strategies that |
that could help | leadership | that are unclear, | that could help | could help develop an |
develop an | strategies that | incomplete, or | develop an | interdisciplinary solution |
interdisciplinary | could help develop | irrelevant to | interdisciplinary | to an organizational |
solution to an | an interdisciplinary | developing an | solution to an | issue. Notes which |
organizational issue. | solution to an | interdisciplinary | organizational issue. | sources seem most |
organizational | solution to an | credible or relevant to | ||
issue. | organizational issue. | the specific | ||
organizational issue. | ||||
Describe | Does not describe | Identifies | Describes | Describes collaborative |
collaborative | collaborative | collaborative | collaborative | approaches from the |
approaches from the | approaches from | approaches from the | approaches from the | literature that could be |
literature that could | the literature that | literature but the | literature that could | relevant in establishing |
be relevant in | could be relevant | relevance to | be relevant in | or improving an |
establishing or | in establishing or | establishing or | establishing or | interdisciplinary team to |
improving an | improving an | improving an | improving an | address an |
interdisciplinary team | interdisciplinary | interdisciplinary team | interdisciplinary team | organizational issue. |
to address an | team to address | to address an | to address an | Notes which sources |
organizational issue. | an organizational | organizational issue | organizational issue. | seem most credible or |
issue. | is unclear or | relevant to the specific | ||
insufficiently | organizational issue. | |||
explained. | ||||
Organize content so | Does not organize | Organizes content | Organizes content so | Organizes content with a |
ideas flow logically | content for ideas. | with some logical flow | ideas flow logically | clear purpose. Content |
with smooth | Lacks logical flow | and smooth | with smooth | flows logically with |
transitions; contains | and smooth | transitions. Contains | transitions; contains | smooth transitions using |
few errors in | transitions. | errors in | few errors in | coherent paragraphs, |
grammar/punctuation, | grammar/punctuation, | grammar/punctuation, | correct | |
word choice, and | word choice, and | word choice, and | grammar/punctuation, | |
spelling. | spelling. | spelling. | word choice, and free of | |
spelling errors. | ||||
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
Apply APA formatting | Does not apply | Applies APA | Applies APA | Exhibits strict and |
to in-text citations | APA formatting to | formatting to in-text | formatting to in-text | flawless adherence to |
and references | headings, in-text | citations, headings | citations and | APA formatting of |
exhibiting nearly | citations, and | and references | references, exhibiting | headings, in-text |
flawless adherence to | references. Does | incorrectly and/or | nearly flawless | citations, and references. |
APA format. | not use quotes or | inconsistently, | adherence to APA | Quotes and paraphrases |
paraphrase | detracting noticeable | format. | correctly. | |
correctly. | from the content. | |||
Inconsistently uses | ||||
headings, quotes | ||||
and/or paraphrasing. |