PHI 413 Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Paper

Religion and spirituality are critical factors in the lives of many people seeking medical care as they are part of providing cultural-competent and patient-centered care. Based on the four principles of biomedical ethics that include autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, it is essential for healthcare providers to consider the spiritual and religious concerns and needs of their patients (Sabo, 2021). The purpose of this paper is a case study involving a parent postponing the treatment of his son who has been diagnosed with acute glomerulonephritis (kidney failure). The decisions that the parents make are based on their spiritual and religious grounds but seem medically harmful to the minor. The paper evaluates the situation by a considering a host of factors; from the biomedical ethical principles to Christian perspective on the issue.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Allowing Mike to Continue Making Decisions that Seem Irrational and Harmful to James

The principle of autonomy obligates physicians to respect patient decisions and choices after providing them with necessary information about their conditions and possible treatment interventions. Patient autonomy entails the rights of a patient to make decisions about their medical care and treatment without the undue influence from the healthcare providers (Sabo, 2021). The case presented involves a minor who legally is incompetent to make decisions and relies on the parents to determine what happens to him. James parents, Mike and Joanne make decisions concerning the course of his treatment. Here, the principle of patient autonomy is important as the physician should allow Mike to make whatever decision he deems fit for his son, like the choice to forego dialysis in the first instance.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

PHI 413 Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Paper

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Research is categorical that patient autonomy allows healthcare providers to educate patients in a better way and enable them make better decisions (Zhou et al., 2019). While the physician has an ethical obligation to respect the decisions by James’ parents, he should use his expertise to educate the family on the risks of foregoing the recommended medical procedures, like the kidney transplant to save the boy’s life. The physician should be emphatic that foregoing medical interventions like the dialysis and even the recommended kidney transplant in hope of miracles is irrational and harmful to the quality of life of the boy. The physician should provide a medical and scientific account of the impact of such decisions on the boy for the parents to appreciate the magnitude of the problem (Paris et al., 2018). Through the approach, the physician will enable the parents to make decisions from an informed perspective. However, the physician should not impose anything on Mike, even in situations where their decisions are not rational to the overall health of James. The physician should keep to the biomedical principle of patient autonomy and use the rational theory to allow them make decisions.

Christian Perspectives on Sickness and Health & Medical Interventions

Religion and spirituality are critical elements in healthcare and impact patient’s perspective on treatment interventions. Christians look at sickness and health from a religious perspective, especially based on one’s level of spiritual growth. Christians look at sickness as a consequence of sin and disobedience to God. Christians also consider sickness as testing one’s faith and resolve in God. Further, health is a sign of God’s blessings and allows individuals to witness the goodness of being a believer. However, Christians ought to consider sickness and health differently (Sabo, 2021). They should look at sickness as a natural occurrence that requires medical interventions and remedies. Further, they not consider health as the only blessing from God but an attempt by individuals to maintain a balance in life. Sickness reiterates the need to care for those suffering and reaffirms their obligation to get close to God and Jesus.

Christian should not be against medical interventions as they are called to accept science and its biomedical uses. Medical interventions are scientific approaches to reduce and even eliminate unnecessary suffering that individuals endure in life. Medical interventions used along prayers lead to healing and restoration of health (Zhou et al., 20119). God has given people intelligence and through this, they discover medical interventions to cure diseases and alleviate suffering. Therefore, Christians should consider medical knowledge and expertise as God’s gift to humanity. Jesus implored his disciples to seek medical interventions (Mathew 9:12, NIV). Christians need to understand that seeking medical intervention does not mean that one lacks faith but a ways of respecting God’s command to seek medical care when sick.

On his part, Mike need to maintain his faith in God that he has power to heal his son. Christians believe in God’s power to health the sick and restore health. Mike should allow his son to undergo the medical intervention while trusting in God that He will use the physicians to restore his health (Sabo, 2021). Mike should use the information given by the physicians and figure out the most effective way to alleviate the suffering that his son endures (Paris et al., 2018). The most appropriate approach is for him to allow James undergo the recommended medical interventions that include a kidney transplant.

Honoring the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence implores the parents to allow James to have the medical intervention as recommended by the physician and the team. Beneficence implies doing greater good and ensuring that all actions and decisions by healthcare provider are in the best interests of a patient. Non-maleficence implies that healthcare providers should not perform actions that intentionally harm a patient (Zhou et al., 2019). Mike should reason that the physician does not recommend the interventions to harm James but doing so is the best interest of his health. Therefore, he should allow the son to undergo the suggested procedures.

Spiritual Needs Analysis

Considering a patient’s spiritual needs is an essential part of providing effective and holistic care. The main goal of a spiritual needs assessment is to enable a healthcare provider support a patient by integrating their religious beliefs, values, norms, and concerns to enhance quality outcomes. Spiritual needs are a critical component of patient-centered and evidence-based practice (EBP) care, especially when dealing with patients from diverse sociocultural and economic backgrounds (Timmins & Caldeira, 2017). The assessment is critical as it allows a patient to leverage the existing spiritual resources to improve their overall wellness and perspective on health interventions.

Conducting a spiritual assessment before treatment of a patient enables the healthcare provider to develop a therapeutic rapport and alliance with the patients while providing a chance for renewal, resiliency, growth and a positive attitude to their health condition that are important in health restoration (Isaac et al., 2018). The implication is that satisfying the spiritual needs of a patient is the basis of holistic care. Carrying out a spiritual assessment is complex, especially in this case where the individual with the problem is a minor yet the person making decisions is the parent.

Physicians may not be the best placed to conduct a spiritual analysis on Mike based on the decisions that he is making. The physician should refer Mike to a chaplain who can help determine effective interventions to help Mike reach better decisions for the sake of James. However, the physician can use tools like HOPE and FICA frameworks. These tools have tests that will allow the physicians to develop a rapport with Mike and incorporate his religious preferences in James’ care plan.

Conclusion

The case study on “Healing and Autonomy” shows that Christians have different perspectives on aspects like healing and medical interventions. The paper demonstrates the need for physicians to adhere to biomedical principles and enable patients to make decisions based on autonomy without any undue influence. A spiritual needs assessment is critical in evaluating a patient’s perspective concerning the recommended treatment intervention

References

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2018) Incorporating Spirituality in primary Care. Journal of

Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2

Paris, W., Seidler, R. J. H., FitzGerald, K., Padela, A. I., Cozzi, E., & Cooper, D. K. (2018).

Jewish, Christian and Muslim theological perspectives about xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation, 25(3), e12400. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12400.

Sabo, A. (2021). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making

In Health Care (1st Edition). Grand Canyon University – Digital Resources.

Timmins, F., & Caldeira, S. (2017). Assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Nursing standard,

31(29): 47-53. doi: 10.7748/ns. 2017.e10312.

Zhou, S. K., Rueckert, D., & Fichtinger, G. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of medical image

computing and computer assisted intervention. Academic Press.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE

Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care
PHI-413V

3 Credits

Course Description
This course introduces a Christian foundation for spiritual assessment and care with specific emphasis on biomedical ethical principles and ethical decision-making within nursing practice. Learners practice assessment and propose holistic interventions that take into account the dignity of the human person. These assessments and interventions contribute to the physical and spiritual well-being of individuals across the life span and the health-illness continuum.
Class Materials
Class Resources
Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work
Read the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” from Grand Canyon University’s One Foundation

https://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/Statement-IFLW.pdf
The Bible
This course requires the use of a Bible. Students should use one of the following versions: the English Standard Version (ESV), the New International Version (NIV), or the New American Standard Bible (NASB). Each of these versions is available in print and also for free at BibleGateway.com.

Students might also find it helpful to choose a study Bible such as the NIV Life Application Study Bible or the ESV Study Bible in order to take advantage of additional information.

College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual
Review the “Bachelor of Science in Nursing (RN to BSN)” section, found in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual (2018-2019), located in the Student Success Center.

LopesWrite
Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.

https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite
Introduction to Philosophical Writing
View the “Introduction to Philosophical Writing” video to help inform your philosophical writing assignments throughout the course.

https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi403/philosophical-writing/v1.1/
Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions
View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith and Dr. Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions.

https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC
GCU Doctrinal Statement
Read Grand Canyon University’s “GCU Doctrinal Statement” on the GCU website.

https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission
The Nuremberg Code
Refer to “The Nuremberg Code” found on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.

https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf
ANA Code of Ethics
Refer to the ANA (American Nurses’ Association) Code of Ethics on the VCU website (2020).

https://www.vcuhealth.org/explore-vcu-health/for-health-professionals/nursing/about-nursing-at-vcu/ana-code-of-ethics
Ethical Positions Statement
Read Grand Canyon University’s “Ethical Positions Statement” on the GCU website.

https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission
Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
Grand Canyon University (Ed.). (2020). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care.

https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php
A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing
Read “A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing.” These resources will help guide your writing process for philosophical writing.

BriefGuidePhilosophicalWriting.docx
WMA Declaration of Helsinki â€“ Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
Refer to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki for this course.

WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

Topic 1: Foundational Issues in Christian Spirituality and Ethics
May 9-15, 2022
Max Points:
130
Objectives:

Explain the nature of spirituality and ethics according to the Christian worldview.
Explain the limitations of science as it relates to ethics.
Explain the current philosophical challenges to a Christian understanding of ethics in health care.
Assessments
Class Introductions
Start Date

May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 11, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
0
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
Take a moment to explore your new classroom and introduce yourself to your fellow classmates. What are you excited about learning? What do you think will be most challenging?
Topic 1 DQ 1
Start Date

May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 11, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
What would spirituality be according to your own worldview? How do you believe that your conception of spirituality would influence the way in which you care for patients?

Topic 1 DQ 2
Start Date

May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 13, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
What aspects of the topic readings do you find the most interesting? What is your view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings? Explain.

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
Start Date

May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 15, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
100
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Based on the required topic Resources, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
What is ultimate reality?
What is the nature of the universe?
What is a human being?
What is knowledge?
What is your basis of ethics?
What is the purpose of your existence?
Remember to support your reflection with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Week 1 Participation
Start Date

May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 15, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Active
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.

Resources
What Is Scientism?

Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018).

https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism
10 Things You Should Know About Scientism

Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018).

https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/
Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 1 from Practicing Dignity.

For additional information, see the “Topic 1: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T1OptionalResources.docx
Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smi… Read More
https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC
Literary Styles in the Bible

View “Literary Styles in the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/
What Is the Bible?

View “What Is the Bible?” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/
The Story of the Bible

View “The Story of the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/
Topic 2: God, Humanity, and Human Dignity
May 16-22, 2022
Max Points:
230
Objectives:

Explain the Christian view of the nature of human persons.
Compare the Christian view of intrinsic human value and dignity in contrast to secular views of personhood.
Evaluate how the concept of intrinsic human dignity is applied in the process of ethical decision-making.
Assessments
Topic 2 DQ 1
Start Date

May 16, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 18, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
What is the Christian concept of the imago Dei? How might it be important to health care, and why is it relevant?

Topic 2 DQ 2
Start Date

May 16, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 20, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
According to your worldview, what value does a human person have? How does your position affect your stance on controversial bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

Case Study on Moral Status
Start Date

May 16, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 22, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
200
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments
PHI-413V-RS-T2CaseStudyFetalAbnormality.docx
Week 2 Participation
Start Date

May 16, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 22, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.

Resources
Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status

View the video “Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status,” by Jeff Sebo, from Wireless Philosophy.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 from Practicing Dignity.

Read the attached article, “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound Intellectual Disabilities,” by Devan Stahl and… Read More
JCID 6.1-6.2 – Article – D. Stahl_J.Kilner – Image of God Bioethics and PWIDs.pdf
Optional â€“ Topic 2: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 2: Optional Study Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T2OptionalResources.docx
Optional â€“ Joni and Friends

For additional information, the Joni and Friends website is recommended:

Home

Topic 3: Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative
May 23-29, 2022
Max Points:
180
Objectives:

Describe the four principles and four boxes approach to biomedical ethics.
Describe how the four principles and four boxes approach would be applied according to the Christian worldview.
Assessments
Topic 3 DQ 1
Start Date

May 23, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 25, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic Resources in your response.

Topic 3 DQ 2
Start Date

May 23, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 27, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative
Start Date

May 23, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 29, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
150
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic Resources, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments
PHI-413V-RS-T3ApplyingFourPrinciplesCaseStudy.docx
PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx
Week 3 Participation
Start Date

May 23, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

May 29, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.

Resources
Understanding Health and Healing

View the “Understanding Health and Healing” media piece.

https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/
New Testament Overview

View the online video, “New Testament Overview,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018… Read More

Word Study: Shalom/Peace

View the online video, “Word Study: Shalom/Peace,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2017).

Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care

Read “Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care,” by Orr, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (2015)…. Read More
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05
Sacrifice and Atonement

Explore “Sacrifice and Atonement” webpage and watch the video, on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/
Word Study: Khata/Sin

View the online video, “Word Study: Khata/Sin,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018).

Optional â€“ Topic 3: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 3: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T3OptionalResources.docx
Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 3 from Practicing Dignity.

View the online video, “Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2… Read More

The Messiah

Explore “The Messiah” webpage and watch the video on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/
Topic 4: Death, Dying, and Grief
May 30-Jun 5, 2022
Max Points:
230
Objectives:

Explain the meaning and significance of death in light of the Christian narrative and the hope of resurrection.
Analyze end of life issues.
Assessments
Topic 4 DQ 1
Start Date

May 30, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 1, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
How often do you engage with or witness death in your work? How has this experience or the lack of it shaped your view of death? Has it gotten easier or harder for you to accept the fact of death? As you explain, include your clinical specialty.

Topic 4 DQ 2
Start Date

May 30, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 3, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
Reflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response.

Case Study on Death and Dying
Start Date

May 30, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 5, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
200
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic Resources you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?
How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection?
As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?
What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?
Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George’s situation?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments
PHI-413V-RS-T4CaseStudyEndOfLifeDecisions.docx
Week 4 Participation
Start Date

May 30, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 5, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.

Resources
Optional â€“ Topic 4: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 4: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T4OptionalResources.docx
Euthanasia

Read “Euthanasia,” by Wells, Frey, and Cataldo, from Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health (2013).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865
Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 4 from Practicing Dignity.

Analyze a health care situation with an ethical dilemma for an individual patient and his or her caregivers.
Utilize ethical theories, principles, and a decision-making framework to propose a resolution to ethical dilemmas faced by individual clients and their caregivers.
Assessments
Topic 5 DQ 1
Start Date

Jun 6, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 8, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
What is your definition of spiritual care? How does it differ or accord with the description given in the topic readings? Explain.

Topic 5 DQ 2
Start Date

Jun 6, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 10, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation?

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
Start Date

Jun 6, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 12, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
200
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
In addition to the topic Resources, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Attachments
PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx
Field Experience Site Information Form
Start Date

Jun 6, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 12, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
0
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
In preparation for your clinical practice experience, you will need to access the “Field Experience Site Information Form” from your student portal. You will be submitting your chosen mentor, site information, and information regarding your chosen experience through this form in order to start the process of being cleared for your practice experience. You can find information on the mentor and site requirements by viewing the “Guidelines for Undergraduate Field Experiences” located in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions resource page in the Student Success Center.

For this assignment, complete the required “Field Experience Site Information Form” via your student portal. Once you log into your Student Portal, go to My Apps/Edocs/Click here to access all documents pending an e-signature. If you have any questions concerning this form, or if you are unable to view it in your student portal, contact your assigned field experience counselor for assistance.

NOTE: Completion of the form works best on a non-mobile device. Please make sure your pop-up blockers are turned off.

Once you have completed the site information form, a confirmation receipt will be sent to your my.gcu.edu email. Upload and submit your confirmation receipt in this assignment.

For further instructions, refer to “GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form” in your topic Resources.

For students in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care program, which does not require field experience.”

For students enrolled concurrently with their community college, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Concurrent Enrollment Program, which does not require field experience until admitted to the full degree program. Therefore, I am exempt from this requirement at this time.”

Week 5 Participation
Start Date

Jun 6, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Jun 12, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.

Resources
GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form

Refer to the “Field Experience Site Information Form” page in the GCU Technical Support Help Center for further instructions from… Read More
https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360000596207
Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients

Read ” Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients” by Timmins and Caldeira, from Nursing Standard (2017).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374
Optional â€“ Topic 5: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 5: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T5OptionalResources.docx
End of Life and Sanctity of Life, Commentary 1

Read “End of Life and Sanctity of Life,, Commentary 1,” by Reichman, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics… Read More
http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html
Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions

Read “Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions,” by Anan… Read More
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05
Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 5 from Practicing Dignity.

https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php
Participation Requirements
Participating in classroom discussion is paramount to the learning experience. Participating in the weekly discussions allows students and instructors to share experiences, investigate complicated subject matter, share expertise, and examine the content from new perspectives. The qualitative participation requirements are: Follow-up responses to classmatesâ€™ initial answers or responses that integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject, offering a personal observation or experience, or referencing real-world examples, current events, or presenting current research on the topic. Classroom interaction demonstrating deeper or broader thoughts beyond rephrasing what the textbook has presented on the topic. Responses encouraging further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class. Asking additional, relevant questions about the weekâ€™s topic. Communications that are presented in a professional and supportive manner, and with respectful tone. Participation can be earned only by posting substantive, quality messages to fellow classmates and the instructor in the main forum of the classroom. Certain courses may have alternative participation requirements. Students are encouraged to review the course syllabus and consult with the faculty member prior to the course start.
The participation expectations in this class are:

Number of Required Substantive Posts Each Day: 2
Number of Required Days: 3

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

PHI 413 Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Paper

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

PHI 413 Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Paper