PHI 413V Assignment: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

 PHI 413V Assignment: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

 PHI 413V Assignment: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Assessment Description

For this final assignment, you will be tasked to review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care interventions throughout their plan of care. In particular, the focus will be on the Christian application of the four principles, as well as appropriate options in providing a patient with spiritual care.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE  PHI 413V Assignment: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Based on the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and reading the topic Resources, complete the “Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis” document in a maximum of 1,500 words, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:

Patient autonomy

Christian perspective and actions related to sickness and health, principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence

Spiritual needs assessment and appropriate interventions for all involved in providing care

Accountability that would demonstrate an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and person-centered care and participatory approach to care

Note: Participatory approach to care calls for involving stakeholders, particularly the participants in a program or those affected by a given policy, in specific aspects of the evaluation process. The approach covers a wide range of different types of participation, and stakeholders can be involved at any stage of the impact evaluation process, including its design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and managing a study.

Also, person-centered care is “empowering people to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services” (WHO, 2021). This care strategy is based on the belief that patient views, input, and experiences can help improve overall health outcomes.

Support your response using only the following Topic 5 Resources:

Chapter 5 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

“Assessing Spiritual Health Through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care”

“Faith-Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families”

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS Health Sciences

1.2: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

BS Nursing (RN to BSN)

9.1: Demonstrate an ethical comportment in one’s practice reflective of nursing’s mission to society.

9.2: Employ participatory approach to nursing care.

9.3: Demonstrate accountability to the individual, society, and the profession.

9.5: Demonstrate the professional identity of nursing.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns with AACN Core Competencies: 2.8, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total200 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

1. Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy
0 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy, does not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook chapter and topic Resources, or analysis is not provided.
19.5 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy, is a copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that demonstrates a poor understanding of the related concepts.
22.5 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy, demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

25.5 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy, demonstrates a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.
30 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy, demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

2. Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence

0 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, does not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook chapter and topic Resources, or analysis is not provided.
52 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, is a copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that demonstrates a poor understanding of the related concepts.

60 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.
68 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE  PHI 413V Assignment: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
HERE

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, demonstrates a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.
80 points

Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

3. Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (B)

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son (C1.2)
0 points

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son, does not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook chapter and topic Resources, or analysis is not provided.
19.5 points

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son, is a copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that demonstrates a poor understanding of the related concepts.
22.5 points

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son, demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

25.5 points

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son, demonstrates a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.
30 points

Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son, demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

4. Professional Standards of Practice (B)

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care (C9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5)
0 points

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care does not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook chapter and topic Resources, or analysis is not provided.
26 points

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care is a copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that demonstrates a poor understanding of the related concepts.
30 points

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

34 points

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care demonstrates a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.
40 points

Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources and information from Topic 3 assignment responses.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
7.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

9 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
10.2 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
12 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
5.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

6.8 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.