PH 4004 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing
PH 4004 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing
Part 1: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Short Answer
Respond to the following questions in the table provided.
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
PH 4004 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
| Why should evidence be used when designing interventions in public health nursing? |
| Evidence should be used when designing interventions in public health nursing to ensure accuracy and provide a source and guideline for implementation. Evidence-based practice(EBPH) has several benefits including to higher quality information on efficiency, successful agendas and policies being implemented, greater workforce production, and more proficient use of resources (BROWNSON et al., 2018).
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PH 4004 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing HEREGood News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us |
| How does evidence-based practice in public health nursing differ from evidence-based practice in acute care? |
| Evidence-based practice in public health differs from evidence-based practice in acute care from focused on an aimed population in the community. According to Vanagas (2017), “EBPH can be defined as a process of integrating evidence from scientific research and practice to improve the health of the target population.” When using evidence-based practice in acute care, the focus is wide-ranging and can help provide safe practices in multiple fields of healthcare.
|
Part 2: Evaluating and Selecting Appropriate Evidence
Locate five sources of evidence that discuss interventions for the public health problem you identified in PH4002. You can find scholarly articles in the Walden Library and find evidence housed within the Community Guide as a starting point for your search. You can also use one scholarly resource from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, or other reputable health websites.
- Use APA style for your citations.
- For each of your sources, perform a systematic review: summarize the information, and describe the interventions and strategies used and the effectiveness of each strategy.
- Comment on the key characteristics of the evidence that would be appropriate for the population identified in your public health problem. Be sure to consider the social determinants of health, the cultural factors that apply, and any other specific observations regarding your population and community.
- The following website can serve as a guide in selecting and evaluating resources: National Institutes of Health. (2016, April). Introduction to evidence based public health information resources https://www.nihlibrary.nih.gov/sites/default/files/evidencebasedpublichealthslides.pdf
| Source 1 (APA citation)
Nelson, L. A., Ackerman, M. T., Greevy Jr, R. A., Wallston, K. A., & Mayberry, L. S. (2019). Beyond race disparities: accounting for socioeconomic status in diabetes self-care. American journal of preventive medicine, 57(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.013
|
|||
| Summary
In this research, Nelson et al. (2019) examine how various socioeconomic status indicators such as education, health insurance, health literacy and numeracy, and financial strain increase racial disparities in the occurrence of diabetes.
|
Strategies Used | Effectiveness of the Strategies | Application to Your Population and Health Problem
|
| Source 2 (APA citation)
Haw, J. S., Shah, M., Turbow, S., Egeolu, M., & Umpierrez, G. (2021). Diabetes Complications in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in the USA. Current diabetes reports, 21(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-020-01369-x
|
|||
| Summary
In this review, Haw et al. (2021) explore various causes of complications associated with diabetes among the racial minority populations in the country. The journal article discusses healthcare utilization and the adoption of diabetes prevention among this population, which will help analyze the delayed diagnosis of the disease among black college students.
|
Strategies Used | Effectiveness of the Strategies | Application to Your Population and Health Problem
|
| Source 3 (APA citation)
Raveendran, A. V., Chacko, E. C., & Pappachan, J. M. (2018). Non-pharmacological treatment options in the management of diabetes mellitus. European endocrinology, 14(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.17925%2FEE.2018.14.2.31
|
|||
| Summary
In this article, Raveendran et al. (2018) explore non-pharmacological ways of managing diabetes and their effectiveness. The suggested strategies include healthy nutrition, dieting, physical activities, and proper sleeping habits. This article is essential in the final project as it will provide a framework to develop practical strategies that nurse educators can use to equip college students to reduce the prevalence of diabetes.
|
Strategies Used
This article used a Double-blind peer review to gather data regarding non-pharmacological strategies in treating diabetes type 1 and diabetes type 2 and using evidenced-based practice to explore implementation and results.
|
Effectiveness of the Strategies
This article concluded that the effectiveness in increased physical activity and bariatric procedures has decreased glycemic control and improved health outcomes in the diabetes population |
Application to Your Population and Health Problem
This article will benefit my project by providing non-pharmacologic resources to my targeted population.
|
| Source 4 (APA citation)
Sarker, A., Das, R., Ether, S., & Saif-Ur-Rahman, K. M. (2020). Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Systematic reviews, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01550-z
|
|||
| Summary
In this systematic review, Sarker et al. (2020) suggest that increased physical activity and a balanced diet are crucial and effective measures to reduce the occurrence of diabetes mellitus. These researchers acknowledge the increased number of diabetes cases among the younger population. |
Strategies Used
Six online databases were analyzed to get related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to September 2020 to screen, identify, collect data, and assess each article. Joanna Briggs Institute’s tool for RCTs were used for appraising the trials. Narrative synthesis and pooled effect of the interventions were demonstrated. A meta-analysis was conducted.
|
Effectiveness of the Strategies
The article showed effectiveness of using non-pharmacological strategy in preventing and managing diabetes should improve by the year 2033. |
Application to Your Population and Health Problem
This review will significantly contribute to the final project because it provides ways of preventing and managing diabetes that can be applied in school settings.
|
| Source 5 (APA citation)
|
|||
| Summary | Strategies Used | Effectiveness of the Strategies | Application to Your Population and Health Problem
|
| Prioritize your sources according to usefulness for your selected population.
|
|||
Part 3: Synthesizing Evidence
| Based on the information gathered within your annotated bibliography, write a 2- to 3-page paper that synthesizes your sources using your own words and ideas. You may want to consider using a synthesis matrix or another tool to guide you in your synthesis of the sources. The Walden University Writing Center contains information that could be helpful to you. It can be found at: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis. Your paper should include the following:
· An introduction, including an expanded and developed statement of the health problem in the community. · An explanation of your findings from evaluating and synthesizing your sources, noting the following: o Key similarities and differences in terms of the interventions used in each of your sources, as well as how effective these interventions were in mitigating the problem o Connections between your sources o What worked and what did not o What you learned o Your initial recommendations for the intervention plan you will design in PH4005 · A conclusion offering an overview of your findings
|
| [Insert your paper here.]
|
| Reference List
Vanagas, G., Bala, M., & Lhachimi, S. K. (2017). Evidence-based public health 2017. BioMed Research International, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2607397
Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Deshpande, A. D., & Gillespie, K. N. (2018). Evidence-based public health (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
|
PH4004: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing: Synthesize sources of information to inform public health nursing interventions.
Assessment Rubric
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| Module 1: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health | |||
| Explain why it is important to use evidence when designing a public health nursing intervention.
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain the importance of using evidence when designing public health nursing interventions |
Response does not adequately explain why it is important to use evidence when designing a public health nursing intervention. | Response adequately explains why it is important to use evidence when designing a public health nursing intervention. | Response clearly and completely explains why it is important to use evidence when designing a public health nursing intervention. |
| Explain the difference between evidence-based practice in public health nursing and acute care.
Learning Objective 1.2: Compare evidence- based practice in public health nursing and acute care |
Response does not adequately explain the difference between evidence-based practice in public health nursing and acute care. | Response adequately explains the difference between evidence-based practice in public health nursing and acute care. | Response clearly and completely explains the difference between evidence-based practice in public health nursing and acute care. |
| Summarize the findings of sources. | Response does not adequately summarize the findings of sources. | Response adequately summarizes the finding of sources. | Response clearly and completely summarizes the findings of sources. |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| Learning Objective 1.3: Summarize research studies | |||
| Analyze the key characteristics of the evidence that are appropriate for the population and your health problem.
Learning Objective 1.4: Analyze characteristics of research studies that apply directly to specific populations and health problems |
Response does not adequately analyze the key characteristics of the evidence that are appropriate for the population and health problem. | Response adequately analyzes the key characteristics of the evidence that are appropriate for the population and health problem. | Response clearly and completely analyzes the key characteristics of the evidence that are appropriate for the population and health problem. |
| Module 2: Selecting and Evaluating Appropriate Evidence | |||
| Prioritize the sources in your annotated bibliography according to usefulness for your selected population.
Learning Objective 2.1: Prioritize sources of evidence |
Response does not adequately prioritize the sources in the annotated bibliography according to usefulness for the selected population. | Response adequately prioritizes the sources in the annotated bibliography according to usefulness for the selected population. | Response thoughtfully and accurately prioritizes the sources in the annotated bibliography according to usefulness for the selected population. |
| Compare interventions used in multiple sources of evidence.
Learning Objective 2.2: Compare interventions used |
Response does not adequately compare interventions used in multiple sources of evidence. | Response adequately compares interventions used in multiple sources of evidence. | Response thoughtfully and completely compares interventions used in multiple sources of evidence. |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| in multiple sources of evidence | |||
| Synthesize the information in multiple sources.
Learning Objective 2.3: Synthesize information from multiple sources |
Response does not adequately synthesize the information in multiple sources. | Response adequately synthesizes the information in multiple sources. | Response thoughtfully and completely synthesizes the information in multiple sources. |
| Recommend interventions for the public health problem.
Learning Objective 2.4: Recommend interventions for public health problems |
Response does not adequately recommend interventions for the public health problem. | Response adequately recommends interventions for the public health problem. | Response thoughtfully and clearly recommends interventions for the public health problem. |
Professional Skills Assessment
| Professional Writing | |||
| Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. |
Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could | Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well organized. |
| benefit from additional editing/revision. | |||
| Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free from bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context
and reflects the need for additional editing. |
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. | Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. |
| Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are numerous and/or significant
errors. |
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor
errors. |
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
PH 4004 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Nursing
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!