PRAC 6565 Week 11 Assignment: Goals Evaluation

PRAC 6565 Week 11 Assignment: Goals Evaluation

PRAC 6565 Week 11 Assignment: Goals Evaluation

To prepare:

Review your completed Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.
Assignment (1 page)
Perform a new self-assessment.
Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum.
Summarize the results.
Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PRAC 6565 Week 11 Assignment: Goals Evaluation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content
Name: PRAC_6565_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Perform a new self-assessment, rating yourself on clinical skills based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.
Points Range:40.5 (40.50%) – 45 (45.00%)
The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary.
Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%)
The response provides an accurate summary.
Points Range:31.5 (31.50%) – 35.5 (35.50%)
The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 31 (31.00%)
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary, or the summary is missing.
Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.
Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%)
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail which goals were accomplished and which were not. Full explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
Points Range:32 (32.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
The response accurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
Points Range:28 (28.00%) – 31 (31.00%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 27 (27.00%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not, or explanation is missing. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals, or explanation is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:

Student uses correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains one or two (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting:
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a one or two (1 or 2) APA format errors.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Name:PRAC_6565_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

NURS 6565: Goals Evaluation

As a nurse practitioner, setting goals is essential since it helps individuals in ensuring that they keep a record of their strengths and opportunities as well as overall weaknesses and threats that may hinder these goals’ achievement (Renzi et al., 2019). Some goals that were important to me included acknowledging the best way to order appropriate diagnostics and laboratory investigations to ensure that I diagnose and treat my cancer patients to achieve positive health outcomes. Some diagnostics areas I am confident in include cerumen removal, clinical breast examination, gait and balance assessment, herpes culture, pap smear, and peak flow meter. For example, nurse practitioners must understand how to properly engage in cerumen removal to prevent the patients from suffering adverse effects like hearing loss. Also, a pap smear is essential in the 21^st century since it helps women realize their cervical cancer statement to prevent its occurrence and advance to adverse stages.  

However, some of the areas I realized I need to work on for better results include Digital Rectal Exam, CXR Interpretation I &D abscess, and KOH skin slide for fungus. According to Christie et al. (2019), a digital rectal examination is essential for patients with stool problems. Therefore, through engaging in research from known nursing scholarly journals, I am sure that I will manage to understand how one carry’s out the examination. Another learning opportunity is engaging in CXR interpretation, KOH skin slide for fungus, and I&D abscess since they are also essential when carrying out successful diagnostics (Fischbach et al., 2021). I see opportunities rather than threats in areas that I would not complete without supervision because I will reevaluate my personal and professional goals, making it easier for me to boost my areas of weakness. Hence, it will be crucial for me to involve my mentor and nursing tutors in enhancing these areas of weakness to improve my productivity in nursing practice.

References

Christie, D. R., Windsor, J., & Sharpley, C. F. (2019). A systematic review of the accuracy of the digital rectal examination as a method of measuring prostate gland volume. Journal of Clinical Urology, 12(5), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415819854852

Fischbach, F., Fischbach, M., & Stout, K. (2021). Fischbach’s A Manual of Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Renzi, C., Kaushal, A., Emery, J., Hamilton, W., Neal, R. D., Rachet, B., … & Lyratzopoulos, G. (2019). Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms. Nature reviews clinical oncology, 16(12), 746-761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6