PH 4005 Assignment: Evidence-Based Intervention Plan

PH 4005 Assignment: Evidence-Based Intervention Plan

PH 4005 Assignment: Evidence-Based Intervention Plan

Overview
For this Performance Task, you will prepare a presentation that details research about a public health problem in your community and presents a plan for how it can be prevented at the primary level of prevention with a focus on the system level of care. Your presentation will include work you have completed in PH4002, PH4003, and PH4004 and focus on mitigating determinants of health that are “upstream.” You will also solicit feedback on your plan from one healthcare professional, analyze the feedback by preparing a summary paper, and then incorporate that feedback into your intervention plan.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PH 4005 Assignment: Evidence-Based Intervention Plan HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Submission Length: 14- to 19-slide PowerPoint presentation and a 1- to 2-page reflection paper

Instructions
To complete this Assessment, do the following:

Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length.
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
Assessment Practicum Presentation Template
Assessment Evaluation Form
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the SME will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.

Your response to this Performance Task should reflect the criteria provided in the rubric and adhere to the required length. This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files: the practicum presentation and the reflection essay. Save the practicum presentation as PH4005_PracticumPresentation_ firstinitial_lastname (for example, PH4005_PracticumPresentation_J_Smith). Save the reflection essay as PH4005_ReflectionEssay_ firstinitial_lastname (for example, PH4005_ReflectionEssay_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Practicum Presentation
Your practicum presentation is the culmination of all the work you have accomplished so far in this Area of Expertise. You will include a presentation of all your synthesized research about a health problem in your community, a plan for how to intervene, and a plan for how to evaluate your intervention. Your presentation will include information you developed in PH4002, PH4003, and PH4004. Use the following guide to create your presentation and essay:

For the first three sections of your presentation, use the Practicum Presentation Template to synthesize information that you prepared in PH4002, PH4003, and PH4004. Include the following:

Defining the Health Problem

Describe and quantify the health problem (2–3 slides)
Summarize information gathered from the community assessment (2–3 slides)
Synthesize and evaluate the literature (2–3 slides)
Developing an Intervention Plan (6–7 slides)

Use the research you completed for PH4002, PH4003, and PH4004 to develop your own intervention plan. Include the following:

A description of your intervention plan
An outline of the steps that you would take to implement your intervention plan
An explanation of the social and cultural characteristics that you took into consideration when developing your intervention plan
An explanation of how your intervention plan addresses risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources for the health problem in your community
An explanation of the possible barriers to implementing the intervention plan
Developing a Plan to Evaluate Success (2–3 slides)

Finally, develop a plan that you can use to evaluate an intervention’s success. Include the following:

A description of criteria that can be used to benchmark successful interventions
An explanation of specific goals for the evaluation of the intervention
Include 1–2 slides that list the resources used in your intervention plan and evaluation plan.

Presenting Your Intervention Plan

The next step in this Assessment is to present your entire PowerPoint presentation to at least one healthcare professional in the community (preferably one with whom you collaborated initially) and ask them for their help in improving your intervention plan. Before you begin your presentation, hand out the Feedback Form to the attendee(s) and ask them to fill it out as you present. After your presentation, collect the form(s), read through the comments, and incorporate the feedback into your reflection paper. These forms should be scanned and inserted at the end of your reflection paper.

Reflecting on Your Plan

Based on the feedback from your presentation, write a 1- to 2-page essay that addresses the following:

A list of the changes you could make to your intervention plan in response to the feedback you received about your presentation
An explanation of how your intervention might be enhanced through the feedback
A list of ways you could implement your intervention in the community by collaborating with other nurses, healthcare professionals, government representatives, or community leaders

PH4005: Evidence-Based Intervention Plan: Create an evidence-based primary intervention plan at the system level in collaboration with health leaders to improve the health of a population in your community.

Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Primary Prevention at the Population Level
PowerPoint: Describe a primary prevention-level intervention plan to prevent a selected public health problem at the system level.	Response does not adequately describe a primary prevention-level intervention plan to prevent a selected public health problem at the system level.	Response adequately describes a primary prevention-level intervention plan to prevent a selected public health problem at the system level.	Response clearly and completely describes a primary prevention-level intervention plan to prevent a selected public health problem at the system level.
Learning Objective 1.1: Describe primary prevention-level interventions
PowerPoint: Describe the steps to implement the intervention plan.	Response does not adequately describe the steps to implement the intervention plan.	Response adequately describes the steps to implement the intervention plan.	Response clearly and completely describes the steps to implement the intervention plan.
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe steps to implement intervention plans
PowerPoint: Analyze social	Response does not	Response adequately	Response thoughtfully and
and cultural considerations	adequately analyze social	analyzes social and	completely analyzes social
that need to be factored	and cultural considerations	cultural considerations that	and cultural considerations
into the interventions.	that need to be factored	need to be factored into the	that need to be factored
	into the interventions.	interventions.	into the interventions.

 

 

Rubric Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations
Learning Objective 1.3: Analyze social and cultural considerations relating to public health interventions
PowerPoint: Explain the ways the intervention plan addresses risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources.	Response does not adequately explain the ways the intervention plan addresses risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources.	Response adequately explains the ways the intervention plan addresses risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources.	Response clearly and completely explains the ways the intervention plan addresses risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources.
Learning Objective 1.4: Explain the ways intervention plans address risk factors, social determinants, upstream factors, and access to resources
PowerPoint: Describe possible barriers to implementation.	Response does not adequately describe possible barriers to implementation.	Response adequately describes possible barriers to implementation.	Response clearly and completely describes possible barriers to implementation.
Learning Objective 1.5: Describe barriers to implementation
Module 2: Program Management and Evaluation

 

Rubric Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations
PowerPoint: Develop criteria for how the program will be evaluated.	Response does not adequately develop criteria for how the program will be evaluated.	Response adequately develops criteria for how the program will be evaluated.	Response thoughtfully and completely develops criteria for how the program will be evaluated.
Learning Objective 2.1: Develop program evaluation plans
PowerPoint: Develop goals for program evaluation.   Learning Objective 2.2: Develop goals for program evaluation	Response does not adequately develop goals for program evaluation.	Response adequately develops goals for program evaluation.	Response develops clear, thoughtful, and complete goals for program evaluation.
PowerPoint: Support the presentation with credible evidence.	Response does not adequately support the presentation with credible evidence.	Response adequately supports the presentation with credible evidence.	Response clearly and completely supports the presentation with credible evidence.
Learning objective 2.3: Identify credible sources of evidence
Module 3: Collaboration With Community Health Leaders
Paper: Solicit feedback	Response does not adequately solicit feedback from at least one other healthcare professional to improve intervention or does not adequately describe ways to incorporate the intervention in the community while	Response adequately solicits feedback from at least one other healthcare professional to improve intervention and adequately describes ways that to incorporate the intervention in the community while working	Response clearly and completely solicits feedback from at least one other healthcare professional to improve intervention and thoughtfully and comprehensively describes ways to incorporate the
from at least one other
healthcare professional to
improve intervention and
thoughtfully consider
changes based on the
feedback.

 

Rubric Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations
Describe ways that you could incorporate your intervention in the community while working with other nurses, healthcare professionals, government representatives, or community leaders.     Learning Objective 3.1: Collaborate with others to improve public health interventions	working with other nurses, healthcare professionals, government representatives, or community leaders.	with other nurses, healthcare professionals, government representatives, or community leaders.	intervention in the community while working with other nurses, healthcare professionals, government representatives, or community leaders.

 

Professional Skills Assessment

 

Professional Writing
Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization	Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented	Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could	Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well organized.

 

	content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.	benefit from additional editing/revision.
Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone	Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free from bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.	Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.	Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.
Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas	Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are numerous and/or significant errors.	Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.	Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.