PRAC 6541 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT: JOURNAL ENTRY 

PRAC 6541 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT: JOURNAL ENTRY

PRAC 6541 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT: JOURNAL ENTRY

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

This week, you will write a Journal Entry reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PRAC 6541 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT: JOURNAL ENTRY  HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Journal Entry (2–3 pages):?

Based on your experience,

Describe an interesting case or a case that you have never seen before.

Explain what you found challenging.

Explain what you would do differently from your Preceptor.

Explain the cultural differences you found challenging.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

Mold, J. W., Fox, C., Wisniewski, A., Darby Lipman, P., Krauss, M. R., Harris, D. R., Aspy, C., Cohen, R. A., Elward, K., Frame, P., Yawn, B. P., Solberg, L. I., & Gonin, R. (2014). Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: A randomized controlled trial.Links to an external site. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(3), 233–240. http://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1624Links to an external site.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2012). Expert panel report 3 (EPR3): Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma (EPR-3), 1–12.Links to an external site. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/guidelines-for-diagnosis-management-of-asthmaLinks to an external site.

Ralston, S. L., Lieberthal, A. S., Meissner, H. C., Alverson, B. K., Baley, J. E., Gadomski, A. M., Johnson, D. W., Light, M. J., Maraqa, N. F., Mendonca, E. A., Phelan, K. J., Zorc, J. J., Stanko-Lopp, D., Brown, M. A., Nathanson, I., Rosenblum, E., Sayles, S., III, & Hernandez-Cancio, S. (2014). Clinical practice guideline: The diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis.Links to an external site. Pediatrics, 134(5), E1474–E1502. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2742.

Links to an external site.

Note: This resource is the most current clinical practice guideline.

Practicum Resources

HSoft?Corporation. (2019).?Welcome to MeditrekLinks to an external site.. https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.html

Note: Use this website to log in to?Meditrek?to report your clinical hours and patient?encounters.Links to an external site.

Walden University. (2019). MSN nurse practitioner practicum manualLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/formsanddocumentsLinks to an external site.

Walden University Field Experience. (2019a). Field experience: College of Nursing.Links to an external site.?https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/homeLinks to an external site.

Walden University Field Experience. (2019b). Student practicum resources: NP student orientationLinks to an external site..

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/StudentPracticum/NP_StudentOrientation

BY DAY 7

Complete your Journal Entry #2 Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Journal2+last name+first initial.

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week5_Journal2_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection
50 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

49 to >39.0 pts

Good

Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

39 to >30.0 pts

Fair

Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

30 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments
50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth
30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

29 to >19.0 pts

Good

Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.

19 to >9.0 pts

Fair

Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.

9 to >0 pts

Poor

Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

14 to >10.0 pts

Good

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

5 to >0 pts

Poor

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

No APA errors

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains 1-2 APA errors

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains 3-5 APA errors

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains > 5 APA errors
5 pts

Total Points: 100