Personal Legislative Agenda Essay

Personal Legislative Agenda Essay

Personal Legislative Agenda Essay

To adequately address the pressing need for smoking cessation assistance among COPD patients in North Carolina, it is essential to implement a comprehensive policy change. The main goal of this policy change is to make smoking cessation programs more available and accessible for individuals with COPD, especially younger people at a greater risk of developing COPD (Stridsman et al., 2020). The goal of the strategy is to put in place measures that help smokers who have COPD while encouraging them to stop and ensuring that smoke-free settings are created. By actively encouraging smoking cessation initiatives and establishing smoke-free environments, we can effectively strike an appropriate balance between individual choice regarding tobacco use and promoting healthy lifestyles. The proposed agenda delineates crucial steps and strategies for advancing this policy through the legislative process in North Carolina while emphasizing effective communication techniques, evidence-based practices, and collaboration amongst pertinent stakeholders.

Critical Components for the policy change

Raising Awareness

A thorough public education program will be developed and implemented across the state to raise awareness and gather support. This campaign aims to make people with COPD more aware of the health risks that come with smoking. It also aims to provide information on how to quit smoking. (Williams, 2020). One effective strategy to promote smoking cessation among COPD patients is the implementation of public education campaigns. So, these campaigns are designed to make people more aware of how important it is to quit smoking. They want to emphasize the benefits of quitting in the long run, like how it can change COPD’s progression and prevent lung function from worsening.

Gathering Support

Strong collaborations and collaboration with healthcare providers, community organizations, and public health authorities are essential to efficiently reaching a large audience. Utilizing several multimedia platforms, such as radio, television, and social media, can help achieve this. Advocacy organizations and politicians can better shape policy decisions by involving critical stakeholders like COPD patients and healthcare professionals like pharmacists in the decision-making process (Lertsinudom et al., 2021). The collaborative approach ensures the development of methods for interacting with the target audience, which allows for the consideration of a wide variety of perspectives. Integrating those who have experience working with COPD patients or engaged in policymaking related to respiratory disorders further strengthens the legitimacy of these initiatives.

Establishing smoke-free environments

Smoke-free regulations will require public spaces, such as parks, beaches, outdoor seating areas, and public transportation stations, to be free from smoking. The focus will be on raising awareness about the detrimental health effects of secondhand smoke, specifically for individuals with COPD (Chen et al., 2022). It is essential to highlight the benefits of providing smoke-free environments to everyone. Offering incentives like tax breaks or recognition programs can motivate private establishments such as restaurants, bars, and businesses to adopt smoke-free policies willingly. A certification program will also be developed to acknowledge and promote establishments that successfully implement and maintain these policies.

Smoking cessation programs and resources

Expanding access to evidence-based smoking cessation programs is crucial to enhance further efforts in supporting smoking cessation. This can be achieved through collaborations with healthcare providers and insurance companies, ensuring sufficient coverage for the necessary treatments and medications required for effective smoking cessation (Ahmed et al., 2021). A targeted awareness campaign must also be explicitly developed, addressing available resources for individuals with COPD who want to quit smoking. Collaboration between healthcare professionals and community organizations will be pivotal in distributing educational materials, organizing workshops, and providing information on helplines and online resources. By working together, we can effectively spread knowledge about the various support systems available to those looking to quit smoking.

Integration of Smoking Cessation into Healthcare Systems

Smoking cessation programs must be integrated into the healthcare system for a more complete approach. Smoking cessation should be routinely included in COPD patient care to improve health outcomes and quit smoking (Sanduni Madawala et al., 2023). Clinical practice guidelines must consist of smoking cessation strategies for this integration. These guidelines should outline effective smoking cessation and relapse prevention methods. Healthcare practitioners should also be trained in these evidence-based methods to help patients quit smoking. Healthcare professionals should emphasize smoking cessation treatment compliance among COPD patients (Qin et al., 2021). Updates and continued education will help them address COPD smokers’ unique concerns. Provide follow-up care, continuing assistance, guideline implementation, and healthcare professional training. This could involve nicotine replacement therapy or other pharmacological treatments proven useful in tobacco dependence treatment. After a systematic program, smoking cessation therapy would be helpful.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Legislative process plan

The process of drafting a comprehensive bill to address smoke-free environments and smoking cessation support can be divided into several essential steps:

• Bill development: Legal experts and policymakers should be involved to ensure that the proposed legislation is aligned with existing laws and adheres to constitutional requirements.
• Legislative support: It is crucial to gather support from legislators by presenting them with evidence-based research on the harmful effects of smoking and statistical data highlighting the burden of COPD. Testimonials from individuals personally affected by COPD could also help sway their opinion. For the bill to gain traction and garner sponsorship, collaboration with influential legislators is essential (Natow, 2022). Building relationships with these key stakeholders will increase their likelihood of championing this cause.
• Committee hearings and advocacy: Once drafted, presenting the bill to relevant committees for review allows for discussion about any concerns or considerations raised by committee members. During advocacy efforts at this stage, it would be beneficial to provide compelling evidence supporting smoke-free environments while addressing potential objections or reservations by committee members.
• Coalition Building and Advocacy: Coalition building is crucial in strengthening advocacy efforts. By collaborating closely with healthcare organizations, advocacy groups, and other stakeholders, we can strengthen our collective voice and increase our impact when advocating for the passage of this bill. A targeted lobbying strategy that includes contacts with lawmakers, distributing informational materials, and planning events will win support.

Conclusion

This document outlines a comprehensive plan addressing smoking cessation assistance for individuals with COPD in North Carolina. The strategy includes promoting the implementation of programs to help individuals quit smoking, establishing smoke-free environments, and integrating smoking cessation into healthcare systems. Our goal is to balance personal preferences and maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The primary elements of this agenda involve increasing Awareness through a statewide public education campaign, enacting regulations that prohibit smoking in public spaces, expanding access to evidence-based smoking cessation programs, and integrating these efforts into existing healthcare systems. If we work with stakeholders, communicate effectively with legislators, and use smart advocacy strategies, we can progress with this policy in the legislative process. By implementing these measures, we can make a big difference in the lives of COPD patients who still smoke. Not only that, but it will also help create healthier communities all across North Carolina.

References

Ahmed, N. J., Gabr, G. A., & El-Sherbiny, A. A. (2021). The frequency of prescribing nicotine and varenicline in a public hospital. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i55a33809

Chen, J., Yin, Y., Zhang, Y., Lin, X., Chen, T., Yang, Z., Wang, D., & Zhong, W. (2022). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence and associated risk factors in adults aged 40 years and older in southeast China: A cross-sectional study during 2019–2020. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 17, 2317–2328. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S377857

Lertsinudom, S., Kaewketthong, P., Chankaew, T., Chinwong, D., & Chinwong, S. (2021). Smoking cessation services by community pharmacists: Real-World practice in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211890

Natow, R. (2022). Understanding higher education bill success in the united states congress. The Review of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0181

Qin, R., Liu, Z., Zhou, X., Cheng, A., Cui, Z., Li, J., Wei, X., Xiao, D., & Wang, C. (2021). Adherence and efficacy of smoking cessation treatment among patients with COPD in China. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Volume 16, 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s301579

Sanduni Madawala, Warren, N., Osadnik, C., & Barton, C. (2023). The primary care experience of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An interpretative phenomenological inquiry. 18(6), e0287518–e0287518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287518

Stridsman, C., Konradsen, J. R., Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren, Christophe Pedroletti, Binnmyr, J., Edfelt, P., K. Fjällman Schärberg, Sjöö, Y., Nyberg, F., Lindberg, A. A., Alf Tunsäter, & Ekberg-Jansson, A. (2020). The Swedish national airway register (SNAR): Development, design and utility to date. 7(1), 1833412–1833412. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1833412

Williams, P. T. (2020). Spirometric traits show quantile-dependent heritability, which may contribute to their gene-environment interactions with smoking and pollution. PeerJ, 8, e9145. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9145

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

WEEK 5-7 ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS (DUE WEEK 7)
PERSONAL LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
How can you move a policy forward? What strategies need to be implemented, evidence compiled, or resources utilized? What is the plan for the legislative process?
For this Assignment, you will create a Personal Legislative Agenda in which you will detail your strategy for moving your policy through the legislative process.
Begin working in Week 5; it is not due until Week 7.
LEARNING RESOURCES TO ASSIST WITH ASSIGNMENT
• Dawes, D. E. (2020). The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.
o Chapter 5, “Wining the Game That Never Ends: Success Means Continuous Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 112–130)
• Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
o Chapter 12, “Evidence Informing Policymaking ” (pp. 175–183)
o Chapter 15, “Politics: Theory and Practice” (pp. 201–237)
• Document: Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)Download Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)
• Alliance for Strong Families and Communities. (2019). Policy, advocacy, and communications toolkit. https://alliance1.org/web/resources/pubs/policy-advocacy-communications-toolkit.aspx
• Association of Public Health Nurses Public Health Policy Committee. (2021). Public health policy advocacy guidebook and tool kitLinks to an external site.. https://www.phnurse.org/assets/docs/APHN%20Public%20Health%20Policy%20Advocacy%20Guidebook%20and%20Toolkit%20_May%202021.pdf
• Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/
• Congress.gov. (2022). State legislative websitesLinks to an external site. [Interactive media]. https://www.congress.gov/state-legislature-websites
• Gustafson, A. (2017, December 12). How to be a political influence—as an average citizen. CurrentsLinks to an external site.. https://smea.uw.edu/currents/how-to-be-a-political-influence-as-an-average-citizen/
• Rees, A. (2013, August 6). Digital and online activismLinks to an external site.. Reset: Digital for Good. https://en.reset.org/digital-and-online-activism/
• White, N. (2018). Introduction: Why read the Effective Activist Guide. In Effective activist: An evidence-based guide to progressive social changeLinks to an external site. (pp. 6–10). Effective Activist. https://effectiveactivist.com/intro/
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS:
Submit a Personal Legislative Agenda detailing your strategy for moving your policy through the legislative process, using the Personal Legislative and Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar as your template.
In your Personal Legislative Agenda, choose from the strategies provided in Advocacy Toolkit resource that best suite moving your policies forward. Be sure to connect the strategies to the appropriate sections of the policy model you selected in Module 2.
PLEASE PROVIDE HEADINGS FOR EACH TOPIC WITH DETAILS AND EXAMPLES.
GRADING RUBRIC:
NURS_8100_Week5-7_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_8100_Week5-7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the proposed legislation with a clear summary/description and process and update information (the first three columns of the Personal Legislative Action Plan). 20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the prosed legislation with all pertinent detail: summary/description and process and update information. 17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response clearly describes the prosed legislation with all pertinent detail: summary/description and process and update information. 15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the prosed legislation with all pertinent detail: summary/description and process and update information. 13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not describe the prosed legislation with all pertinent detail: summary/description and process and update information, or it is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your advocacy actions (the fourth column of the Personal Legislative Action Plan). 25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes your advocacy actions. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the advocacy actions. 22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response clearly describes your advocacy actions. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the advocacy actions. 19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes your advocacy actions. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the advocacy actions. 17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes your advocacy actions, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the advocacy actions, or it is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssesses the current status of the proposed legislation (the fifth column of the Personal Legislative Action Plan). 20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and fully details the current status of the proposed legislation. 17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response clearly details the current status of the proposed legislation. 15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely details the current status of the proposed legislation. 13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the current status of the proposed legislation, or it is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain next steps (the sixth column of the Personal Legislative Action Plan). 20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains next steps for the proposed legislation. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support next steps. 17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains next steps for the proposed legislation. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the next steps. 15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains next steps for the proposed legislation. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the next steps. 13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains next steps for the proposed legislation, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the next steps, or it is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext